10-Year Oncologic Outcomes After Laparoscopic or Open Total Mesorectal Excision for Rectal Cancer

2016 ◽  
Vol 40 (12) ◽  
pp. 3052-3062 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marco E. Allaix ◽  
Giuseppe Giraudo ◽  
Alessia Ferrarese ◽  
Alberto Arezzo ◽  
Fabrizio Rebecchi ◽  
...  
2017 ◽  
Vol 30 (05) ◽  
pp. 333-338 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zaher Lakkis ◽  
Yves Panis

AbstractThe curative treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer is currently based on chemoradiotherapy and total mesorectal excision (TME). Laparoscopy has developed considerably because of obvious clinical benefits such as reduced pain and shorter hospital stay. Recently, several prospective randomized clinical trials with long-term follow-up have showed that laparoscopy is noninferior to laparotomy with the same oncologic outcomes in terms of survival and local control rate. However, laparoscopic TME remains a challenging procedure requiring a high level of expertise and a long learning curve to ensure an adequate and safe resection. The only relative contraindication of laparoscopic rectal surgery is T4 rectal cancer extended beyond the plane of TME. In this situation, it is reasonable to consider an open resection to avoid an uncomplete resection. In obese and elderly patients, laparoscopic TME also provides the same benefits as in nonobese and younger patients but may be more difficult to achieve. This review summarizes current knowledge on the place of laparoscopic TME in the treatment of rectal cancer.


2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 36-41 ◽  
Author(s):  
Liang Kang ◽  
Yuan-Guang Chen ◽  
Hao Zhang ◽  
Hong-Yu Zhang ◽  
Guo-Le Lin ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Transanal total mesorectal excision (taTME) has recently emerged as a promising novel surgical procedure for rectal cancer. It is believed to hold the potential advantage of providing better access to mobilize the distal rectum and achieving better pathologic results. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of taTME for rectal cancer and summarize the preliminary experience in 10 Chinese hospitals. Methods A total of 211 patients were enrolled in this study. Variables for evaluation of safety, feasibility, and oncologic outcomes were retrospectively collected and analysed. Results The median distance between the tumor and the anal verge was 5.9 cm (range, 1.5–12 cm). The median operating time was 280 min (range, 70–600 min) and the median estimated intra-operative blood loss was 50 mL (range, 10–1,500 mL). The overall rate of complication was 27.9%. Among the 211 patients, 175 (82.9%) had complete TME and 33 (15.6%) had near complete TME. The circumferential resection margin was negative in 97.7% of patients. The patients were followed for a median of 35 months (range, 2–86 months). There was 7.6% (16) mortality, 6.2% (13) had local recurrence, and 12.8% (27) had systemic recurrence. Kaplan–Meier survival analysis showed that 1-, 2-, and 3-year disease-free survival rates were 94.8%, 89.3%, and 80.2%, respectively, and 1-, 2-, and 3-year OS rates were 97.4%, 95.7%, and 92.9%, respectively. Conclusions Although limited by its retrospective nature, taTME was safe and feasible in selected patients. Future work with rigorous data recording is warranted.


2010 ◽  
Vol 251 (5) ◽  
pp. 882-886 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeong-Heum Baek ◽  
Shaun McKenzie ◽  
Julio Garcia-Aguilar ◽  
Alessio Pigazzi

2021 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Justin A. Maykel ◽  
Sue J. Hahn ◽  
Catherine Beauharnais ◽  
David C. Meyer ◽  
Susanna S. Hill ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document