Effects of elevated CO2 on growth and carbon partitioning in rice

1998 ◽  
Vol 43 (23) ◽  
pp. 1982-1986 ◽  
Author(s):  
Weihong Lin ◽  
Dali Wang
1998 ◽  
Vol 25 (7) ◽  
pp. 801 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lewis H. Ziska ◽  
James A. Bunce ◽  
Frances Caulfield

The growth characteristics of six and the reproductive development of five soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] cultivars were examined at 39 Pa (ambient) and 70 Pa (elevated) CO2 partial pressures in temperature-controlled glasshouses. Significant intraspecific variation for both growth and seed yield in response to elevated CO2 was observed among the cultivars. At elevated CO2, total biomass increased an average of 42% at the end of the vegetative stage, while average seed yield increased by only 28%. No changes in % protein or % oil were observed for any cultivar at elevated CO2, relative to ambient CO2. The relative enhancement of either vegetative or reproductive growth at elevated CO2 was not correlated with changes in the absolute or relative increase in single leaf photosynthetic rate among cultivars at elevated CO2. For soybean, the greatest response of seed yield to elevated CO2 was associated with increased production of lateral branches, increased pod production or increased seed weight, suggesting different strategies of carbon partitioning in a high CO2 environment. Data from this experiment indicates that differences in carbon partitioning among soybean cultivars may influence reproductive capacity and fecundity as atmospheric CO2 increases, with subsequent consequences for future agricultural breeding strategies.


Author(s):  
Michael D. Adcock ◽  
Andrew Brooks ◽  
Richard C. Leegood ◽  
W. Paul

2007 ◽  
Vol 291 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 323-333 ◽  
Author(s):  
Petra M. A. Fransson ◽  
Ian C. Anderson ◽  
Ian J. Alexander

2011 ◽  
Vol 25 (11) ◽  
pp. 1527-1535 ◽  
Author(s):  
Iker Aranjuelo ◽  
Marta Pintó-Marijuan ◽  
Jean Christophe Avice ◽  
Isabel Fleck

1992 ◽  
Vol 40 (5) ◽  
pp. 491 ◽  
Author(s):  
J Masle

Plants growing on dry soils or on soils with high mechanical resistance to root penetration grow more slowly and exhibit lower stomatal conductance than those growing on moist and loose soils. In most situations in nature where edaphic stresses develop rather slowly (compared to stresses imposed in most pot experiments conducted under controlled conditions), photosynthesis is mainly reduced via stomatal effects rather than via changes in mesophyll capacity for photosynthesis. Elevated CO2 will induce an increase in the internal partial pressure of CO2, despite stomatal conductance being lowered even further. Photosynthesis will therefore be improved, and leaf turgor will be increased. It is widely thought that growth on dry or hard soils is not carbon limited because levels of soluble carbohydrates in the leaves and root cells are increased. It is shown in this paper that growth on soil with high mechanical resistance does respond to elevated CO2. However, this response is smaller than expected from the increase of carbon assimilation rate because: (a) carbon partitioning is altered so that supplementary carbohydrates are preferentially allocated to the roots; (b) leaf growth sensitivity to internal availability of sugars is lower than in plants growing on loose soils. These alterations of 'sink activity' and carbon partitioning are mediated by unknown signalling factor(s) induced in the roots. It is not known whether the root factors acting in droughted plants are of the same nature. In both droughted and impeded plants the interacting effects of these factors and of ambient CO2 levels are likely to result in improved transpiration efficiency. More experiments are needed in this area, however, especially to ascertain the relative contribution of changes in growth patterns versus changes in the patterns of water use. In conclusion, the importance of identifying the nature of the sink limitations induced by root signals is emphasised. It is a fundamental area of research to be developed not only for assessing growth responses to rising CO2 under edaphic stress, but likely also for reconciling conflicting responses of field-grown and pot-grown plants.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document