Comparative, prospective, randomized study of the modified minimally invasive technique versus the conventional technique of dynamic hip screw (DHS), fixation for intertrochanteric fractures in the elderly

2014 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 27-33
Author(s):  
Ahmed Shams ◽  
Mohamed El-Sayed ◽  
Mohamed Elsawy ◽  
Kamal Hafez ◽  
Hosam Gad
2013 ◽  
Vol 2013 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Mahmood ◽  
M. Kalra ◽  
M. K. Patralekh

Background. Intertrochanteric fractures of the proximal femur are one of the most common fractures encountered, and dynamic hip screw with a side plate is the standard treatment. We compared a minimally invasive surgical technique with the conventional surgical technique used in the fixation of intertrochanteric fractures with the dynamic hip screw (DHS) device. Methods. Thirty patients with such fractures were treated with the conventional open technique and 30 with a new minimally invasive technique. Patients in both groups were followed up for 1 year. Results. There was less blood loss, minimal soft tissue destruction, shorter hospital stay, and early mobilization with the minimally invasive technique. Conclusion. The present study finds minimally invasive technique superior to conventional (open) DHS.


2014 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. 68-72
Author(s):  
Dayanand M ◽  
◽  
Deepak S ◽  
Manoj Kumar ◽  
Vijay Kumar ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 11
Author(s):  
Rong Ren ◽  
Ying Ren ◽  
Junhua Ji

<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To analyze the effects of dynamic hip screw (DHS) and anatomical locking plate in the treatment of intertrochanteric fractures in elderly patients. <strong>Method: </strong>56 cases of intertrochanteric femur fracture from March 2009 to October 2011 were treated by surgical treatment. The cases were divided into A and B groups with A group treated with DHS and B group with anatomical locking plates. <strong>Results</strong><strong>: </strong>Treatments of the two groups were successful. Operation time, bleeding volume, postoperative drainage, hospitalization time and fracture healing time of B group were significantly less than that of A group (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.05). The incidence of postoperative complications in B group was significantly less than that in the A group (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.05). The excellent and good ratings of B group was 93.1% and 66.7% for the A group. The fine rating of B group was higher than that of A group (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.05). <strong>Conclusion: </strong>Anatomical locking plate internal fixation for the treatment of intertrochanteric fractures in the elderly has certain advantages.</p>


2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
V Dubey ◽  
B Spiegelberg ◽  
S Shahane ◽  
A Samant

Abstract Introduction The goal of treatment of an intertrochanteric femoral fracture is restoration of patient's mobility as early as possible. The dynamic hip screw (DHS) has been used for several decades to treat these fractures. Proximal femoral nails (PFN) are reported to have an advantage in such fractures. This study aims at comparing the results of unstable intertrochanteric fractures femur treated with PFN and DHS. Method This was a prospective, randomized study which includes sixty patients. All patients were available for follow up with 30 patients in each group. The data about intraoperative blood loss, time to union, leg length shortening was collected. The functional outcome at the end of one year was evaluated using Harris Hip Score. Results Blood loss, duration of surgery, time to union and leg length shortening was significantly less in the patients treated with PFN (p &lt; 0.05). The mean harris hip score for patients managed with PFN was significantly more than in DHS group, 12 months after surgery (p = 0.05). Conclusions PFN requires a smaller incision, lesser operative time, less blood loss and has improved functional results. In our opinion PFN may be a better fixation device for most of the unstable intertrochanteric femur fractures.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document