The fixation strength of a novel ACL soft-tissue graft fixation device compared with conventional interference screws: a biomechanical study in vitro

Background Achieving effective soft tissue graft-tibial tunnel fixation remains problematic. Hypothesis No differences would exist for tibialis anterior graft-tibial tunnel fixation when comparing the RetroScrew System (20-mm retrograde screw, 17-mm antegrade screw), the 35-mm tapered Delta Screw (manual tensioning), and the 35-mm BioScrew XtraLok (applied using an instrumented tensioner). Study Design Controlled laboratory study. Methods Porcine tibiae (apparent bone mineral density, 1.3 g/cm2) and human tendon allografts were divided into 3 matched groups of 6 specimens each before cyclic (500 cycles, 50-250 N, 1 Hz) and load-to-failure (20 mm/min) tests. Results The BioScrew XtraLok (210.9 ± 54.9 N/mm) and the 35-mm Delta Screw (224.3 ± 43.7 N/mm) displayed superior stiffness to the RetroScrew System (114.1 ± 23.3 N/mm) (P =. 0004) during cyclic testing. The BioScrew XtraLok (1.0 ± 0.2 mm) and the Delta Screw (0.9 ± 0.2 mm) also displayed less displacement during cyclic testing than the RetroScrew System (1.8 ± 0.5 mm) (P =. 001). During load-to-failure testing, the BioScrew XtraLok withstood greater loads (1436.3 ± 331.3 N) (P =. 001) and displayed greater stiffness (323.6 ± 56.8 N/mm) (P =. 002) than the 35-mm Delta Screw (load, 1042.2 ± 214.4 N; stiffness, 257.2 ± 22.2 N/mm) and the RetroScrew System (load, 778.7 ± 177.5 N; stiffness, 204.4 ± 52.9 N/mm). Conclusion The BioScrew XtraLok with instrumented tensioning displayed superior fixation to the RetroScrew System and the 35-mm Delta Screw applied with manual tensioning. Clinical Relevance The BioScrew XtraLok may provide superior soft tissue graft-tibial tunnel fixation. Further in vitro studies using human tissue and in vivo clinical studies are needed.

Download Full-text

Quantification of assembly forces during creation of head-neck taper junction considering soft tissue bearing: a biomechanical study

Arthroplasty ◽

10.1186/s42836-021-00075-7 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 3 (1) ◽

Author(s):

Toni Wendler ◽

Torsten Prietzel ◽

Robert Möbius ◽

Jean-Pierre Fischer ◽

Andreas Roth ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Soft Tissue ◽

Work Experience ◽

Soft Tissues ◽

Force Sensor ◽

Biomechanical Study ◽

Measuring System ◽

Wide Range ◽

Head Neck

Abstract Background All current total hip arthroplasty (THA) systems are modular in design. Only during the operation femoral head and stem get connected by a Morse taper junction. The junction is realized by hammer blows from the surgeon. Decisive for the junction strength is the maximum force acting once in the direction of the neck axis, which is mainly influenced by the applied impulse and surrounding soft tissues. This leads to large differences in assembly forces between the surgeries. This study aimed to quantify the assembly forces of different surgeons under influence of surrounding soft tissue. Methods First, a measuring system, consisting of a prosthesis and a hammer, was developed. Both components are equipped with a piezoelectric force sensor. Initially, in situ experiments on human cadavers were carried out using this system in order to determine the actual assembly forces and to characterize the influence of human soft tissues. Afterwards, an in vitro model in the form of an artificial femur (Sawbones Europe AB, Malmo, Sweden) with implanted measuring stem embedded in gelatine was developed. The gelatine mixture was chosen in such a way that assembly forces applied to the model corresponded to those in situ. A study involving 31 surgeons was carried out on the aforementioned in vitro model, in which the assembly forces were determined. Results A model was developed, with the influence of human soft tissues being taken into account. The assembly forces measured on the in vitro model were, on average, 2037.2 N ± 724.9 N, ranging from 822.5 N to 3835.2 N. The comparison among the surgeons showed no significant differences in sex (P = 0.09), work experience (P = 0.71) and number of THAs performed per year (P = 0.69). Conclusions All measured assembly forces were below 4 kN, which is recommended in the literature. This could lead to increased corrosion following fretting in the head-neck interface. In addition, there was a very wide range of assembly forces among the surgeons, although other influencing factors such as different implant sizes or materials were not taken into account. To ensure optimal assembly force, the impaction should be standardized, e.g., by using an appropriate surgical instrument.

Download Full-text

Whether sutures reduce the graft laceration caused by interference screw in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction? A biomechanical study in vitro

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders ◽

10.1186/s12891-021-04457-5 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 22 (1) ◽

Author(s):

Yuanjun Teng ◽

Xiaohui Zhang ◽

Lijun Da ◽

Jie Hu ◽

Hong Wang ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Acl Reconstruction ◽

Cruciate Ligament ◽

Interference Screw ◽

Biomechanical Study ◽

Interference Screws ◽

Suture Group ◽

Anterior Cruciate ◽

Biomechanical Tests ◽

Single Insertion

Abstract Background Interference screw is commonly used for graft fixation in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. However, previous studies had reported that the insertion of interference screws significantly caused graft laceration. The purposes of this study were to (1) quantitatively evaluate the graft laceration from one single insertion of PEEK interference screws; and (2) determine whether different types of sutures reduced the graft laceration after one single insertion of interference screws in ACL reconstruction. Methods The in-vitro ACL reconstruction model was created using porcine tibias and bovine extensor digitorum tendons of bovine hind limbs. The ends of grafts were sutured using three different sutures, including the bioabsorbable, Ethibond and ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) sutures. Poly-ether-ether-ketone (PEEK) interference screws were used for tibial fixation. This study was divided into five groups (n = 10 in each group): the non-fixed group, the non-sutured group, the absorbable suture group, the Ethibond suture group and the UHMWPE suture group. Biomechanical tests were performed using the mode of pull-to-failure loading tests at 10 mm/min. Tensile stiffness (newtons per millimeter), energy absorbed to failure (in joules) and ultimate load (newtons) were recorded for analysis. Results All prepared tendons and bone specimens showed similar characteristics (length, weight, and pre-tension of the tendons, tibial bone mineral density) among all groups (P > 0.05). The biomechanical tests demonstrated that PEEK interference screws significantly caused the graft laceration (P < 0.05). However, all sutures (the bioabsorbable, Ethibond and UHMWPE sutures) did not reduce the graft laceration in ACL reconstruction (P > 0.05). Conclusions Our biomechanical study suggested that the ultimate failure load of grafts was reduced of approximately 25 % after one single insertion of a PEEK interference screw in ACL reconstruction. Suturing the ends of the grafts using different sutures (absorbable, Ethibond and UHMWPE sutures) did not decrease the graft laceration caused by interference screws.

Download Full-text

Whether Sutures Reduce the Graft Laceration Caused by Interference Screw in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction a Biomechanical Study in Vitro

10.21203/rs.3.rs-143941/v1 ◽

2021 ◽

Author(s):

Yuanjun Teng ◽

Lijun Da ◽

Xiaohui Zhang ◽

Hong Wang ◽

Hua Han ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Anterior Cruciate Ligament ◽

Acl Reconstruction ◽

Cruciate Ligament ◽

Interference Screw ◽

Biomechanical Study ◽

Protective Effects ◽

Mineral Density ◽

Interference Screws ◽

Anterior Cruciate

Abstract Background: Interference screw is commonly used for graft fixation in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction However, previous studies h a d reported that the insertion of interference screws significantly caused graft laceration . The purpose of this study was to determine whether sutures reduce d the graft laceration from the insertion of interference screws in ACL reconstruction. Methods: Porcine tibias and bovine extensor tendons were used for establishing a knee model of ACL reconstruction in vitro . The ends of grafts were sutured using three different sutures, including the bioabsorbable, Ethibond and ultra high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) sutures Poly ether ether ketone (PEEK) interference screw s w ere used fortibial fixation Biomechanical tests were performed to investigate the protective effects of different sutures on grafts Results : All prepared tendons and bone specimens showed similar characteristics (length, weight, and pre tension of the tendons, tibial bone mineral density) among all groups ( P 0.05). The biomechanical test s demonstrated that PEEK interference screw s significantly caused the graft laceration P 0.05). However, all sutures (the bioabsorbable, Ethibond and UHMWPE sutures) did not reduce the graft laceration in ACL reconstruction P 0.05). Conclusions : PEEK interference screw s significantly weakened the biomechanical properties of grafts during tibial fixation in ACL reconstruction. Absorbable Ethibond and UHMWPE sutures did not provide protective effects on grafts during ACL reconstruction.

Download Full-text