scholarly journals Epidural lidocaine with sufentanil and epinephrine for abdominal hysterectomy under general anaesthesia: respiratory depression and postoperative analgesia

1992 ◽  
Vol 39 (3) ◽  
pp. 220-225 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert A. Dyer ◽  
Kevin Camden-Smith ◽  
Michael F. M. James
2016 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
pp. 3-11
Author(s):  
Bidhan Paul ◽  
Debashis Banik ◽  
AKM Shamsul Alam

Background: In perioperative care, a reliable pain management is a vital appeal. Over recent years, Transversus Abdominis Plane (TAP) block is introduced as an important component of multimodal analgesia.Objective: To evaluate efficacy of TAP block in postoperative analgesia for Total Abdominal Hysterectomy (TAH) with subarachnoid block (SAB) in comparison of morphine consumption and VAS score.Methods: 60 patients were randomly allocated into 2 groups (TAP group-A & control group-B). Standard SAB was applied to all patients for elective TAH. Immediate after operation classical TAP block was performed through both Lumber Triangle Of Petit (LTOP) of group A patients. Both groups were placed in Post Anesthesia Care Unit (PACU), arranged a common standard postoperative analgesic regimen for all, observed periodically and documented it accordingly in pre-designed data sheet.Results: TAP block prolonged the mean time of 1st required I/V morphine (TAP vs control, mean±SD 271.23±40.34 vs 195.33±22.16 min., p=0.001HS). Morphine requirement was also reduced (17.4±5.4 vs 26.2±4.4 mg, p=0.001HS). Pain VAS scores at rest and movement were also reduced at all time period (p? 0.01 to 0.001). There was no complication attributed to the TAP block.Conclusion: TAP block provided considerably effective postoperative analgesia in first 24 hours after major abdominal surgery like TAH.Journal of Bangladesh Society of Anaesthesiologists 2014; 27(1): 3-11


1983 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 27-30 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. A. Pybus ◽  
B. E. D'Bras ◽  
G. Goulding ◽  
H. Liberman ◽  
T. A. Torda

Seventy patients undergoing haemorrhoidectomy under general anaesthesia were randomly allocated to one of five treatment groups in order to compare the effectiveness of various caudal agents in the control of postoperative pain. Four groups were given a caudal injection of either 2% lignocaine, 0.5% bupivacaine, 2% lignocaine + morphine sulphate 4 mg or normal saline + morphine sulphate 4 mg, while the fifth (control) group did not receive an injection. The number of patients requiring postoperative opiates was significantly higher in the lignocaine group than in the morphine (p <0.05) and morphine-lignocaine (p <0.05) groups. No agent significantly reduced the number requiring opiates. In those who received opiates, the mean analgesic period was 228 minutes in the control group, and was significantly longer following bupivacaine (577 min, p <0.01), morphine-lignocaine (637 min, p <0.05) and morphine (665 min, p <0.01). The mean analgesic period following lignocaine (349 min) was not significantly different from control. The incidence of catheterisation was lowest in those patients who did not receive caudal analgesia.


2001 ◽  
Vol 93 (1) ◽  
pp. 192-196 ◽  
Author(s):  
André Gottschalk ◽  
Frank Schroeder ◽  
Mike Ufer ◽  
Ali Oncü ◽  
Hartmut Buerkle ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document