Congratulations from the central committee of the communist party of the Soviet Union and USSR Council of Ministers to builders, assemblers, designers, mechanical engineers, and all participants in the construction of the Zeya hydroelectric station

In the current article the analysis of the mechanisms of the providing of management of the building process of the Southern-Ukrainian and Northern-Crimean channels in the command-administrative system of USSR during the late Stalinist period has been made. The building of Southern-Ukrainian and Northern-Crimea channels had a particular political value for USSR in the beginning of 1950s, while the realization of this project was supposed to create the prerequisites for the economic development of the Southern regions of Ukraine (until 1954) and the Northern regions of the Crimea. The General Directorate 'Ukrvodstroy" of the Ministry of Cotton of USSR was supposed to be responsible for the building of the Southern-Ukrainian and Northern-Crimean channels. However, the Ministry of Cotton as well as other union ministries turned out to be ineffective in the process of administering of "communism construction". On the other hand, the Council of Ministers of Ukrainian SSR and the Communist Party of the Soviet Union were very effective in providing of the building of the Southern-Ukrainian and Northern-Crimean channels. Due to the effective activity of the leadership of Ukrainian SSR related to the providing of the building of Southern-Ukrainian and Northern-Crimean channels, the revival of the social-economic development of the Crimea took place, particularly in the far end regions of the Crimea it happened due to the development of capital investments required for the program of channels building. Thus, the Council of Ministers of Ukrainian Soviet Socialist Republic and the Central Committee of Communist Party (Bolsheviks) of Ukraine was actively expanding its territory competence on the territory of the Crimea.

Download Full-text

REGIONAL LEADERS OF THE COMMUNIST PARTY OF THE SOVIET UNION AND THEIR IDEAS ON ECONOMIC MANAGEMENT IMPROVEMENT IN 1965–1985, SIBERIA*

Bulletin of Kemerovo State University ◽

10.21603/2078-8975-2018-4-47-57 ◽

2018 ◽

pp. 47-57

Author(s):

A. B. Konovalov

Keyword(s):

Soviet Union ◽

Communist Party ◽

Central Committee ◽

Economic Management ◽

State Planning ◽

Ussr Council ◽

The Soviet Union ◽

The One ◽

Management Institutions ◽

Regional Leaders

The study defines the positions of the first secretaries of the Siberian regional committees of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union (CPSU) in the field of economic management in 1965 – 1985. After sector ministries had been restored, regional CPSU leaders declared that management institutions had to be moved to production centers, thus demanding the organization of inter-regional sector bodies on their territories. The paper shows how regional initiatives were supported by the central party-state bodies that introduced public debates and kept sending letters to the CPSU Central Committee, the heads of the USSR Council of Ministers, and the USSR State Planning Committee. The author managed to reveal the conflicts between the first secretaries of the regional committees of the CPSU. The conflicts were caused by the growing need to control the territorial administration bodies of the allied ministries and departments. One may conclude that the regional party bodies intended to strengthen the coordination of the local economic policy. However, the policy was controversial: on the one hand, there was a need to eliminate the redundant management levels of sector ministries and departments; on the other hand, there was a strong motivation to increase the staff of sector departments of regional and regional party committees.

Download Full-text

FINANCIAL SUPPORT FOR CONSTRUCTION OF SOUTH-UKRAINIAN AND NORTH-CRIMEAN CANALS (1950 – 1953)

Bulletin of Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv History ◽

10.17721/1728-2640.2017.132.1.11 ◽

2017 ◽

pp. 50-53

Author(s):

P. Satskyi

Keyword(s):

Soviet Union ◽

Communist Party ◽

Financial Support ◽

Hydroelectric Station ◽

Transport Infrastructure ◽

The Soviet Union ◽

The Status ◽

The Crimea ◽

Economical System ◽

Council Of Ministers

This paper is looking at the financial support for the construction of Southern-Ukrainian and Northern-Crimean Channels. It gained the status of "communism construction" and started in 1951 on the basis of the resolution of the Council of Ministers of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union from the 20th of September in 1950. The research of the financial support for the building of channels was made in the context of the analysis of the command-administrative system of the USSR of the late Stalinist period. In particular, there was also the analysis of the reasons for underfunding of the building and also the role of the Council of Ministers of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union in the supply of the process of building of Southern-Ukrainian and Northern-Crimean Channels considering the difficulties with the financial support. Thus, a particular attention has been paid to the fact that the financing of the building of Southern-Ukrainian and Northern-Crimean Channels was done together with the building of The Kakhovka Hydroelectric Station. However, in the beginning of construction works the financial resources, which were supposed to be spent on the building of channels, in majority were spent on the building of The Kakhovka Hydroelectric Station. In the author's opinion, it was related to the fact that during the initial stage of channel building the first constructions build were the buildings for the employees as well as social and transport infrastructure buildings surrounding the channel constructions. Thus, the exploration of the Southern areas of Ukraine and Northern areas of the Crimea has started the backgrounds for the active inhabitance of these regions has started, which was the main target of the constructions works. The research of the financial support of the building was done on the basis of the backgrounds of the budget system and the budget politics of USSR. We can conclude that the building of the Southern-Ukrainian and the Northern-Crimean Channels attracted the incoming investments for the construction sites built on the territory of the Crimea. This fact had a particular impact for the social-economic development in terms of ineffective economical system of USSR in the late Stalinist period. Moreover, this was a start of the Crimea's integration in the Ukrainian social-economical system.

Download Full-text