Dose–response relationship of duloxetine in placebo-controlled clinical trials in patients with major depressive disorder

2006 ◽  
Vol 188 (3) ◽  
pp. 273-280 ◽  
Author(s):  
Per Bech ◽  
Daniel K. Kajdasz ◽  
Vibeke Porsdal
2021 ◽  
pp. 1-10
Author(s):  
Lena Rink ◽  
Anne Adams ◽  
Cora Braun ◽  
Tom Bschor ◽  
Kathrin Kuhr ◽  
...  

<b><i>Introduction:</i></b> Selective serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRI) are among the most prescribed antidepressants, and dose escalation is a frequently applied strategy after non-response to an initially prescribed dose. <b><i>Objective:</i></b> This meta-analysis aimed to find evidence of a dose-response relationship or to the contrary in direct comparisons of different SNRI doses in patients with major depressive disorder. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> A systematic literature search for RCTs comparing at least two doses of SNRIs was carried out in CENTRAL, PubMed, PsycINFO, and EMBASE. Doses were classified as high, medium, and low according to manufacturers’ product monographs and analyses at the level of SNRIs as a group and for single substances, accompanied by sensitivity network meta-analyses (Prospero CRD42018081031). <b><i>Results:</i></b> From 2,070 studies screened, we included 26 studies with a total of 10,242 patients. Comparisons of medium versus low and high versus medium doses resulted in clinically and statistically non-significant standardized mean differences of –0.06 (–0.16 to 0.04) and –0.06 (–0.16 to 0.03) in favor of higher doses. In the analyses of single substances, no statistically significant results emerged, and many contrasts yielded very small effect sizes. Dropouts due to side effects tended to be more frequent with higher doses. Heterogeneity was low. Network meta-analyses of direct comparisons supported the findings, as did a risk of bias analysis. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> Based on the lack of positive evidence for a dose-response relationship in SNRIs as a group and in single SNRIs, we recommend prescribing medium doses. In case of insufficient response, we do not recommend increasing the dose of SNRIs.


2005 ◽  
Vol 20 (5) ◽  
pp. 327-341 ◽  
Author(s):  
James I. Hudson ◽  
Madelaine M. Wohlreich ◽  
Daniel K. Kajdasz ◽  
Craig H. Mallinckrodt ◽  
John G. Watkin ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 386 ◽  
pp. 112594
Author(s):  
Fang Wang ◽  
Xiaohui Wu ◽  
Jerry Gao ◽  
Yongchao Li ◽  
Yuncheng Zhu ◽  
...  

1988 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 129-132 ◽  
Author(s):  
J.C. Sherlock ◽  
M.J. Quinn

Wide discrepancies have been observed between controlled and uncontrolled intake studies of the relationship of blood mercury concentration to intake of mercury. The probable reason for the apparent discrepancies is that the within-subject variation of mercury intake in the uncontrolled studies was almost certainly considerably larger than the within-subject variation in blood mercury concentration; in these circumstances, the apparent slope obtained from a linear regression of blood mercury on intake will invariably be much smaller than the true slope. Studies of the exposure or intake of any substance should therefore include a consideration of the likely within-subject variation in the exposure or intake relative to that in the effect.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document