Dynamics of task allocation in social insect colonies: scaling effects of colony size versus work activities

2021 ◽  
Vol 82 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tao Feng ◽  
Daniel Charbonneau ◽  
Zhipeng Qiu ◽  
Yun Kang
2016 ◽  
Vol 70 (7) ◽  
pp. 1047-1061 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer H. Fewell ◽  
Jon F. Harrison

Author(s):  
James A. R Marshall ◽  
Rafal Bogacz ◽  
Anna Dornhaus ◽  
Robert Planqué ◽  
Tim Kovacs ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rui Chen ◽  
Bernd Meyer ◽  
Julian García

AbstractSocial insect colonies are capable of allocating their workforce in a decentralised fashion; addressing a variety of tasks and responding effectively to changes in the environment. This process is fundamental to their ecological success, but the mechanisms behind it remain poorly understood. While most models focus on internal and individual factors, empirical evidence highlights the importance of ecology and social interactions. To address this gap we propose a game theoretical model of task allocation. Individuals are characterised by a trait that determines how they split their energy between two prototypical tasks: foraging and regulation. To be viable, a colony needs to learn to adequately allocate its workforce between these two tasks. We study two different processes: individuals can learn relying exclusively on their own experience, or by using the experiences of others via social learning. We find that social organisation can be determined by the ecology alone, irrespective of interaction details. Weakly specialised colonies in which all individuals tend to both tasks emerge when foraging is cheap; harsher environments, on the other hand, lead to strongly specialised colonies in which each individual fully engages in a single task. We compare the outcomes of self-organised task allocation with optimal group performance. Counter to intuition, strongly specialised colonies perform suboptimally, whereas the group performance of weakly specialised colonies is closer to optimal. Social interactions lead to important differences when the colony deals with dynamic environments. Colonies whose individuals rely on their own experience are more exible when dealing with change. Our computational model is aligned with mathematical predictions in tractable limits. This different kind of model is useful in framing relevant and important empirical questions, where ecology and interactions are key elements of hypotheses and predictions.


2021 ◽  
Vol 81 (4) ◽  
pp. 1579-1599
Author(s):  
Tao Feng ◽  
Zhipeng Qiu ◽  
Yun Kang

2012 ◽  
Vol 2012 ◽  
pp. 1-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Teresa I. Schueller ◽  
Robert L. Jeanne

The ability of social insect colonies to recruit nestmates to profitable resources increases colony-wide foraging efficiency by providing individuals with information that narrows their search for resources. Here we ask if for the Neotropical swarm-founding waspPolybia occidentalisnaïve nestmates are able to use food-scent cues from rich carbohydrate resources brought to the nest by successful foragers to orient to off nest resources. Foragers were allowed to freely visit a training dish containing a scented sucrose solution. At a second location, in a different direction from the nest, two sucrose-filled dishes were offered, one with the training scent and one with an alternate scent. Naïve foragers preferentially chose the training scent over the alternate scent, indicating that natural rates of resource inflow to the nest are sufficient to induce nestmates to forage at resources with a specific scent. Naïve foragers did not forage more often at the location at which the active foragers were foraging, an indication that directional information is not communicated in this species. The total number of foraging trips made by a colony's foragers was not determined by the size of the foraging force, but rather by the average individual foraging rate for the colony.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document