Investigating the psychopharmacology of cognitive affective bias in rats using an affective tone discrimination task

2012 ◽  
Vol 226 (3) ◽  
pp. 601-613 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael H. Anderson ◽  
Marcus R. Munafò ◽  
Emma S. J. Robinson
Author(s):  
Lasse Pelzer ◽  
Christoph Naefgen ◽  
Robert Gaschler ◽  
Hilde Haider

AbstractDual-task costs might result from confusions on the task-set level as both tasks are not represented as distinct task-sets, but rather being integrated into a single task-set. This suggests that events in the two tasks are stored and retrieved together as an integrated memory episode. In a series of three experiments, we tested for such integrated task processing and whether it can be modulated by regularities between the stimuli of the two tasks (across-task contingencies) or by sequential regularities within one of the tasks (within-task contingencies). Building on the experimental approach of feature binding in action control, we tested whether the participants in a dual-tasking experiment will show partial-repetition costs: they should be slower when only the stimulus in one of the two tasks is repeated from Trial n − 1 to Trial n than when the stimuli in both tasks repeat. In all three experiments, the participants processed a visual-manual and an auditory-vocal tone-discrimination task which were always presented concurrently. In Experiment 1, we show that retrieval of Trial n − 1 episodes is stable across practice if the stimulus material is drawn randomly. Across-task contingencies (Experiment 2) and sequential regularities within a task (Experiment 3) can compete with n − 1-based retrieval leading to a reduction of partial-repetition costs with practice. Overall the results suggest that participants do not separate the processing of the two tasks, yet, within-task contingencies might reduce integrated task processing.


Neuroreport ◽  
2000 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 333-336 ◽  
Author(s):  
Satoshi Takeuchi ◽  
Eiichi Jodo ◽  
Yoshiaki Suzuki ◽  
Tomohiko Matsuki ◽  
Ken-Yo Hoshino ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 224 (17) ◽  
Author(s):  
Megan J. McAllister ◽  
Rachel L. Blair ◽  
J. Maxwell Donelan ◽  
Jessica C. Selinger

ABSTRACT Gait adaptations, in response to novel environments, devices or changes to the body, can be driven by the continuous optimization of energy expenditure. However, whether energy optimization involves implicit processing (occurring automatically and with minimal cognitive attention), explicit processing (occurring consciously with an attention-demanding strategy) or both in combination remains unclear. Here, we used a dual-task paradigm to probe the contributions of implicit and explicit processes in energy optimization during walking. To create our primary energy optimization task, we used lower-limb exoskeletons to shift people's energetically optimal step frequency to frequencies lower than normally preferred. Our secondary task, designed to draw explicit attention from the optimization task, was an auditory tone discrimination task. We found that adding this secondary task did not prevent energy optimization during walking; participants in our dual-task experiment adapted their step frequency toward the optima by an amount and at a rate similar to participants in our previous single-task experiment. We also found that performance on the tone discrimination task did not worsen when participants were adapting toward energy optima; accuracy scores and reaction times remained unchanged when the exoskeleton altered the energy optimal gaits. Survey responses suggest that dual-task participants were largely unaware of the changes they made to their gait during adaptation, whereas single-task participants were more aware of their gait changes yet did not leverage this explicit awareness to improve gait adaptation. Collectively, our results suggest that energy optimization involves implicit processing, allowing attentional resources to be directed toward other cognitive and motor objectives during walking.


2017 ◽  
Vol 83 (5) ◽  
pp. 894-906 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin Lachmair ◽  
Ulrike Cress ◽  
Tim Fissler ◽  
Simone Kurek ◽  
Jan Leininger ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document