Development of acute tolerance after oral doses of diazepam and flunitrazepam

1994 ◽  
Vol 113 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 304-310 ◽  
Author(s):  
John Ingum ◽  
Roald Bjørklund ◽  
Rolf Volden ◽  
Jørg Mørland
Keyword(s):  



2020 ◽  
Vol 28 (6) ◽  
pp. 659-668
Author(s):  
R. Edward Comley ◽  
Matthew J. Dry


1969 ◽  
Vol 99 (1) ◽  
pp. 86-93 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. H. Roenigk
Keyword(s):  


1984 ◽  
Vol 3 (1_suppl) ◽  
pp. 191s-220S ◽  
Author(s):  
W.T. Beaver

Twenty years ago, as part of a review of the clinical pharmacology of mild analgesics (Beaver, 1965, 1966), I evaluated reports of those analgesic trials of dextropropoxyphene that appeared to satisfy the minimum methodologic requirements for a controlled clinical trial of analgesic efficacy. On reviewing reports of studies that have been published since then, I find little need to modify my evaluation of the efficacy of dextropropoxyphene that appeared in 1966, at least in respect to the effect of single oral doses: In summary, dextropropoxyphene (hydrochloride) is a mild oral analgesic which has proven superior to placebo in doses of 65 mg or more but which is of questionable efficacy in doses lower than 65 mg. The drug is definitely less potent than codeine: the best available estimates of the relative potency of the two drugs indicating that dextropropoxyphene is approximately 1/2-2/3 as potent. Likewise, dextropropoxyphene in 32-65 mg doses is certainly no more, and possibly less, effective than the usually used doses of aspirin or A.P.C. (aspirin/phenacetin/caffeine). In the interim, the efficacy of dextropropoxyphene has been the subject of a number of other critical reviews (Miller et al., 1970; Miller, 1977), commentaries (Kiplinger & Nickander, 1971; Lasagna, 1976), and even congressional hearings (Beaver, 1979; Moertel, 1979). More importantly, new controlled clinical trials involving dextropropoxyphene hydrochloride or napsylate have been reported, and some of these use more sophisticated design and analysis than those available in 1966. I will therefore discuss the results of those newer studies of apparently suitable scientific design that meet at least the minimum criteria for a valid clinical assay of analgesic activity (Beaver, 1965; Houde et al., 1965,1966; Wallenstein & Houde, 1975; Beaver, 1983), and I will comment on only a few of the studies included in my previous review (Beaver, 1966).



2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 1103.2-1103
Author(s):  
C. Edenius ◽  
G. Ekström ◽  
J. Kolmert ◽  
R. Morgenstern ◽  
P. Stenberg ◽  
...  

Background:Microsomal prostaglandin E synthase-1 (mPGES-1) catalyzes the formation prostaglandin (PG) E2from cyclooxygenase derived PGH2(1, 2). Inhibition of mPGES-1 leads to reduction of pro-inflammatory PGE2, while in vessels there is a concomitant increase of vasoprotective prostacyclin (PGI2) via shunting of PGH2(3,4). Apart from relieving symptoms in experimental animal models of inflammation, inhibitors of mPGES-1 cause relaxation of human medium sized arteries(4)and resistance arteries(5). The prostaglandin profile following mPGES-1 inhibition, explains the anti-inflammatory effects and also opens for the possibility of treating inflammatory diseases with concomitant vasculopathies. GS-248 is a potent and selective inhibitor of mPGES-1 exhibiting sub-nanomolar IC50in human whole bloodex vivo.Objectives:To evaluate safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of GS-248.Methods:Healthy males and females (age 18–73 years) were included in the study. Six cohorts were administrated single oral doses of 1-300mg GS-248 (n=36) or placebo (n=12), three cohorts were administered once daily doses of 20-180mg GS-248 (n=18) or placebo (n=12) over ten days. In addition, 8 subjects were treated in a separate cohort with 200mg celecoxib bid for ten days. Blood samples were drawn for measurement of GS-248 exposure and production of PGE2after LPS incubationex vivo. The content of PGE2and PGI2metabolites was measured in urine. All analyses were performed by LC-MS/MS.Results:GS-248 was safe and well tolerated at all tested dose levels. Maximum plasma concentration was achieved 1 - 2.5 hours after dosing, and half-life was about 10 hours. Induced PGE2formationex vivo,catalyzed by mPGES-1, was completely inhibited for 24 hours after a single low dose (40mg) of GS-248. In urine, GS-248 dose-dependently reduced the excretion of PGE2metabolite by more than 50% whereas the excretion of PGI2metabolite increased more than twice the baseline levels. In the celecoxib cohort urinary metabolites of both PGE2and PGI2were reduced with approx 50%.Conclusion:GS-248 at investigated oral doses was safe and well tolerated. There was a sustained inhibition of LPS induced PGE2formation in whole blood. In urine, there was a metabolite shift showing reduced PGE2and increased PGI2, while celecoxib reduced both PGE2and PGI2metabolites. This suggests that selective inhibition of mPGES-1 results in systemic shunting of PGH2to PGI2formation, leading to anti-inflammatory and vasodilatory effects, while preventing platelet activation. The results warrant further evaluation of GS-248 in inflammatory conditions with vasculopathies such as Digital Ulcers and Raynaud’s Phenomenon in Systemic Sclerosis.References:[1]Korotkova M, Jakobsson PJ. Persisting eicosanoid pathways in rheumatic diseases. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2014;10:229-41[2]Bergqvist F, Morgenstern R, Jakobsson PJ. A review on mPGES-1 inhibitors: From preclinical studies to clinical applications. Prostaglandins Other Lipid Mediat. 2019;147:106383[3]Kirkby NS, et al. Mechanistic definition of the cardiovascular mPGES-1/COX-2/ADMA axis. Cardiovasc Res. 2020[4]Ozen G, et al. Inhibition of microsomal PGE synthase-1 reduces human vascular tone by increasing PGI2: a safer alternative to COX-2 inhibition. Br J Pharmacol. 2017;174:4087-98[5]Larsson K, et al. Biological characterization of new inhibitors of microsomal PGE synthase-1 in preclinical models of inflammation and vascular tone. Br J Pharmacol. 2019;176:4625-38Disclosure of Interests:Charlotte Edenius Shareholder of: Gesynta Pharma, Consultant of: Gesynta Pharma,, Gunilla Ekström Shareholder of: Gesynta Pharma, Consultant of: Gesynta Pharma,, Johan Kolmert Consultant of: Gesynta Pharma,, Ralf Morgenstern Shareholder of: Gesynta Pharma, Employee of: Gesynta Pharma, Patric Stenberg Shareholder of: Gesynta Pharma, Employee of: Gesynta Pharma, Per-Johan Jakobsson Shareholder of: Gesynta Pharma, Grant/research support from: Gesynta Pharma, AstraZeneca,, Göran Tornling Shareholder of: Gesynta Pharma, Vicore Pharma,, Consultant of: Gesynta Pharma, Vicore Pharma, AnaMar



Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document