Male scent-marking pheromone of Bombus ardens ardens (Hymenoptera; Apidae) attracts both conspecific queens and males

2017 ◽  
Vol 104 (9-10) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ryohei Kubo ◽  
Ken-ichi Harano ◽  
Masato Ono
2005 ◽  
Vol 65 (2) ◽  
pp. 103-115 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sharon T. Pochron ◽  
Toni Lyn Morelli ◽  
Pia Terranova ◽  
Jessica Scirbona ◽  
Justin Cohen ◽  
...  

Science ◽  
1974 ◽  
Vol 184 (4132) ◽  
pp. 83-85 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. D. Thiessn ◽  
F. E. Regnier ◽  
M. Rice ◽  
M. Goodwn ◽  
N. Isaacks ◽  
...  

ChemPlusChem ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 80 (5) ◽  
pp. 839-850 ◽  
Author(s):  
Petr Žáček ◽  
Jiří Kindl ◽  
Kateřina Frišonsová ◽  
Markéta Průchová ◽  
Alena Votavová ◽  
...  

1994 ◽  
Vol 72 (6) ◽  
pp. 1093-1099 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hilary N. Feldman

Carnivores use various scent-marking methods. Semi-feral domestic cats (Felis silvestris catus) were observed to use the same means as their wild counterparts. Adult males performed most urine spray marking. Cats scratched tree bark, producing a visual mark, and probably used trees both as markers and for claw sharpening. Most scratching trees were located along frequently used paths rather than along territorial boundaries or scattered randomly throughout a home range. Bark consistency affected the tree species that were scratched, with soft bark preferred. Although deposition of faeces and urine was recorded, there was no clear evidence for their use as territorial markers; cats primarily eliminated away from the core area of the home range. Most faeces were buried, although exposed deposits were also observed. Cats also rubbed against objects, probably using glandular secretions from the face and tail areas to scent mark. Males rubbed objects more than females, and males scent marked more. Individual males may use different means of scent marking. Scent marking in this study supports the idea that cats do not defend territories, instead patrolling and reinforcing marks throughout a looser home range. The suggestion has been made that different forms of marking may serve separate signalling functions.


Behaviour ◽  
1976 ◽  
Vol 56 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 286-297 ◽  
Author(s):  
David B. Adams

AbstractThe temporal sequences of acts and postures of rats during tests for isolation-induced fighting were recorded and analyzed. Scent-marking and olfactory investigation, which have been related to fighting by previous studies, were particularly emphasized. From the data a model was constructed for the sequence of behaviors which lead to and maintain isolation-induced fighting. The typical sequence begins with olfactory investigation and scent-marking; the home rat initially investigates the intruder, and the intruder initially investigates the cage. The combination of olfactory perception of a strange male and a familiar environment, it was suggested, serves to trigger an offensive mechanism in the home rat which leads to bite-and-kick attack and offensive sideways posture. The pain of the attack then triggers defensive mechanism in the intruder rat which leads to defensive upright posture and submissive posture. Whereas the functional role of the bite-and-kick attack appears to be simply the infliction of pain and elicitation of defense in the intruder, the function of offensive sideways posture as a threat behavior may be more complex. It is possible that it becomes a conditioned pain stimulus due to its close temporal pairing with bite-and-kick attack, but it is more likely that it produces defense by a process of sensitization. In any case, following the initial attack, the offensive sideways posture continues to elicit defensive behavior by the intruder even when there are no further attacks. The functional roles of the defensive postures were interpreted as positioning the intruder in such a way that the home rat cannot assume the aggressive posture from which attack is launched. Scent-marking behavior was consistent within strains, within individuals, and across different types of measures (accumulation of scent-marking marking material and performance of the stereotyped scent-marking act, crawl-over-dish). Amount of scent-marking was not correlated with attack, however, and its role in isolation-induced fighting remains unclear. In parallel to findings in other rodents, it was observed that scent-marking was diminished in animals after they had been subjected to attack.


1987 ◽  
Vol 39 (6) ◽  
pp. 677-680 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leeanne E. Tennant ◽  
Emilie F. Rissman ◽  
F.H. Bronson

1989 ◽  
Vol 18 (3) ◽  
pp. 177-189 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Heistermann ◽  
Eckhard Kleis ◽  
Ekkehard Pröve ◽  
Hans-Jürgen Wolters

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document