The role of chemoendocrine agents in postoperative adjuvant therapy for breast cancer: Meta-analysis of the first collaborative studies of postoperative adjuvant chemoendocrine therapy for breast cancer (ACETBC)

e16083 Background: While neoadjuvant therapy followed by esophagectomy is the standard of care for locally advanced esophageal cancer, the role of adjuvant therapy is uncertain. As such, this review aims to analyze esophageal cancer patients who previously underwent neoadjuvant therapy followed by a curative resection (negative margins) to determine whether additional adjuvant therapy is associated with improved survival outcomes. Methods: MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CENTRAL databases were searched up to August 2020 for studies comparing patients with esophageal cancer who underwent neoadjuvant therapy and curative resection with and without adjuvant therapy. Primary outcome was overall survival (OS), and secondary outcomes were disease-free survival (DFS), locoregional recurrence, and distant recurrence at 1 and 5-years. Random effects meta-analysis was conducted where appropriate. Grading of recommendations, assessment, development, and evaluation (GRADE) was used to assess the certainty of evidence. Results: Ten studies involving 6,462 patients were included. 6,162 (95.36%) patients from 7 studies received adjuvant chemotherapy, whereas 296 (4.58%) patients from 3 studies underwent either adjuvant radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy. When compared to patients who received neoadjuvant therapy and esophagectomy alone, adjuvant therapy groups experienced a significant overall survival benefit by 48% at 1-year (RR 0.52, 95%CI 0.41-0.65, P < 0.001, moderate certainty). This reduction in mortality was consistent at long-term 5-year follow-up (RR 0.91, 95%CI 0.87-0.96, P < 0.001, moderate certainty). Subgroup analysis on pathologic node positive patients demonstrated a consistent survival benefit at 1-year (RR 0.57, 95% CI 0.42-0.77, P < 0.001, moderate certainty) and 5-year (RR 0.89 95%CI 0.84-0.95, P < 0.001, moderate certainty). While adjuvant therapy presented no benefit for the T0-2 stage subgroup, patients with T3-4 disease experienced a significant reduction in mortality with the addition of adjuvant therapy at both 1-year (RR 0.51, 95% CI 0.41-0.63, P < 0.001, moderate certainty), and 5-years (RR 0.91, 95% CI 0.85-0.97, P = 0.005, moderate certainty). Due to incomplete reporting, the added benefit of adjuvant therapy was uncertain regarding DFS, locoregional recurrence, and distant recurrence. Conclusions: Adjuvant therapy after neoadjuvant treatment and curative esophagectomy provides improved OS at 1 and 5 years, but the benefit for DFS and locoregional/distant recurrence was uncertain due to limited reporting of these outcomes.

Download Full-text

Prognostic role of s-phase kinase-associated protein 2 in breast cancer: A meta-analysis

Indian Journal of Cancer ◽

10.4103/0019-509x.186559 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 52 (7) ◽

pp. 153

Author(s):

S Ma ◽

D Wang ◽

Y Shi ◽

N Li ◽

H Ren ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Breast Cancer ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

S Phase ◽

Prognostic Role

Download Full-text

Randomized trial of chemoendocrine therapy started before or after surgery for treatment of primary breast cancer.

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.1995.13.3.547 ◽

1995 ◽

Vol 13 (3) ◽

pp. 547-552 ◽

Cited By ~ 262

Author(s):

T J Powles ◽

T F Hickish ◽

A Makris ◽

S E Ashley ◽

M E O'Brien ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Breast Cancer ◽

Clinical Trial ◽

Adjuvant Therapy ◽

Randomized Trial ◽

Response Rate ◽

Neoadjuvant Treatment ◽

Operable Breast Cancer ◽

Chemoendocrine Therapy ◽

Primary Operable Breast Cancer

PURPOSE To evaluate in a randomized clinical trial systemic chemoendocrine therapy used as primary (neo-adjuvant) treatment before surgery in women with primary operable breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients aged less than 70 years with clinically palpable, primary operable breast cancer diagnostically confirmed by fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) and suitable for treatment with surgery, radiotherapy, cytotoxic chemotherapy, and tamoxifen were considered eligible. Patients randomized to neoadjuvant treatment received four cycles of chemo-therapy for 3 months before surgery followed by another four cycles after surgery, and were compared with patients randomized to adjuvant therapy who received eight cycles of chemotherapy over 6 months after surgery. RESULTS Of 212 patients who were randomized to receive either adjuvant (n = 107) or neoadjuvant (n = 105) chemoendocrine therapy, 200 are now assessable for response. The two groups are comparable for age, menopausal status, disease stage, and surgical requirements. The overall clinical response rate was 85%, with a complete histologic response rate of 10%. There was a significant reduction in the requirement for mastectomy in patients who received neoadjuvant treatment (13%) as compared with those who received adjuvant therapy (28%) (P < .005). Symptomatic and hematologic acute toxicity was low and similar for adjuvant and neoadjuvant therapy. The median follow-up period for patients in this trial is 28 months, during which time four patients have relapsed locally and 20, including one of the local relapses, have developed metastatic disease, 19 of whom have died. The follow-up period is too brief to evaluate relapse rate or survival duration. CONCLUSION This trial confirms previous reports of a high rate of response to neoadjuvant therapy, but is the first to include small primary cancers and to show, in the context of a randomized trial, a reduction in the requirement for mastectomy. Until disease-free and overall survival data are available from the larger National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP)-18 trial, such neoadjuvant treatment cannot be recommended outside of a clinical trial.

Download Full-text

Platinum-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy for triple-negative breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Journal of International Medical Research ◽

10.1177/0300060520964340 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 48 (10) ◽

pp. 030006052096434

Author(s):

Zhen-Yu Li ◽

Zhen Zhang ◽

Xiao-Zhong Cao ◽

Yun Feng ◽

Sha-Sha Ren

Keyword(s):

Breast Cancer ◽

Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy ◽

Triple Negative Breast Cancer ◽

Triple Negative ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Complete Response ◽

Extensive Literature ◽

Extensive Literature Search ◽

Positive Breast Cancer

Background Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is associated with higher aggressiveness and mortality than hormone-positive breast cancer because of the lack of approved therapeutic targets. Patients with TNBC who attain a pathological complete response (pCR) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy have improved survival. Platinum-based agents show promising activity in TNBC; however, their use remains controversial. We conducted a meta-analysis to assess the role of platinum-based agents in neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with TNBC. Methods We performed an extensive literature search of the Pubmed, Embase, and Cochrane databases. We calculated pooled odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the identified studies. Results Eight randomized controlled trials with 1345 patients were included in the analysis. The addition of platinum-based agents improved pCR compared with neoadjuvant therapy based on anthracyclines, cyclophosphamide, taxanes, and fluorouracil (49.1% vs. 35.9%; OR: 1.87, 95% CI: 1.23–2.86). Hematological adverse events were similar in both groups, except for more thrombocytopenia in the platinum-based group (OR: 7.96, 95% CI: 3.18–19.93). Conclusion The addition of platinum-based agents to neoadjuvant chemotherapy improved pCR rates in patients with TNBC, with a slight increase in hematological toxicities. Platinum-based agents might thus be an accessible and economically viable option in patients with TNBC.

Download Full-text