Invited Discussion on: The Aetiopathogenesis of Late Inflammatory Reactions (LIRs) After Soft Tissue Filler Use: A Systematic Review of the Literature

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bianca Knoll
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Review Of The Literature ◽  
Inflammatory Reactions ◽  
Soft Tissue Filler

The Patient Experience with Soft Tissue Sarcoma: A Systematic Review of the Literature

2016 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 153-162 ◽  
Author(s):  
Randall Winnette ◽  
Lisa M. Hess ◽  
Steven J. Nicol ◽  
Datchen Fritz Tai ◽  
Catherine Copley-Merriman
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Soft Tissue Sarcoma ◽  
Patient Experience ◽  
Review Of The Literature

27803 Soft tissue dermal filler–associated necrosis: A systematic review of the literature

2021 ◽  
Vol 85 (3) ◽  
pp. AB39
Author(s):  
Kathryn Rentfro ◽  
Dillon Clarey ◽  
Marissa Lobl ◽  
Emily Glenn ◽  
Ronald Sulewski ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Dermal Filler ◽  
Review Of The Literature

scholarly journals Hemostatic agents in periapical surgery: The systematic review

2021 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. 184-187
Author(s):  
Z. S. Khabadze ◽  
D. A. Nazarova ◽  
E. S. Shilyaeva ◽  
A. P. Kotelnikova ◽  
Yu. A. Bakayev ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Calcium Sulfate ◽  
Scientific Evidence ◽  
Biological Response ◽  
Publication Date ◽  
Review Of The Literature ◽  
Inclusion Criteria ◽  
Inflammatory Reactions ◽  
Hemostatic Agents ◽  
Number Of Publications

Several agents have been used to secure hemostasis during periapical surgery. Their efficacy, biological response and side effects differ from each other.Aim. Of this review article is to assess systematically the available scientific evidence about the clinical response after using hemostatic agents during apical surgery.Materials and methods. The study of publications was produced in the electronic databases such as Google Scholar, PubMed during a systematic review of the literature. Included articles contain information about using hemostatic agents during periapical surgery and their adverse effects. The publication date criterion was selected from January 2006 to September 2021.Results. 55 articles were viewed during the review. After analyzing the literature for inclusion criteria, the total number of publications has become 10.Conclusions. According to literature data, different hemostatic agents are used during periapical surgery, but there weren’t any inflammatory reactions while using calcium sulfate.

Venous Flaps for Revascularization and Soft-Tissue Coverage in Traumatic Hand Injuries: A Systematic Review of the Literature

2019 ◽  
Vol 36 (02) ◽  
pp. 104-109
Author(s):  
John M. Roberts ◽  
Logan W. Carr ◽  
Christopher T. Haley ◽  
Randy M. Hauck ◽  
Brett F. Michelotti
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Hand Injuries ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Soft Tissue Coverage ◽  
Review Of The Literature ◽  
Flap Survival ◽  
Venous Flaps ◽  
Arterial Inflow ◽  
Venous Flap

Background The use of the venous flap for simultaneous revascularization and coverage of soft tissue defects has been documented in the literature for over 30 years. First described in 1981, Nakayama et al demonstrated that a vein and overlying skin, or a venous flap, may be transposed from one area of the body to another with complete survival of the graft. The aim of this study was to conduct a systematic review of the literature to determine predictors of venous flap survival in traumatic hand injuries. Methods A literature search of PubMed, MEDLINE, and Cochrane Library was performed with emphasis on venous flap use in traumatic hand injuries. MeSH terms included: vein graft, revascularization, venous flow through flap, arterialized venous flap, bypass, replantation, amputation, avulsion, trauma, injury, amputate, finger, hand, and thumb. Results Forty-three articles were collected that contained data on 626 free venous flaps. Most patients were males (73.9) and injured their right hand (52.3%). The forearm was the most commonly used venous flap donor site (83.6%), and most of the skin paddles were 10 to 25 cm2 (41.1%). Arterial inflow was used in 93.1% of the flaps. Most venous flaps (79.6%) healed without superficial tissue loss or necrosis. Ninety-two (14.7%) flaps had partial loss while 36 (5.8%) flaps did not survive. Conclusion The use of venous flaps for concomitant revascularization and soft tissue coverage of the hand permits good results with limited morbidity. The overall flap survival rate is nearly 95%. Younger patients whose flaps have arterial inflow and skin paddles of medium size (10–25 cm2) have the best chance for survival.

scholarly journals Systematic Review of Soft-tissue Filler–associated Blindness

2019 ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Bahareh Abtahi-Naeini ◽  
Mohsen Pourazizi ◽  
Ali Saffaei
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Soft Tissue Filler
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document