Selective bundle tensioning in double-bundle MPFL reconstruction to improve restoration of dynamic patellofemoral contact pressure

2019 ◽  
Vol 28 (4) ◽  
pp. 1144-1153
Author(s):  
N. Zumbansen ◽  
A. Haupert ◽  
D. Kohn ◽  
O. Lorbach
2014 ◽  
Vol 29 (12) ◽  
pp. 2305-2308 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takuya Konno ◽  
Tomohiro Onodera ◽  
Yusuke Nishio ◽  
Yasuhiko Kasahara ◽  
Norimasa Iwasaki ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Roopam Dey ◽  
Sarthak Patnaik ◽  
Sudesh Sivarasu

Medial Patello Femoral Ligament (MPFL) is the main stabilizer of the patellar bone in the knee complex. This fan shaped ligament prevents lateral dislocations of patella, especially during the initial 30° of knee flexion as there is minimal bony support from femur on the lateral aspect of the patella [1–2]. Patella dislocations are one of the common knee joint pathologies and it has been reported that each dislocation of the patella induces micro-tears in the MPFL [3]. It has been also observed in previous studies that there exists a very high chance of patellar re-dislocations for those individuals who have experienced the dislocation once. Complete MPFL rupture occurs in 94% of the patients suffering from repeated patellar dislocations [3–4]. Out of the 130 various methods of MPFL reconstruction, the Double Bundle Procedure is the most commonly used as it provides a larger degree of pain-free range of motion [5–8]. Locating the exact drilling location on the medial aspect of the patella and the medial femur is a challenge for the surgeon and literature suggests that the current procedure leads to non-anatomical placement of the ligament [9]. A novel device has been developed (Pat-Rig) to address the issue of locating the exact drill locations of the ligament graft tunnels into the patella [10–12]. This paper addresses the second problem of locating the femoral landmark accurately.


2009 ◽  
Vol 17 (10) ◽  
pp. 1159-1165 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christoph Becher ◽  
Thomas J. Heyse ◽  
Nadine Kron ◽  
Sven Ostermeier ◽  
Christof Hurschler ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 22 (3) ◽  
pp. 327-335 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sven Ostermeier ◽  
Marc Holst ◽  
Michael Bohnsack ◽  
Christof Hurschler ◽  
Christina Stukenborg-Colsman ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Vasileios Raoulis ◽  
Aristeidis Zibis ◽  
Apostolos Fyllos ◽  
Michael-Alexander Malahias ◽  
Konstantinos Banios ◽  
...  

Abstract Background The double-bundle technique with two points of patellar fixation in the upper half of the patella replicating the broad attachment site of the native medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) is the most commonly performed procedure for MPFL reconstruction. Complete transverse patella tunnels pose a threat to the integrity of the patella. We present an implant-free, double-bundle technique for MPFL reconstruction with gracilis autograft, overcoming the problem of complete patella bone tunnels and over-drilling. Methods After standard gracilis graft harvesting, the anteromedial side of the patella is exposed. With the guidance of an anterior-cruciate-ligament (ACL) tibia-aiming device, two 2-mm parallel guide pins are inserted from medial to lateral at the upper half of the patella. The two guide pins are over-drilled with a cannulated 4.5-mm drill bit 2-cm deep, to create two transverse blind semi-patellar tunnels. For the femoral fixation, a 2.4-mm guide pin with an eyelet is drilled at the Schöttle point and over-reamed with a 6-mm cannulated reamer to a depth of 30 mm. The two free ends of the graft (with two running Krakow sutures placed) are pulled into the two patella tunnels and the graft sutures are tied together with tension for stable graft fixation at the lateral patella rim. With the help of a femoral suture loop (which is inserted in the femoral bone tunnel), the graft-loop is advanced into the femoral bone tunnel and the graft is finally fixed with a 7-mm interference screw at 30° of knee flexion. Results The utilization of blind transverse tunnels (not trans-patellar tunnels) offers the advantage of avoiding stress risers at the patella. Thanks to the ACL tibia aiming device, multiple drilling, and breaching of the anterior patellar cortex or articular surface of the patella is avoided. Conclusions This implant-free, and consequently affordable technique, isolated or combined with bony procedures, minimizes possibilities for perioperative bony complications at the patella fixation site.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document