The role of health services research in the Veterans Administration-and beyond

1981 ◽  
Vol 5 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 147-155
Author(s):  
Cecil G. Sheps
2015 ◽  
Vol 95 (12) ◽  
pp. 1703-1711 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sean D. Rundell ◽  
Adam P. Goode ◽  
Janna L. Friedly ◽  
Jeffrey G. Jarvik ◽  
Sean D. Sullivan ◽  
...  

The concept of value is receiving greater attention in rehabilitation and the broader health care environment. The overall purpose of this article is to present a framework to help clinicians, researchers, educators, and policy makers better understand the role of health services research in developing and evaluating evidence on value in rehabilitation. Value in health care is a multidimensional concept and may be defined differently by various stakeholders, but assessing value typically involves considering a combination of several health and economic outcomes. However, health care stakeholders often lack sufficient information on these outcomes to make well-informed decisions. Health services approaches such as comparative effectiveness research, patient-centered outcomes research, and health economics assessments are some ways to evaluate value. The evidence generated from such studies directly informs decision making and health policy. Rehabilitation professionals have a great opportunity to increase their engagement in describing, evaluating, delivering, and disseminating high-value care, but there are several barriers they need to consider to be most successful. Embracing health services research best practices is essential for advancing appropriate rehabilitation practice, research, and policy and for addressing challenges to implementing high-value care.


2005 ◽  
Vol 18 (4) ◽  
pp. 26-32 ◽  
Author(s):  
Devidas Menon ◽  
Tania Stafinski

“Evidence-informed” priority-setting in healthcare has become increasingly important in most health systems around the world. This paper presents the results of a two-part study of the role of academic health services research in healthcare priority-setting. First, a review of peer-reviewed literature was done to elicit the factors important to priority-setting. Second, a survey of authors of this literature was conducted to determine the value of relevant academic work to decision-making.


2008 ◽  
Vol 43 (12-13) ◽  
pp. 1729-1746 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter J. Delany ◽  
Joseph J. Shields ◽  
Mark L. Willenbring ◽  
Robert B. Huebner

2017 ◽  
Vol 24 (5) ◽  
pp. 519-520
Author(s):  
James V. Rawson ◽  
Paul Cronin

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document