scholarly journals Endovascular Treatment of Spontaneous and Isolated Infrarenal Acute Aortic Syndrome with Unibody Aortic Stent-Grafts

2020 ◽  
Vol 44 (12) ◽  
pp. 4267-4274
Author(s):  
Felice Pecoraro ◽  
Ettore Dinoto ◽  
Domenico Mirabella ◽  
Francesca Ferlito ◽  
Arduino Farina ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Endovascular Treatment ◽  
Stent Graft ◽  
Abdominal Aorta ◽  
Infrarenal Aorta ◽  
Acute Aortic Syndrome ◽  
Technical Success ◽  
Stent Grafts ◽  
Femoral Access ◽  
Persistent Symptoms

Abstract Introduction Spontaneous acute aortic syndrome (IAAS) is rarely localized in the infrarenal aorta. The endovascular approach is preferred over conventional open surgery with fewer complications. However, dedicated endovascular devices for IAAS treatment are unavailable. The aim was to report a large single-center experience using unibody stent-grafts to address IAAS. Methods From April 2016 to March 2019, a retrospective analysis of patients presenting spontaneous and isolated IAAS was performed. Patients addressed with the unibody stent-graft (AFX endovascular AAA system; Endologix Inc., Irvine, CA) were included in the study. Indications to IAAS treatment were persistent symptoms and/or dilated abdominal aorta (>3 cm). The measured outcomes were technical success; early outcomes (<30 days) including mortality, morbidity, symptoms recurrence, and endoleak occurrence; and late outcomes (>30 days) including mortality, symptoms recurrence, endoleak occurrence, stent-graft patency, and survival. Median follow-up was 23.77 ± 10 months. Results Twenty-one patients with IAAS were included. Indications to treatment were symptoms in 14 (67%) patients and dilated abdominal aorta in 7 (33%). Technical success was achieved in all cases. No perioperative mortality and 1 (4.8%) early femoral access complication was encountered. During the follow-up were registered 1 (4.8%) aortic unrelated death and 1 (4.8%) stent-graft limb stenosis. The 36 months estimated survival and freedom from reintervention were 92% (CI: 37–43; SE: 1.7) and 94% (CI: 37–44; SE: 1.7), respectively. Conclusions The endovascular treatment of IAAS with unibody stent-graft (AFX endovascular AAA system; Endologix Inc.) is safe and effective with promising mid-term outcomes. The use of unibody stent-grafts expands the endovascular indication, despite the usual anatomic IAAS features. Larger studies with longer follow-up are required to validate the outcomes of the reported technique.

Transbrachial and transfemoral approaches combined with visceral protection for the treatment of juxtarenal aortoiliac occlusive disease: Technical issues and clinical outcomes

Vascular ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 170853812110232
Author(s):  
Peixian Gao ◽  
Changliang Li ◽  
Xuejun Wu ◽  
Gang Li ◽  
Dianning Dong ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Endovascular Treatment ◽  
Bare Metal Stents ◽  
Covered Stent ◽  
Occlusive Disease ◽  
Metal Stents ◽  
Infrarenal Aorta ◽  
Bare Metal ◽  
Stent Grafts ◽  
Aortoiliac Occlusive Disease

Purpose To evaluate the safety and efficacy of transbrachial and transfemoral approaches combined with visceral protection for the endovascular treatment of juxtarenal aortoiliac occlusive disease (AIOD) over an average 19-month follow-up period. Methods In this retrospective analysis, all patients with juxtarenal AIOD at a single institution were reviewed from June 2015 to January 2020. Patient characteristics, angiographic results, and follow-up outcomes were retrospectively recorded. The indications for treatment were critical limb threatening ischemia in 12 patients and bilateral claudication in five patients. Percutaneous access via the left brachial artery was first obtained to recanalize the infrarenal occluded lesions. After that, femoral accesses were achieved. A 4-Fr catheter, a 4 mm balloon, or a 6-Fr 90-cm-long sheath was used to complete visceral artery protection. Results A total of 17 juxtarenal AIOD patients (14 males; mean age, 63.4 ± 8.1 years) underwent endovascular treatment. The technical success rate was 100%. Complete reconstruction was achieved in 15 (88.2%) patients. The infrarenal aorta was reconstructed with kissing covered stent grafts ( n = 7), kissing bare-metal stents ( n = 2), covered stent grafts ( n = 2), bare-metal stents ( n = 1), or the off-label use of iliac limb stent grafts ( n = 5). Renal embolization was found in 3 (17.6%) patients during intraoperative angiography. There was 1 (5.9%) case of distal runoff embolization after CDT and 1 (5.9%) case of left iliac artery rupture. One (5.9%) death occurred due to acute myocardial infarction 20 days after the operation. The average follow-up period was 19.3 ± 16.7 months (range, 1–54 months) in the remaining 16 cases. The renal artery patency rate was 100%. The estimated cumulative primary patency rates were 92.3% at 12 months and 59.3% at 36 months according to the Kaplan–Meier method. Conclusions Transbrachial and transfemoral approaches combined with visceral protection offer a safe and effective alternative to open revascularization for the endovascular treatment of juxtarenal AIOD.

The Evaluation of Aortic Diameter Changes During Long-Term Follow-Up After Endovascular Treatment of Acute Blunt Traumatic Thoracic Aortic Injuries

2018 ◽  
Vol 52 (5) ◽  
pp. 335-343 ◽  
Author(s):  
Federico Fontana ◽  
Edoardo Macchi ◽  
Filippo Piacentino ◽  
Larissa Nocchi Cardim ◽  
Giuseppe De Marchi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Endovascular Treatment ◽  
Stent Graft ◽  
Mean Value ◽  
Aortic Diameter ◽  
Long Term Results ◽  
Technical Success ◽  
Long Term Follow Up ◽  
Aortic Injuries

Purpose: To evaluate the variations in aortic diameters and long-term results in patients who underwent thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for acute blunt traumatic thoracic aortic injuries (BTTAIs). Materials and Methods: We retrospectively evaluated 23 patients with a mean age of 39 years (range: 17-74 years) who underwent TEVAR for BTTAI between October 2000 and November 2014. All of the patients underwent computed tomography angiography (CTA) before hospital discharge as a baseline imaging for the subsequent follow-up examinations. The technical success, overall survival, and complications were evaluated. Furthermore, the aortic diameters outside of the stent-graft (1 cm proximal and 1 cm distal to the stent-graft) and the aortic diameters within the stent-graft (2 cm distal to the proximal end and 2 cm proximal to the distal end) were assessed. The diameters at baseline on CTA were compared with those of the latest available follow-up examination. Results: Technical success was 100% with a mean follow-up of 65.4 months (range: 12-171 months). No death was registered, and 2 (8.7%) of 23 endograft-related complications (1 stent-graft distal infolding and 1 endoleak 2 and 4 months after the procedure, respectively) were observed. An increase in aortic diameter either proximal or distal to the stent-graft (mean value 0.7 and 0.5 mm, respectively) or within the stent-graft (mean value of 0.5 mm for both proximal and distal diameters) was registered (mean follow-up at 65.4 months, range: 12-171 months). Conclusion: Aortic dilatation following TEVAR for BTTAI is minimal during long-term follow-up. Endovascular treatment represents a durable and safe option in acute BTTAIs.

Outcomes of Total Endovascular Aortic Arch Repair with Surgeon-Modified Fenestrated Stent-Grafts on Zone 0 Landing for Aortic Arch Pathologies

2021 ◽  
pp. 152660282110364
Author(s):  
Xiaoye Li ◽  
Lei Zhang ◽  
Chao Song ◽  
Hao Zhang ◽  
Shibo Xia ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Aortic Arch ◽  
Stent Graft ◽  
Artery Occlusion ◽  
Technical Success ◽  
Stent Grafts ◽  
Landing Zone ◽  
Subclavian Artery Occlusion ◽  
Fenestrated Stent Graft ◽  
Aortic Arch Repair

Objectives This study evaluated the feasibility and safety of total endovascular aortic arch repair with surgeon-modified fenestrated stent-graft on zone 0 landing for aortic arch pathologies. Methods Between June 2016 and October 2019, 37 consecutive patients underwent total endovascular arch repair with surgeon-modified fenestrated stent-grafts on zone 0 landing. Outcomes included technical success, perioperative and follow-up morbidity and mortality, and branch artery patency. Results During the study period, 37 patients were treated with total endovascular aortic arch repair with surgeon-modified fenestrated stent-graft. Twenty-one (56.8%) patients were diagnosed with aortic dissections, 15 (40.5%) patients with aneurysms, and 1 (2.7%) patient required reintervention due to endoleak and sac expansion from previous thoracic endovascular aortic repair for thoracoabdominal aneurysm. The proximal landing zone for all patients were in zone 0, and all branch arteries of aortic arch were reconstructed. Technical success was achieved in 34 cases (91.9%). Three (8.1%) patients had fenestrations misaligned with target arteries, and the chimney technique was applied as a complementary measure. Thirty-day mortality rate was 5.4% (n=2). Thirty-day stroke rate was 5.4% (n=2). Thirty-day reintervention rate was 2.7% (n=1). At a median follow-up of 20 months (range, 3–49 months), 5 (13.5%) patients died, including 2 aortic-related deaths, 1 nonaortic-related death, and 2 deaths of unknown reason. One (2.7%) patient had stroke. Four patients (10.8%) had reintervention during the follow-up, including 2 cases of left subclavian artery occlusion and 2 cases of type II endoleak. The estimated survival (±SE) at 2 years was 72.4%±9.7% (95% CI 53.4%–91.4%). The estimated freedom from reintervention (±SE) at 2 years was 87.4%±5.9% (95% CI 75.84%–98.96%). Conclusions Total endovascular aortic arch repair with surgeon-modified fenestrated stent-grafts on zone 0 landing is an alternate option for the treatment of aortic arch pathologies in experienced centers.

Endovascular treatment of extracranial carotid artery aneurysms using self-expandable covered stent grafts: A single center retrospective study

Vascular ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 170853812199012
Author(s):  
Peixian Gao ◽  
Jiaxin Qi ◽  
Mo Wang ◽  
Gang Li ◽  
Le Yang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Carotid Artery ◽  
Endovascular Treatment ◽  
Stent Graft ◽  
Common Carotid Artery ◽  
Covered Stent ◽  
Imaging Features ◽  
Stent Grafts ◽  
Extracranial Carotid Artery ◽  
Covered Stent Graft

Objectives This study was aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of endovascular treatment of extracranial carotid artery aneurysms (ECAAs) using self-expandable covered stent grafts. Methods All patients with ECAA at a single institution were reviewed from February 2014 to February 2020. Eight consecutive patients (three men, mean age 64.5 years) treated with endovascular repair with self-expandable covered stent graft were retrospectively reviewed. Patient characteristics, angiographic results, and follow-up outcomes were retrospectively recorded. Access to ECAA was gained via a femoral approach or a direct puncture of common carotid artery after surgical exposure because of kinking of the aortic arch and common carotid artery. A self-expandable covered stent graft (Viabahn; W. L. Gore, Flagstaff, AZ) was deployed to exclude the aneurysm. Results Based on imaging features, there were five peudoaneurysms and three true aneurysms. The technical success rate was 100%. Cerebral protection devices were not used in all the patients during the procedures. Immediate absolute obliteration of the ECAA with no endoleak was documented in all the patients. Perioperative complications included one internal carotid-cavernous sinus fistula, one bleeding at the puncture site, and one stroke. The mean follow-up period was 35.5 months (range, 9–72 months). All the patients were alive, with an obligation rate of 100%. No transient ischemia attack, stroke, or reoccurrence of symptoms was identified during the follow-up period. Radiological examinations identified patency of the stent grafts and revealed no endoleaks, stent fracture, stent migration, or aneurysm rupture. Conclusions Endovascular treatment of ECAAs with self-expandable covered stent grafts appears to be a safe and feasible alternative for traditional open surgery, especially in the challenging anatomy and instable physical conditions. Although cerebrovascular accidents can occur as the result of hemodynamic changes during the perioperative period, the minimal alternative can yield satisfactory midterm follow-up clinical outcomes.

A Laparoscopic Approach to the Abdominal Aorta for Thoracic Stent-Graft Deployment: Evaluation in a Porcine Model

2002 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 344-349 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maxime Formichi ◽  
Jean-François Renier
Keyword(s):  
Thoracic Aorta ◽  
Stent Graft ◽  
Abdominal Aorta ◽  
Laparoscopic Approach ◽  
Infrarenal Aorta ◽  
Stent Grafts ◽  
Graft Placement ◽  
Stent Grafting ◽  
Laparoscopic Techniques ◽  
Totally Laparoscopic

Purpose: To develop laparoscopic techniques for aortic stent-graft placement as an alternative to the femoral approach. Methods: Endovascular stent-grafts were placed in 8 pigs via a totally laparoscopic retroperitoneal approach. After needle puncture, a guidewire was inserted into the abdominal aorta, followed by an 18-F sheath through which a Talent stent-graft was deployed in the descending thoracic aorta without aortic clamping. All the endovascular tools were inserted into the retroperitoneal area via the ports. After the sheath was withdrawn, hemostasis was achieved by suturing the aortic puncture under aortic cross-clamping. After sacrificing the animals, the thoracic aorta was removed to verify the position and deployment of the stent-grafts. Results: Seven (87.5%) of 8 procedures were successfully completed; the first animal died from hemorrhage due to inadvertent injury to the posterior infrarenal aortic wall. The accurate deployment and position of the stent-grafts were verified visually after sacrifice. Mean (± SD) procedural, implantation, and aortic cross-clamping times were 205 ± 56, 22 ± 9, and 30 ± 19 minutes, respectively. Mean blood loss was 120 ± 56 mL. Conclusions: Thoracic aortic stent-grafting using a laparoscopic approach to the infrarenal aorta is feasible. More studies will be required to define the place of combined endovascular and laparoscopic procedures as an alternative to the femoral surgical approach for stent-graft placement.

scholarly journals Unibody design for aortic disease with a narrow aortic bifurcation: tips and tricks for success

2021 ◽  
Vol 20 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ricardo de Alvarenga Yoshida ◽  
Renato Fanchiotti Costa ◽  
Débora Ortigosa Cunha ◽  
Rafael Mendes Palhares ◽  
Rodrigo Gibin Jaldin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Management ◽  
Stent Graft ◽  
Abdominal Aorta ◽  
Aortic Aneurysms ◽  
Technical Success ◽  
Shaggy Aorta ◽  
Stent Grafting ◽  
Aortic Pathology ◽  
Stent Graft Repair

Abstract Background Surgical management of patients with abdominal aortic diseases associated with distal narrowing is a challenging situation. Objectives To evaluate outcomes of unibody bifurcated endovascular stent graft repair. Methods This is a retrospective, observational, multi-institutional database study of a cohort of consecutive cases, approved by the local Ethics Committee. Records were reviewed of patients diagnosed from 2010 to 2020 with “shaggy” aorta, saccular aneurysm, penetrating aortic ulcer, and isolated aortic dissection located in the infrarenal abdominal aorta. All patients were treated with a unibody bifurcated stent graft. Main outcomes were technical success, procedure complications, long-term patency, and mortality in the follow-up period up to 5 years. Data on demographics, comorbidities, surgical management, and outcomes were analyzed. Results Twenty-three patients were treated with unibody bifurcated stent graft repair, including 7 cases of “shaggy” aorta, 3 isolated dissections of the abdominal aorta, 4 penetrating aortic ulcers, and 9 saccular aneurysms. Immediate technical success was achieved in 100% of cases. At follow-up, all stent grafts remained patent and there were no limb occlusions. The patients were symptom-free and reported no complications related to the procedure. There were 5 deaths during the follow-up period (median= 4 years), but none were related to the procedure and there were no aorta-related deaths. Conclusions The present study shows that unibody bifurcated stent grafting is safe and effective in this group of patients with narrow distal abdominal aorta and complex aortic pathology. The results were similar for both infrarenal aortic aneurysms and aorto-iliac atherosclerotic disease.

scholarly journals Endovascular Aneurysm Sealing of a Collapsed and Thrombosed Aortic Stent-Graft With Renovisceral Chimney Stent-Grafts

2018 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 72-75
Author(s):  
Fabien Lareyre ◽  
Claude Mialhe ◽  
Carine Dommerc ◽  
Juliette Raffort
Keyword(s):  
Stent Graft ◽  
Mesenteric Artery ◽  
Endovascular Aneurysm Repair ◽  
Stent Grafts ◽  
Aortic Thrombosis ◽  
Aortic Stent Graft ◽  
Aneurysm Repair ◽  
Stent Graft Implantation ◽  
Graft Implantation

Purpose: To report the use of the Nellix endovascular aneurysm sealing (EVAS) system in the management of proximal stent-graft collapse associated with thrombosis following endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). Case Report: A 76-year-old man was admitted for proximal collapse of an aortic extension following bifurcated AFX stent-graft implantation associated with chimney grafts in both renal arteries and the superior mesenteric artery 1 month prior. Imaging identified thrombosis of the aortic stent-graft and the iliac limbs. A Nellix EVAS was placed into the AFX stent-graft to recanalize the aneurysm lumen and address the aortic thrombosis. There was no endoleak, and the renovisceral chimney stent-grafts remained patent over a follow-up of 25 months. Conclusion: While further studies are required to generalize its use, EVAS appears to be feasible in the management of aortic stent-graft collapse.

scholarly journals Endovascular repair of aortic aneurysm: Preliminary results

2009 ◽  
Vol 137 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 10-17 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lazar Davidovic ◽  
Momcilo Colic ◽  
Igor Koncar ◽  
Dejan Markovic ◽  
Dusan Kostic ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm ◽  
Aortic Aneurysm ◽  
Stent Graft ◽  
Endovascular Aneurysm Repair ◽  
Aortic Aneurysms ◽  
Endovascular Stent ◽  
Stent Grafts ◽  
Graft Thrombosis ◽  
Abdominal Aortic

Introduction. Endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) has been introduced into clinical practice at the beginning of the 90's of the last century. Because of economic, political and social problems during the last 25 years, the introduction of this procedure in Serbia was not possible. Objective. The aim of this study was to present preliminary experiences and results of the Clinic for Vascular Surgery of the Serbian Clinical Centre in Belgrade in endovascular treatment of thoracic and abdominal aortic aneurysms. Methods. The procedure was performed in 33 patients (3 female and 30 male), aged from 42 to 83 years. Ten patients had a descending thoracic aorta aneurysm (three atherosclerotic, four traumatic - three chronic and one acute as a part of polytrauma, one dissected, two penetrated atherosclerotic ulcers), while 23 patients had the abdominal aortic aneurysm, one ruptured and two isolated iliac artery aneurysms. The indications for EVAR were isthmic aneurismal localisation, aged over 80 years and associated comorbidity (cardiac, pulmonary and cerebrovasular diseases, previous thoracotomy or multiple laparotomies associated with abdominal infection, idiopatic thrombocitopaenia). All of these patients had three or more risk factors. The diagnosis was established using duplex ultrasonography, angiography and MSCT. In the case of thoracic aneurysm, a Medtronic-Valiant? endovascular stent graft was implanted, while for the abdominal aortic aneurysm Medtronic-Talent? endovascular stent grafts with delivery systems were used. In three patients, following EVAR a surgical repair of the femoral artery aneurysm was performed, and in another three patients femoro-femoral cross over bypass followed implantation of aortouniiliac stent graft. Results. During procedure and follow-up period (mean 1.6 years), there were: one death, one conversion, one endoleak type 1, six patients with endoleak type 2 that disappeared during the follow-up period, one early graft thrombosis. No other complications, including aneurysm expansion, collapse, deformity and migration of the endovascular stent grafts, were registered. Conclusion. According to all medical and economic aspects, we recommend EVAR to treat acute traumatic thoracic aortic aneurysm, as well as in elderly and high-risk patients with abdominal or thoracic aneurysms, when open surgery is related to a significantly higher mortality and morbidity.

Antegrade vs Crossover Femoral Artery Access in the Endovascular Treatment of Isolated Below-the-Knee Lesions in Patients With Critical Limb Ischemia

2017 ◽  
Vol 24 (3) ◽  
pp. 331-336 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yukun Li ◽  
Ali Esmail ◽  
Konstantinos P. Donas ◽  
Georgios Pitoulias ◽  
Giovanni Torsello ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Endovascular Treatment ◽  
Success Rate ◽  
Femoral Artery ◽  
Critical Limb Ischemia ◽  
Limb Ischemia ◽  
Technical Success ◽  
Femoral Access ◽  
Technical Success Rate ◽  
Below The Knee ◽  
Antegrade Approach

Purpose: To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of antegrade vs crossover femoral artery access in the endovascular treatment of isolated below-the-knee (BTK) lesions in patients with critical limb ischemia (CLI). Methods: Between January 2014 and December 2015, 224 high-risk patients (mean age 75.8±9.8 years; 151 men) with CLI underwent infragenicular interventions on 292 crural vessels in 3 European vascular centers. All patients had isolated TransAtlantic Inter-Society Consensus (TASC) C (n=26) or D (n=198) BTK lesions. Primary endpoints were freedom from access-related complications and technical success comparing the antegrade vs crossover access groups. Results: Balloon angioplasty was the most used treatment modality (169 vessels, 75.4%). The technical success rate was 88.4% in the entire cohort and 88.0% in the antegrade group vs 90.4% in the crossover group (p>0.99). In all patients, the technical success rate was higher for stenotic lesions (100%) vs occlusions (85.5%, p=0.002) and in patients with TASC C BTK lesions (100%) vs TASC D (86.9%, p=0.033). The overall freedom from access-related complications was 97.8%: 99% in the antegrade group and 90.6% in the crossover group (p=0.022). Larger sheath size (5/6-F vs 4-F) was associated with a significantly higher risk for access-related complications (7.1% vs 1.1%, respectively; p=0.047). Conclusion: The present multicenter study showed high technical success and a low incidence of access-related complications in the treatment of isolated BTK lesions using either antegrade or crossover femoral access. The antegrade approach with the use of a 4-F system seems to have a significantly lower rate of access-related complications.

Type IIIb Endoleak After Endovascular Aneurysm Repair Using the Zenith Stent Graft

2019 ◽  
Vol 53 (6) ◽  
pp. 515-519
Author(s):  
Toshiya Nishibe ◽  
Toru Iwahashi ◽  
Kentaro Kamiya ◽  
Masaki Kano ◽  
Keita Maruno ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stent Graft ◽  
Endovascular Aneurysm Repair ◽  
Aneurysm Rupture ◽  
Type I ◽  
Stent Grafts ◽  
System Type ◽  
Type Iiib ◽  
Type I Endoleak ◽  
Aneurysm Repair

We present 3 cases of type IIIb endoleak after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) using the Zenith stent graft system. Type III endoleak, like type I endoleak, is a high-pressure, high-risk leak that increases sac pressure up to or even above arterial pressure, and is associated with an increased frequency of open conversions or risk of aneurysm rupture. Type IIIb endoleak is rare but there is much concern that the incidence of type IIIb endoleak is likely to increase hereafter; the mechanism of type IIIb endoleak is deterioration of graft fabric in conjunction with stent sutures. Type IIIb endoleak is difficult to diagnose before rupture. The possibility of type IIIb endoleak should be highly suspected when the continued growth of an excluded aneurysm sac without direct radiologic evidence is observed during follow-up. Type IIIb endoleak can be repaired by relining of the stent graft with additional stent grafts.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document