scholarly journals Some new monotonicity formulas and the singular set in the lower dimensional obstacle problem

2009 ◽  
Vol 177 (2) ◽  
pp. 415-461 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicola Garofalo ◽  
Arshak Petrosyan
Author(s):  
Agnid Banerjee ◽  
Donatella Danielli ◽  
Nicola Garofalo ◽  
Arshak Petrosyan

AbstractWe study the singular set in the thin obstacle problem for degenerate parabolic equations with weight $$|y|^a$$ | y | a for $$a \in (-1,1)$$ a ∈ ( - 1 , 1 ) . Such problem arises as the local extension of the obstacle problem for the fractional heat operator $$(\partial _t - \Delta _x)^s$$ ( ∂ t - Δ x ) s for $$s \in (0,1)$$ s ∈ ( 0 , 1 ) . Our main result establishes the complete structure and regularity of the singular set of the free boundary. To achieve it, we prove Almgren-Poon, Weiss, and Monneau type monotonicity formulas which generalize those for the case of the heat equation ($$a=0$$ a = 0 ).


2020 ◽  
Vol 0 (0) ◽  
Author(s):  
Matteo Focardi ◽  
Emanuele Spadaro

AbstractBuilding upon the recent results in [M. Focardi and E. Spadaro, On the measure and the structure of the free boundary of the lower-dimensional obstacle problem, Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 230 2018, 1, 125–184] we provide a thorough description of the free boundary for the solutions to the fractional obstacle problem in {\mathbb{R}^{n+1}} with obstacle function φ (suitably smooth and decaying fast at infinity) up to sets of null {{\mathcal{H}}^{n-1}} measure. In particular, if φ is analytic, the problem reduces to the zero obstacle case dealt with in [M. Focardi and E. Spadaro, On the measure and the structure of the free boundary of the lower-dimensional obstacle problem, Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 230 2018, 1, 125–184] and therefore we retrieve the same results:(i)local finiteness of the {(n-1)}-dimensional Minkowski content of the free boundary (and thus of its Hausdorff measure),(ii){{\mathcal{H}}^{n-1}}-rectifiability of the free boundary,(iii)classification of the frequencies and of the blowups up to a set of Hausdorff dimension at most {(n-2)} in the free boundary.Instead, if {\varphi\in C^{k+1}(\mathbb{R}^{n})}, {k\geq 2}, similar results hold only for distinguished subsets of points in the free boundary where the order of contact of the solution with the obstacle function φ is less than {k+1}.


2019 ◽  
Vol 25 ◽  
pp. 39
Author(s):  
Francesco Geraci

In this paper we give a proof of an epiperimetric inequality in the setting of the lower dimensional obstacle problem. The inequality was introduced by Weiss [Invent. Math.138(1999) 23–50) for the classical obstacle problem and has striking consequences concerning the regularity of the free-boundary. Our proof follows the approach of Focardi and Spadaro [Adv. Differ. Equ.21(2015) 153–200] which uses an homogeneity approach and aΓ-convergence analysis.


2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (2) ◽  
pp. 159-167
Author(s):  
Maria Colombo ◽  
Luca Spolaor ◽  
Bozhidar Velichkov

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document