Prevalence of double pituitary adenomas in a surgical series: Clinical, histological and genetic features

2010 ◽  
Vol 33 (5) ◽  
pp. 325-331 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. Magri ◽  
C. Villa ◽  
D. Locatelli ◽  
P. Scagnelli ◽  
M. S. Lagonigro ◽  
...  
2007 ◽  
Vol 157 (4) ◽  
pp. 371-382 ◽  
Author(s):  
Albert Beckers ◽  
Adrian F Daly

Pituitary adenomas occur in a familial setting in multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1) and Carney’s complex (CNC), which occur due to mutations in the genes MEN1 and PRKAR1A respectively. Isolated familial somatotropinoma (IFS) is also a well-described clinical syndrome related only to patients with acrogigantism. Pituitary adenomas of all types – not limited to IFS – can occur in a familial setting in the absence of MEN1 and CNC; this phenotype is termed familial isolated pituitary adenomas (FIPA). Over the past 7 years, we have described over 90 FIPA kindreds. In FIPA, both homogeneous and heterogeneous pituitary adenoma phenotypes can occur within families; virtually all FIPA kindreds contain at least one prolactinoma or somatotropinoma. FIPA differs from MEN1 in terms of a lower proportion of prolactinomas and more frequent somatotropinomas in the FIPA cohort. Patients with FIPA are significantly younger at diagnosis and have significantly larger pituitary adenomas than matched sporadic pituitary adenoma counterparts. A minority of FIPA families overall (15%) exhibit mutations in the aryl hydrocarbon receptor-interacting protein (AIP) gene; AIP mutations are present in only half of IFS kindreds occurring as part of the FIPA cohort. In families with AIP mutations, pituitary adenomas have a penetrance of over 50%. AIP mutations are extremely rare in patients with sporadic pituitary adenomas. This review deals with pituitary adenomas that occur in a familial setting, describes in detail the clinical, pathological, and genetic features of FIPA, and addresses aspects of the clinical approach to FIPA families with and without AIP mutations.


2017 ◽  
Vol 41 (1) ◽  
pp. 341-345 ◽  
Author(s):  
Naohisa Miyagi ◽  
Ryou Doi ◽  
Terukazu Kuramoto ◽  
Kiyohiko Sakata ◽  
Shigeyuki Tahara ◽  
...  

2006 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 53
Author(s):  
Hai Jin Kim ◽  
Chul Sik Kim ◽  
Jong Suk Park ◽  
Jina Park ◽  
Jee Hyun Kong ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 30 (9) ◽  
pp. 787-790 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Raverot ◽  
W. Arnous ◽  
A. Calender ◽  
J. Trouillas ◽  
G. Sassolas ◽  
...  

Pathology ◽  
2002 ◽  
Vol 34 (1) ◽  
pp. 57-60 ◽  
Author(s):  
Penelope A. Mckelvie ◽  
Peter Mcneill

Pituitary ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 20 (6) ◽  
pp. 702-708 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth Ogando-Rivas ◽  
Andrew F. Alalade ◽  
Jerome Boatey ◽  
Theodore H. Schwartz

2005 ◽  
Vol 37 (6) ◽  
pp. 347-354 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. F. Daly ◽  
M.-L. Jaffrain-Rea ◽  
A. Beckers

Pituitary ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 22 (6) ◽  
pp. 620-632
Author(s):  
Grzegorz Zieliński ◽  
Emir Ahmed Sajjad ◽  
Maria Maksymowicz ◽  
Monika Pękul ◽  
Andrzej Koziarski

Abstract Purpose To explore the incidence of double pituitary adenomas in a tertiary center for pituitary surgery and asses their clinical, imaging and histopathological features. Methods The medical records of the patients operated on for pituitary tumors at the Department of Neurosurgery of Military Institute of Medicine in Warsaw, Poland between the years 2003 and 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. Among the 3270 treated patients, the diagnosis of double pituitary adenoma was established in 22 patients. Clinical, laboratory, detailed histopathological and diagnostics imaging data were collected and analyzed. Results There were 21 cases of synchronous and one case of asynchronous double pituitary adenoma. The main clinical finding was acromegaly (12/22) followed by Cushing’s disease (3/22). The diagnosis of synchronous double pituitary adenoma was suspected in the preoperative MRI in 11 patients. In the remaining patients the diagnosis of contiguous double pituitary adenoma was confirmed in the histopathological examination. There was no predilection for gender and the mean observation time was 74.2 months. In one case of Cushing’s disease the occurrence of double pituitary adenoma led to the initial failure of achieving hormonal remission. One patient presented with double pituitary adenomas as a manifestation of Carney complex. Conclusions Double pituitary adenoma is a rare entity that can pose a significant challenge especially in the setting of Cushing’s disease. Careful inspection of preoperative MRI and diagnostic work-up before transsphenoidal surgery and thorough histopathological microscopic examinations with immunohistochemical staining for all pituitary hormones is essential for establishing the diagnosis of double pituitary adenoma.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document