Strongyloides stercoralis hyperinfection syndrome in mantle cell lymphoma in post-transplant setting

Author(s):  
Kamal Kant Sahu ◽  
Kedar Mahagaokar ◽  
Bhavin Patel ◽  
Daniel Winokur ◽  
Sakiko Suzuki ◽  
...  
Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 2127-2127 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sven Armin Sommerfeld ◽  
Samar Kulkarni ◽  
David Kaye ◽  
Adrian Bloor

Abstract Introduction Conditioning regimens in autologous stem cell transplantation for lymphoma are evolving constantly. Commonly used regimens in the UK include BEAM, CBV, LEAM and LACE. Carmustine and Lomustine are alkylating agents and nitrosourea analogues with a history of use in the context of conditioning for autologous stem cell transplantation. The BEAM conditioning regimen [ BCNU (300mg/msg day -6), Etoposide (200mg/msq o.d. day -5 to day -2) , Cytarabine (200mg/msq b.d. day -5 to day -2) and Melphalan 140 mg/msq day -1 ] was replaced in our institution by LEAM [ Lomustine (300mg/msq p.o day -6) ; remaining agents and dosing unchanged ] after 2010 due to issues of limited availability of BCNU and concerns regarding its potential pulmonary toxicity. To our knowledge there has been no published comparison of the efficacy of LEAM and BEAM regimens. Materials and methods We reviewed our institutions transplant database and electronic records of patients transplanted with either conditioning regime between the dates of 1.6.2002 and 1.6.2012 in order to capture sufficient numbers of patients with both regimens. We compared the 2 patient groups for engraftment data, treatment related mortality, survival data and the clinical status 1 year post transplant. The status at one year post transplant was reviewed in patients with Hodgins Disease, Mantle Cell Lymphoma and relapsed or transformed Follicular Lymphoma and Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma. For comparison, 2x2 contingency table analysis using Fisher’s exact test calculating a two tailed p value was undertaken. Results 150 Patients received BEAM conditioning and 56 patients received LEAM conditioning. The transplant dates in the BEAM group were between 25.6.2002 and 20.03.2012, in LEAM between 22.04.2010 and 29.5.2012. Demographics: Average patient age 48.1 years, M:F ratio 2.12. Disease groups were similarly represented with the exception of Mantle Cell Lymphoma (10% of BEAM transplants, 20% of LEAM transplants). Engraftment was similar. The causes of death by day 100 in the BEAM group (TRM 100 = 4.67%) were pneumonia (3), sepsis (1), relapse (1), myocardial infarction (1) and TRM out of hospital (1). In the LEAM group (TRM 100 = 1.8%) there was a single death from pneumonia. Relapse from previous CR (1.5% overall) occurred in 2 patients transplanted for DLBCL in the BEAM group (0.97%) and one patient transplanted for a T-cell lymphoma in the LEAM group (1.79%). 34 % of patients were alive and in CR at 1 year in the BEAM group as opposed to 50% in the LEAM group. The rates of death at 1 year were similar (BEAM 17.3%, LEAM 14.3%) with a lesser number of deaths of HD patients transplanted with LEAM (7.1%) compared to BEAM (20%). No differences were statistically significant. Discussion The data for treatment related mortality, overall survival and engraftment are similar between the two groups, with some trends favoring LEAM. In summary the experience at our centre indicates that replacing BCNU with CCNU in conditioning combined with Etoposide, Cytarabine and Melphalan (BEAM vs LEAM) is safe and has at least equivalent efficacy with regards to engraftment, transplant related morbidity, relapse rates and survival. Conclusion LEAM conditioning is a feasible alternative to BEAM. Disclosures: Bloor: GSK: Consultancy, Honoraria, Paid speaker Other.


2010 ◽  
Vol 52 (4) ◽  
pp. 221-224 ◽  
Author(s):  
Renzo Nino Incani ◽  
Marcos Hernández ◽  
María Elena González

The first report to our knowledge, of hyperinfection by Strongyloides stercoralis (HS) and hypereosinophilia, associated to immune suppression by Rituximab (the only drug received for the last one year and 10 months), in a patient with mantle-cell lymphoma (MCL), is presented. The patient has a 3-year history of MCL, and developed two accesses of HS during 2008, including meningitis, pneumonia and presence of larvae of S. stercoralis in the lungs. We had a unique chance to look at cytotoxicity of filariform larvae in the expectoration after Ivermectin treatment, showing immobilization and death of larvae, associated with eosinophils attached to the cuticle of the parasite.


Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 2915-2915
Author(s):  
Melhem Solh ◽  
Asad Bashey ◽  
Lawrence E Morris ◽  
H. Kent Holland ◽  
Xu Zhang ◽  
...  

Abstract The routine use of autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) in first remission have significantly improved outcomes for patients with mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) (Hermann et al, jco 2009). The choice of the most appropriate induction regimen prior to transplant remains a controversial topic. Adding high dose cytarabine to RCHOP among young patients (<65 years) results in superior PFS, higher toxicity but no improvement in overall survival when compared to RCHOP alone (Hermine O et al, Lancet 2016). The use of bendamustine/Rituxan (BR) compared to RCHOP in 2 randomized studies showed lower toxicity, higher PFS but similar overall survival. In this study, we investigated the effect of induction regimen intensity and the use of high dose cytarabine on post autologous stem cell transplant outcomes among MCL patients treated at our center. 59 patients who received ASCT for MCL between 2010 and 2020 were included in this analysis. Data were retrieved from our database where it was entered prospectively. Median age at diagnosis was 60 (45,76) years, stage IV (85%), B symptoms (32%), MIPI score (low 17%, intermediate 47%, high 28%) and ECOG performance 0-1 (81%). Induction regimen included BR (n=14), RCHOP (n=11), R-Hyper CVAD (n=14), RBAC(n=2) and RCHOP/RDHAP (n=18). 85% of patients were in CR and 15% in PR at time of transplant. All patients underwent chemo mobilization with a median time from diagnosis to transplant of 251 (119,1372) days. 30 patients (51%) received post-transplant rituximab maintenance. Patients were compared into 2 groups based on the use of high dose cytarabine in their induction regimen (table 1). Patients who received high dose cytarabine were younger and had a shorter time from diagnosis to transplant that patients who were treated without cytarabine. Survival endpoints for cytarabine based and no cytarabine based induction at 5 years post-transplant were as follows OS (82% vs 69%), DFS (65% vs 50%), Non-relapse mortality (4% vs 9%) and relapse (31% vs 41%) respectively ( figure 1). A multivariable cox analysis for OS, DFS, NRM and relapse showed that cytarabine had no effect on any of the endpoints. For OS, B symptoms and worse ECOG performance at Diagnosis (>=2) were associated with worse OS. For relapse, higher MIPI score and no use of Rituxan maintenance resulted in higher relapse. In conclusion, our data shows that among MCL patients receiving ASCT, the use of more intensive cytarabine based induction does not clearly improve long-term outcomes It is possible that use of ASCT compensates for the use of a less intense induction regimen. Disease (MIPI), Patient (ECOG)characteristics and use of post-transplant maintenance are factors that contribute to post transplant outcomes. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Solh: Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Partner Therapeutics: Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy; ADCT Therapeutics: Consultancy, Research Funding.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charles Tong ◽  
Peter Papagiannopoulos ◽  
Michael Feldman ◽  
Nithin Adappa ◽  
James Palmer

2006 ◽  
Vol preprint (2007) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Kristi Smock ◽  
Hassan Yaish ◽  
Mitchell Cairo ◽  
Mark Lones ◽  
Carlynn Willmore-Payne ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document