Boundary Interpolation with Blaschke Products of Minimal Degree

2006 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 493-511 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gunter Semmler ◽  
Elias Wegert
2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 176-186
Author(s):  
Elias Wegert ◽  
Ilya Spitkovsky

Abstract In their LAMA 2016 paper Gau, Wang and Wu conjectured that a partial isometry A acting on ℂ n cannot have a circular numerical range with a non-zero center, and proved this conjecture for n ≤ 4. We prove it for operators with rank A = n − 1 and any n. The proof is based on the unitary similarity of A to a compressed shift operator SB generated by a finite Blaschke product B. We then use the description of the numerical range of SB as intersection of Poncelet polygons, a special representation of Blaschke products related to boundary interpolation, and an explicit formula for the barycenter of the vertices of Poncelet polygons involving elliptic functions.


Author(s):  
Sergei Kalmykov ◽  
Béla Nagy

AbstractThe famous Jones–Ruscheweyh theorem states that n distinct points on the unit circle can be mapped to n arbitrary points on the unit circle by a Blaschke product of degree at most $$n-1$$ n - 1 . In this paper, we provide a new proof using real algebraic techniques. First, the interpolation conditions are rewritten into complex equations. These complex equations are transformed into a system of polynomial equations with real coefficients. This step leads to a “geometric representation” of Blaschke products. Then another set of transformations is applied to reveal some structure of the equations. Finally, the following two fundamental tools are used: a Positivstellensatz by Prestel and Delzell describing positive polynomials on compact semialgebraic sets using Archimedean module of length N. The other tool is a representation of positive polynomials in a specific form due to Berr and Wörmann. This, combined with a careful calculation of leading terms of occurring polynomials finishes the proof.


2006 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
pp. 75-98 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pamela Gorkin ◽  
Robert C. Rhoades

2010 ◽  
Vol 107 (2) ◽  
pp. 305
Author(s):  
Isabelle Chalendar ◽  
Pamela Gorkin ◽  
Jonathan R. Partington

This paper considers the problem of boundary interpolation (in the sense of non-tangential limits) by Blaschke products and interpolating Blaschke products. Simple and constructive proofs, which also work in the more general situation of $H^\infty(\Omega)$ where $\Omega$ is a more general domain, are given of a number of results showing the existence of Blaschke products solving certain interpolation problems at a countable set of points on the circle. A variant of Frostman's theorem is also presented.


2002 ◽  
Vol 25 (3) ◽  
pp. 336-337 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zoltan Dienes ◽  
Josef Perner

We consider Perruchet & Vinter's (P&V's) central claim that all mental representations are conscious. P&V require some way of fixing their meaning of representation to avoid the claim becoming either obviously false or unfalsifiable. We use the framework of Dienes and Perner (1999) to provide a well-specified possible version of the claim, in which all representations of a minimal degree of explicitness are postulated to be conscious.


2020 ◽  
Vol 26 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 268-286
Author(s):  
YONG CHENG

AbstractIn this paper, we examine the limit of applicability of Gödel’s first incompleteness theorem ($\textsf {G1}$ for short). We first define the notion “$\textsf {G1}$ holds for the theory $T$”. This paper is motivated by the following question: can we find a theory with a minimal degree of interpretation for which $\textsf {G1}$ holds. To approach this question, we first examine the following question: is there a theory T such that Robinson’s $\mathbf {R}$ interprets T but T does not interpret $\mathbf {R}$ (i.e., T is weaker than $\mathbf {R}$ w.r.t. interpretation) and $\textsf {G1}$ holds for T? In this paper, we show that there are many such theories based on Jeřábek’s work using some model theory. We prove that for each recursively inseparable pair $\langle A,B\rangle $, we can construct a r.e. theory $U_{\langle A,B\rangle }$ such that $U_{\langle A,B\rangle }$ is weaker than $\mathbf {R}$ w.r.t. interpretation and $\textsf {G1}$ holds for $U_{\langle A,B\rangle }$. As a corollary, we answer a question from Albert Visser. Moreover, we prove that for any Turing degree $\mathbf {0}< \mathbf {d}<\mathbf {0}^{\prime }$, there is a theory T with Turing degree $\mathbf {d}$ such that $\textsf {G1}$ holds for T and T is weaker than $\mathbf {R}$ w.r.t. Turing reducibility. As a corollary, based on Shoenfield’s work using some recursion theory, we show that there is no theory with a minimal degree of Turing reducibility for which $\textsf {G1}$ holds.


2021 ◽  
Vol 562 ◽  
pp. 120782
Author(s):  
Xiaomin Zha ◽  
Dexiang Hou ◽  
Zhigang Yu ◽  
Jieyu Zhang ◽  
Kuochih Chou

2010 ◽  
Vol 214 (11) ◽  
pp. 2033-2043 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Brodmann ◽  
E. Park
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document