scholarly journals Gaussian process as complement to test functions for surrogate modeling

2020 ◽  
Vol 61 (3) ◽  
pp. 855-861
Author(s):  
Raphael T. Haftka ◽  
Chanyoung Park
2012 ◽  
Vol 01 (04) ◽  
pp. 1250013 ◽  
Author(s):  
IOANA DUMITRIU ◽  
ELLIOT PAQUETTE

We study the global fluctuations for linear statistics of the form [Formula: see text] as n → ∞, for C1 functions f, and λ1, …, λn being the eigenvalues of a (general) β-Jacobi ensemble. The fluctuation from the mean [Formula: see text] turns out to be given asymptotically by a Gaussian process. We compute the covariance matrix for the process and show that it is diagonalized by a shifted Chebyshev polynomial basis; in addition, we analyze the deviation from the predicted mean for polynomial test functions, and we obtain a law of large numbers.


Entropy ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (9) ◽  
pp. 985
Author(s):  
Youngsaeng Lee ◽  
Jeong-Soo Park

The approximated nonlinear least squares (ALS) method has been used for the estimation of unknown parameters in the complex computer code which is very time-consuming to execute. The ALS calibrates or tunes the computer code by minimizing the squared difference between real observations and computer output using a surrogate such as a Gaussian process model. When the differences (residuals) are correlated or heteroscedastic, the ALS may result in a distorted code tuning with a large variance of estimation. Another potential drawback of the ALS is that it does not take into account the uncertainty in the approximation of the computer model by a surrogate. To address these problems, we propose a generalized ALS (GALS) by constructing the covariance matrix of residuals. The inverse of the covariance matrix is multiplied to the residuals, and it is minimized with respect to the tuning parameters. In addition, we consider an iterative version for the GALS, which is called as the max-minG algorithm. In this algorithm, the parameters are re-estimated and updated by the maximum likelihood estimation and the GALS, by using both computer and experimental data repeatedly until convergence. Moreover, the iteratively re-weighted ALS method (IRWALS) was considered for a comparison purpose. Five test functions in different conditions are examined for a comparative analysis of the four methods. Based on the test function study, we find that both the bias and variance of estimates obtained from the proposed methods (the GALS and the max-minG) are smaller than those from the ALS and the IRWALS methods. Especially, the max-minG works better than others including the GALS for the relatively complex test functions. Lastly, an application to a nuclear fusion simulator is illustrated and it is shown that the abnormal pattern of residuals in the ALS can be resolved by the proposed methods.


Author(s):  
Roxanne A. Moore ◽  
David A. Romero ◽  
Christiaan J. J. Paredis

Computer models and simulations are essential system design tools that allow for improved decision making and cost reductions during all phases of the design process. However, the most accurate models tend to be computationally expensive and can therefore only be used sporadically. Consequently, designers are often forced to choose between exploring many design alternatives with less accurate, inexpensive models and evaluating fewer alternatives with the most accurate models. To achieve both broad exploration of the design space and accurate determination of the best alternatives, surrogate modeling and variable accuracy modeling are gaining in popularity. A surrogate model is a mathematically tractable approximation of a more expensive model based on a limited sampling of that model. Variable accuracy modeling involves a collection of different models of the same system with different accuracies and computational costs. We hypothesize that designers can determine the best solutions more efficiently using surrogate and variable accuracy models. This hypothesis is based on the observation that very poor solutions can be eliminated inexpensively by using only less accurate models. The most accurate models are then reserved for discerning the best solution from the set of good solutions. In this paper, a new approach for global optimization is introduced, which uses variable accuracy models in conjuction with a kriging surrogate model and a sequential sampling strategy based on a Value of Information (VOI) metric. There are two main contributions. The first is a novel surrogate modeling method that accommodates data from any number of different models of varying accuracy and cost. The proposed surrogate model is Gaussian process-based, much like classic kriging modeling approaches. However, in this new approach, the error between the model output and the unknown truth (the real world process) is explicitly accounted for. When variable accuracy data is used, the resulting response surface does not interpolate the data points but provides an approximate fit giving the most weight to the most accurate data. The second contribution is a new method for sequential sampling. Information from the current surrogate model is combined with the underlying variable accuracy models’ cost and accuracy to determine where best to sample next using the VOI metric. This metric is used to mathematically determine where next to sample and with which model. In this manner, the cost of further analysis is explicitly taken into account during the optimization process.


2021 ◽  
pp. 1-25
Author(s):  
Julien Pelamatti ◽  
Loïc Brevault ◽  
Mathieu Balesdent ◽  
El-Ghazali Talbi ◽  
Yannick Guerin

2014 ◽  
Vol 670-671 ◽  
pp. 881-885
Author(s):  
Wen Rui Duan ◽  
Ling Tian

In this paper, a research is performed on the tuning strategy for the shape parameter of the RBF to improve accuracy. The shape parameter is an influential factor for the accuracy but the configuration is commonly based on experience. An algorithm is designed to optimize the shape parameter. Three high-order mathematical benchmarks are used to compare the common RBF and the optimized RBF. This paper shows that the optimized RBF is more accurate for various test functions.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document