Ku80 Gene is Related to Non-Homologous End-Joining and Genome Stability in Aspergillus niger

2011 ◽  
Vol 62 (4) ◽  
pp. 1342-1346 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jinxiang Zhang ◽  
Zhihui Mao ◽  
Wei Xue ◽  
Ying Li ◽  
Guomin Tang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Aspergillus Niger ◽  
Genome Stability ◽  
End Joining ◽  
Non Homologous End Joining

scholarly journals cGAS guards against chromosome end-to-end fusions during mitosis and facilitates replicative senescence

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaocui Li ◽  
Xiaojuan Li ◽  
Chen Xie ◽  
Sihui Cai ◽  
Mengqiu Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Genome Stability ◽  
Mitotic Chromosome ◽  
Replicative Senescence ◽  
Genome Instability ◽  
Strand Break ◽  
End Joining ◽  
Dsb Repair ◽  
End To End ◽  
Non Homologous End Joining ◽  
Sting Pathway

AbstractAs a sensor of cytosolic DNA, the role of cyclic GMP-AMP synthase (cGAS) in innate immune response is well established, yet how its functions in different biological conditions remain to be elucidated. Here, we identify cGAS as an essential regulator in inhibiting mitotic DNA double-strand break (DSB) repair and protecting short telomeres from end-to-end fusion independent of the canonical cGAS-STING pathway. cGAS associates with telomeric/subtelomeric DNA during mitosis when TRF1/TRF2/POT1 are deficient on telomeres. Depletion of cGAS leads to mitotic chromosome end-to-end fusions predominantly occurring between short telomeres. Mechanistically, cGAS interacts with CDK1 and positions them to chromosome ends. Thus, CDK1 inhibits mitotic non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) by blocking the recruitment of RNF8. cGAS-deficient human primary cells are defective in entering replicative senescence and display chromosome end-to-end fusions, genome instability and prolonged growth arrest. Altogether, cGAS safeguards genome stability by controlling mitotic DSB repair to inhibit mitotic chromosome end-to-end fusions, thus facilitating replicative senescence.

Anti-silencing factor 1A is associated with genome stability maintenance of mouse preimplantation embryos†

2020 ◽  
Vol 102 (4) ◽  
pp. 817-827
Author(s):  
Kai Deng ◽  
Wanyou Feng ◽  
Xiaohua Liu ◽  
Xiaoping Su ◽  
Erwei Zuo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Embryonic Development ◽  
Genome Stability ◽  
Mouse Embryos ◽  
Preimplantation Embryos ◽  
End Joining ◽  
Dna Damages ◽  
Developmental Potential ◽  
Damage Repair ◽  
Non Homologous End Joining ◽  
Early Mouse

Abstract Genome stability is critical for the normal development of preimplantation embryos, as DNA damages may result in mutation and even embryo lethality. Anti-silencing factor 1A (ASF1A) is a histone chaperone and enriched in the MII oocytes as a maternal factor, which may be associated with the maintenance of genome stability. Thus, this study was undertaken to explore the role of ASF1A in maintaining the genome stability of early mouse embryos. The ASF1A expressed in the preimplantation embryos and displayed a dynamic pattern throughout the early embryonic development. Inhibition of ASF1A expression decreased embryonic development and increased DNA damages. Overexpression of ASF1A improved the developmental potential and decreased DNA damages. When 293T cells that had been integrated with RGS-NHEJ were co-transfected with plasmids of pcDNA3.1-ASF1A, gRNA-NHEJ, and hCas9, less cells expressed eGFP, indicating that non-homologous end joining was reduced by ASF1A. When 293T cells were co-transfected with plasmids of HR-donor, gRNA-HR, hCas9, and pcDNA3.1-ASF1A, more cells expressed eGFP, indicating that homologous recombination (HR) was enhanced by ASF1A. These results indicate that ASF1A may be associated with the genome stability maintenance of early mouse embryos and this action may be mediated by promoting DNA damage repair through HR pathway.

scholarly journals Loss of Cdc13 causes genome instability by a deficiency in replication-dependent telomere capping

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rachel E Langston ◽  
Dominic Palazzola ◽  
Erin Bonnell ◽  
Raymund J. Wellinger ◽  
Ted Weinert
Keyword(s):  
Homologous Recombination ◽  
Genome Stability ◽  
Genome Instability ◽  
Chromosome Instability ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Temperature Sensitive ◽  
End Joining ◽  
Telomere Capping ◽  
Non Homologous End Joining

AbstractIn budding yeast, Cdc13, Stn1, and Ten1 form a telomere binding heterotrimer dubbed CST. Here we investigate the role of Cdc13/CST in maintaining genome stability, using a Chr VII disome system that can generate recombinants, loss, and enigmatic unstable chromosomes. In cells expressing a temperature sensitive CDC13 allele, cdc13F684S, unstable chromosomes frequently arise due to problems in or near a telomere. Hence, when Cdc13 is defective, passage through S phase causes Exo1-dependent ssDNA and unstable chromosomes, which then are the source for whole chromosome instability events (e.g. recombinants, chromosome truncations, dicentrics, and/or loss). Specifically, genome instability arises from a defect in Cdc13’s replication-dependent telomere capping function, not Cdc13s putative post-replication telomere capping function. Furthermore, the unstable chromosomes form without involvement of homologous recombination nor non-homologous end joining. Our data suggest that a Cdc13/CST defect in semi-conservative replication near the telomere leads to ssDNA and unstable chromosomes, which then are lost or subject to complex rearrangements. This system defines a links between replication-dependent chromosome capping and genome stability in the form of unstable chromosomes.

scholarly journals To Join or Not to Join: Decision Points Along the Pathway to Double-Strand Break Repair vs. Chromosome End Protection

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephanie M. Ackerson ◽  
Carlan Romney ◽  
P. Logan Schuck ◽  
Jason A. Stewart
Keyword(s):  
Genome Stability ◽  
Strand Break ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
End Joining ◽  
Dsb Repair ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Decision Points ◽  
Chromosome Fusions ◽  
Non Homologous End Joining ◽  
Dna Ends

The regulation of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) and telomeres are diametrically opposed in the cell. DSBs are considered one of the most deleterious forms of DNA damage and must be quickly recognized and repaired. Telomeres, on the other hand, are specialized, stable DNA ends that must be protected from recognition as DSBs to inhibit unwanted chromosome fusions. Decisions to join DNA ends, or not, are therefore critical to genome stability. Yet, the processing of telomeres and DSBs share many commonalities. Accordingly, key decision points are used to shift DNA ends toward DSB repair vs. end protection. Additionally, DSBs can be repaired by two major pathways, namely homologous recombination (HR) and non-homologous end joining (NHEJ). The choice of which repair pathway is employed is also dictated by a series of decision points that shift the break toward HR or NHEJ. In this review, we will focus on these decision points and the mechanisms that dictate end protection vs. DSB repair and DSB repair choice.

scholarly journals Meiotic DNA repair in the nucleolus employs a non-homologous end joining mechanism

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jason Sims ◽  
Gregory P. Copenhaver ◽  
Peter Schlögelhofer
Keyword(s):  
Genome Stability ◽  
Dependent Manner ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Dna Breaks ◽  
End Joining ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Meiotic Dsbs ◽  
Dna Elements ◽  
Highly Repetitive Dna ◽  
Non Homologous End Joining

AbstractRibosomal RNA genes are arranged in large arrays with hundreds of rDNA units in tandem. These highly repetitive DNA elements pose a risk to genome stability since they can undergo non-allelic exchanges. During meiosis DNA double strand breaks (DSBs) are induced as part of the regular program to generate gametes. Meiotic DSBs initiate homologous recombination (HR) which subsequently ensures genetic exchange and chromosome disjunction.In Arabidopsis thaliana we demonstrate that all 45S rDNA arrays become transcriptionally active and are recruited into the nucleolus early in meiosis. This shields the rDNA from acquiring canonical meiotic chromatin modifications, meiotic cohesin and meiosis-specific DSBs. DNA breaks within the rDNA arrays are repaired in a RAD51-independent, but LIG4-dependent manner, establishing that it is non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) that maintains rDNA integrity during meiosis. Utilizing ectopically integrated rDNA repeats we validate our findings and demonstrate that the rDNA constitutes a HR-refractory genome environment.

scholarly journals Non-homologous end joining minimizes errors by coordinating DNA processing with ligation

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benjamin M. Stinson ◽  
Andrew T. Moreno ◽  
Johannes C. Walter ◽  
Joseph J. Loparo
Keyword(s):  
Single Molecule ◽  
Genome Stability ◽  
Short Range ◽  
Genome Instability ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
End Joining ◽  
Synaptic Complex ◽  
Processing Enzymes ◽  
Non Homologous End Joining ◽  
Dna Ends

Genome stability requires efficient and faithful repair of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs). The predominant DSB repair pathway in human cells is non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ), which directly ligates DNA ends1–5. Broken DNA ends at DSBs are chemically diverse, and many are not compatible for direct ligation by the NHEJ-associated DNA Ligase IV (Lig4). To solve this problem, NHEJ end-processing enzymes including polymerases and nucleases modify ends until they are ligatable. How cells regulate end processing to minimize unnecessary genomic alterations6 during repair of pathological DSBs remains unknown. Using a biochemical system that recapitulates key features of cellular NHEJ, we previously demonstrated that DNA ends are initially tethered at a distance, followed by Lig4-mediated formation of a “short-range synaptic complex” in which DNA ends are closely aligned for ligation7. Here, we show that a wide variety of end-processing activities all depend on formation of the short-range complex. Moreover, using real-time single molecule imaging, we find that end processing occurs within the short-range complex. Confining end processing to the Lig4-dependent short-range synaptic complex promotes immediate ligation of compatible ends and ensures that incompatible ends are ligated as soon as they become compatible, thereby minimizing end processing. Our results elucidate how NHEJ exploits end processing to achieve versatility while minimizing errors that cause genome instability.

scholarly journals Evolutionary and Comparative analysis of bacterial Non-Homologous End Joining Repair

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohak Sharda ◽  
Anjana Badrinarayanan ◽  
Aswin Sai Narain Seshasayee
Keyword(s):  
Growth Rates ◽  
Genome Stability ◽  
Ancestral Reconstruction ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
End Joining ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Domains Of Life ◽  
History Of ◽  
Non Homologous End Joining ◽  
Two Kingdoms

AbstractDNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) are a threat to genome stability. In all domains of life, DSBs are faithfully fixed via homologous recombination. Recombination requires the presence of an uncut copy of duplex DNA that is used as a template for repair. Alternatively, in the absence of a template, cells utilize error-prone Non-homologous end joining (NHEJ). Although ubiquitously found in eukaryotes, NHEJ is not universally present in bacteria. It is unclear as to why many prokaryotes lack this pathway. To understand what could have led to the current distribution of bacterial NHEJ, we carried out comparative genomics and phylogenetic analysis across ~6000 genomes. Our results show that this pathway is sporadically distributed across the phylogeny. Ancestral reconstruction further suggests that NHEJ was absent in the eubacterial ancestor, and can be acquired via specific routes. Integrating NHEJ occurrence data for archaea, we also find evidence for extensive horizontal exchange of NHEJ genes between the two kingdoms as well as across bacterial clades. The pattern of occurrence in bacteria is consistent with correlated evolution of NHEJ with key genome characteristics of genome size and growth rates; NHEJ presence is associated with large genome sizes and/or slow growth rates, with the former being the dominant correlate. Given the central role these traits play in determining the ability to carry out recombination, it is possible that the evolutionary history of bacterial NHEJ may have been shaped by requirement for efficient DSB repair.

scholarly journals Sir3 Heterochromatin Protein Promotes NHEJ by Direct Inhibition of Sae2

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hélène Bordelet ◽  
Rafaël Costa ◽  
Clémentine Brocas ◽  
Jordane DEPAGNE ◽  
Xavier Veaute ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Genome Stability ◽  
Gene Expression Regulation ◽  
Potent Inhibitor ◽  
Strand Break ◽  
End Joining ◽  
Direct Inhibition ◽  
Heterochromatin Protein ◽  
Repressive Chromatin ◽  
Non Homologous End Joining ◽  
Sir Complex

Heterochromatin is a conserved feature of eukaryotic chromosomes, with central roles in gene expression regulation and maintenance of genome stability. How DNA repair occurs in heterochromatin remains poorly described. In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, the Silent Information Regulator (SIR) complex assembles heterochromatin-like chromatin at subtelomeres. SIR-mediated repressive chromatin limits double strand break (DSB) resection protecting damaged chromosome ends during HR. As resection initiation marks the cross-road between repair by non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) or HR, we asked whether SIR-mediated heterochromatin regulates NHEJ. We show that SIRs promotes NHEJ through two pathways, one depending on repressive chromatin assembly, and the other relying on Sir3 in a manner that is independent of its heterochromatin-promoting function. Sir3 is a potent inhibitor of Sae2-dependent MRX functions. Sir3 physically interacts with Sae2 and this interaction impairs Sae2 interaction with MRX. As a consequence, Sir3 limits Mre11-mediated resection, delays MRX removal from DSB ends and promotes NHEJ.

scholarly journals Genome sequencing of evolved aspergilli populations reveals robust genomes, transversions in A. flavus, and sexual aberrancy in non-homologous end-joining mutants

BMC Biology ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Isidro Álvarez-Escribano ◽  
Christoph Sasse ◽  
Jin Woo Bok ◽  
Hyunsoo Na ◽  
Mojgan Amirebrahimi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Genome Sequencing ◽  
Mutation Rate ◽  
Genome Stability ◽  
Industrial Applications ◽  
Fungal Species ◽  
High Rate ◽  
Sexual Cycle ◽  
End Joining ◽  
In The Wild ◽  
Non Homologous End Joining

Abstract Background Aspergillus spp. comprises a very diverse group of lower eukaryotes with a high relevance for industrial applications and clinical implications. These multinucleate species are often cultured for many generations in the laboratory, which can unknowingly propagate hidden genetic mutations. To assess the likelihood of such events, we studied the genome stability of aspergilli by using a combination of mutation accumulation (MA) lines and whole genome sequencing. Results We sequenced the whole genomes of 30 asexual and 10 sexual MA lines of three Aspergillus species (A. flavus, A. fumigatus and A. nidulans) and estimated that each MA line accumulated mutations for over 4000 mitoses during asexual cycles. We estimated mutation rates of 4.2 × 10−11 (A. flavus), 1.1 × 10−11 (A. fumigatus) and 4.1 × 10−11 (A. nidulans) per site per mitosis, suggesting that the genomes are very robust. Unexpectedly, we found a very high rate of GC → TA transversions only in A. flavus. In parallel, 30 asexual lines of the non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ) mutants of the three species were also allowed to accumulate mutations for the same number of mitoses. Sequencing of these NHEJ MA lines gave an estimated mutation rate of 5.1 × 10−11 (A. flavus), 2.2 × 10−11 (A. fumigatus) and 4.5 × 10−11 (A. nidulans) per base per mitosis, which is slightly higher than in the wild-type strains and some ~ 5–6 times lower than in the yeasts. Additionally, in A. nidulans, we found a NHEJ-dependent interference of the sexual cycle that is independent of the accumulation of mutations. Conclusions We present for the first time direct counts of the mutation rate of filamentous fungal species and find that Aspergillus genomes are very robust. Deletion of the NHEJ machinery results in a slight increase in the mutation rate, but at a rate we suggest is still safe to use for biotechnology purposes. Unexpectedly, we found GC→TA transversions predominated only in the species A. flavus, which could be generated by the hepatocarcinogen secondary metabolite aflatoxin. Lastly, a strong effect of the NHEJ mutation in self-crossing was observed and an increase in the mutations of the asexual lines was quantified.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document