Gait analysis following TKA: comparison of conventional technique, computer-assisted navigation and minimally invasive technique combined with computer-assisted navigation

2010 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 285-291 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zoltán Bejek ◽  
Róbert Paróczai ◽  
Miklós Szendrői ◽  
Rita M. Kiss
2009 ◽  
Vol 130 (5) ◽  
pp. 613-620 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jin-Ping Wang ◽  
Tian-Fu Yang ◽  
Qing-Quan Kong ◽  
Shao-Jiang Liu ◽  
Heng Xiao ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 430 ◽  
pp. 213-216
Author(s):  
Dan Crisan ◽  
Dan Ioan Stoia ◽  
Radu Prejbeanu ◽  
Dinu Vermeşan ◽  
Horia Hărăgus

The internal fixator principle is a novel, minimally invasive approach to epiphyseal fractures of the long bones. It has been advocated to provide a stable fixation of fracture fragments with the preservation of the osseous blood supply due to the lack of periosteal decortication. The aim of this minimally invasive technique is to allow for early rehabilitation, so in theory patients that went trough minimally invasive internal fixation osteosynthesis should have better clinical results with higher scores than patients that had classic ORIF technique. We investigated a number of 18 tibial plateau fractures in 18 patients that were matched by fracture classification and patient sex and age, 9 were treated by conventional plating techniques and the other 9 were treated by using an internal fixator. The patients were evaluated pre and postoperatively by conventional radiographic means and by CT scanning with 3D reconstruction, they were evaluated with the KOOS score at 3 and 6 months postoperative. Gait analysis was performed in the lab using a Zebris FDM System and a Zebris CMS 10 3D Movement Analysis System. Gait analysis was performed based on patient availability as soon as ambulation was possible and permitted without auxiliary support (crutches). KOOS scores increased from 3 to 6 months, the initial evaluation showed a mean value of 27,5 (19,7 to 39,4) for the ORIF group and a value of 33,9 (24,1 to 42,4) for the internal fixator group at 3 months, and increased to 64,8 (55,3 to 73,1) for the ORIF group and 69,8 (59,7 to 82,7) for the internal fixator group. The difference between stance and swing times, knee flexion angles and was found not to be statistically significant (p<0.05) at either 3 or 6 months postoperatively. The data shows no clear advantage in using an internal fixator over the classic plating methods at 6 months postoperatively. The minimally invasive technique provided for faster wound healing with better KOOS scores at 3 months but there was no statistically significant difference at 6 months postoperative. Limitations of the current study are the relatively small number of matched patients and the heterogeneity in patient physical characteristics such as patient weight and height and the level of preoperative fitness.


2021 ◽  
pp. 155335062098822
Author(s):  
Eirini Giovannopoulou ◽  
Anastasia Prodromidou ◽  
Nikolaos Blontzos ◽  
Christos Iavazzo

Objective. To review the existing studies on single-site robotic myomectomy and test the safety and feasibility of this innovative minimally invasive technique. Data Sources. PubMed, Scopus, Google Scholar (from their inception to October 2019), as well as Clinicaltrials.gov databases up to April 2020. Methods of Study Selection. Clinical trials (prospective or retrospective) that reported the outcomes of single-site robotic myomectomy, with a sample of at least 20 patients were considered eligible for the review. Results. The present review was performed in accordance with the guidelines for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). Four (4) studies met the inclusion criteria, and a total of 267 patients were included with a mean age from 37.1 to 39.1 years and BMI from 21.6 to 29.4 kg/m2. The mean operative time ranged from 131.4 to 154.2 min, the mean docking time from 5.1 to 5.45 min, and the mean blood loss from 57.9 to 182.62 ml. No intraoperative complications were observed, and a conversion rate of 3.8% was reported by a sole study. The overall postoperative complication rate was estimated at 2.2%, and the mean hospital stay ranged from 0.57 to 4.7 days. No significant differences were detected when single-site robotic myomectomy was compared to the multiport technique concerning operative time, blood loss, and total complication rate. Conclusion. Our findings support the safety of single-site robotic myomectomy and its equivalency with the multiport technique on the most studied outcomes. Further studies are needed to conclude on the optimal minimally invasive technique for myomectomy.


1991 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 117-122 ◽  
Author(s):  
STEPHENIE R. LONG ◽  
RALPH V. CLAYMAN ◽  
STEPHEN M. DIERKS ◽  
SHIMON MERETYK ◽  
TERRY BUELNA

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document