Synovial membrane enhancement and bone erosion by magnetic resonance imaging for prediction of radiologic progression in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis

2003 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. 103-107 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nobuyuki Tanaka ◽  
Hisashi Sakahashi ◽  
Seiichi Ishii ◽  
Eiichi Sato ◽  
Kazuya Hirose ◽  
...  
2015 ◽  
Vol 42 (7) ◽  
pp. 1112-1118 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michaela Krohn ◽  
Sarah Ohrndorf ◽  
Stephanie G. Werner ◽  
Bernd Schicke ◽  
Gerd-Rüdiger Burmester ◽  
...  

Objective.Near-infrared fluorescence optical imaging (FOI) is a novel imaging technology in the detection and evaluation of different arthritides. FOI was validated in comparison to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), greyscale ultrasonography (GSUS), and power Doppler ultrasonography (PDUS) in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis (RA).Methods.Hands of 31 patients with early RA were examined by FOI, MRI, and US. In each modality, synovitis of the wrist, metacarpophalangeal joints (MCP) 2–5, and proximal interphalangeal joints (PIP) 2–5 were scored on a 4-point scale (0–3). Sensitivity and specificity of FOI were analyzed in comparison to MRI and US as reference methods, differentiating between 3 phases of FOI enhancement (P1–3). Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were calculated to evaluate the agreement of FOI with MRI and US.Results.A total of 279 joints (31 wrists, 124 MCP and 124 PIP joints) were evaluated. With MRI as the reference method, overall sensitivity/specificity of FOI was 0.81/0.00, 0.49/0.84, and 0.86/0.38 for wrist, MCP, and PIP joints, respectively. Under application of PDUS as reference, sensitivity was even higher, while specificity turned out to be low, except for MCP joints (0.88/0.15, 0.81/0.76, and 1.00/0.27, respectively). P2 appears to be the most sensitive FOI phase, while P1 showed the highest specificity. The best agreement of FOI was shown for PDUS, especially with regard to MCP and PIP joints (ICC of 0.57 and 0.53, respectively), while correlation with MRI was slightly lower.Conclusion.FOI remains an interesting diagnostic tool for patients with early RA, although this study revealed limitations concerning the detection of synovitis. Further research is needed to evaluate its full diagnostic potential in rheumatic diseases.


2018 ◽  
Vol 45 (7) ◽  
pp. 895-904 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ying-Qian Mo ◽  
Ze-Hong Yang ◽  
Hai-Ning He ◽  
Jian-Da Ma ◽  
Jin-Jian Liang ◽  
...  

Objective.To explore the advantages of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of bilateral hands in rheumatoid arthritis (RA).Methods.Consecutive patients with active RA were recruited for clinical assessments, radiographs, and MRI of bilateral hands. Bilateral hands were scanned simultaneously on 3.0 T whole-body MRI system and were scored on synovitis, osteitis, and bone erosion according to the RA MRI scoring (RAMRIS) system.Results.Among 120 patients included, wrist bones and metacarpophalangeal joint (MCPJ) 2 proximal showed bone erosion in early RA. The second to fifth metacarpal bases and the second to fourth MCPJ distal showed more bone erosion in mid-stage or late-stage RA. When MRI of dominant unilateral hand was analyzed, MRI synovitis and osteitis in 5% of wrists and 3 MRI features in 5–14% of MCPJ were misdiagnosed (McNemar test, all p < 0.05). There were 46% wrist synovitis, 29–52% MCPJ2–5 synovitis, 45% wrist osteitis, and 20%–34% MCPJ2–5 osteitis not detected by joint tenderness and/or swelling. When the clinically more severe hand was selected for MRI of unilateral hand according to physical examination, MRI synovitis in 5% of wrists and 3 MRI features in 7–15% of MCPJ were misdiagnosed (all p < 0.05). Scatter plots and linear regression analyses were used to illustrate RAMRIS between dominant or selected hand (Y values) and nondominant or nonselected hand (X values). All linear models were markedly different from a Y = X linear model, indicating the dominant or clinically more severe hand could not represent the contralateral hand to evaluate RAMRIS.Conclusion.MRI of bilateral hands is more optimal than MRI of the unilateral hand in RA.


2017 ◽  
Vol 44 (9) ◽  
pp. 1311-1324 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frances Humby ◽  
Arti Mahto ◽  
Muaaze Ahmed ◽  
Andrew Barr ◽  
Stephen Kelly ◽  
...  

Objective.Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has been increasingly recognized as a critical tool for the assessment of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and is able to reliably identify synovitis, bone marrow edema, bone erosion, and joint space narrowing (JSN)/cartilage loss. Understanding the exact relationship between each MRI feature and local synovial pathobiology is critical to dissect disease pathogenesis as well as develop future predictive models.Methods.A systematic review was performed of the current published literature examining the relationship between MRI abnormalities and synovial pathobiology in patients with RA.Results.Eighteen studies were identified; most focused on validation of MRI as a tool to detect and quantify synovitis, with a significant relationship demonstrated. Additionally, from the limited data available, a critical role seems likely for synovial pathways, at least in driving joint damage. However, there was a lack of data examining the relationship between synovial pathobiology and bone marrow abnormalities and JSN.Conclusion.Although understanding the interrelationship of these disease biomarkers offers the potential to enhance the predictive validity of modern imaging with concomitant synovial pathobiological analysis, further studies integrating MRI with synovial tissue analysis in well-controlled cohorts at distinct disease stages before and after therapeutic intervention are required to achieve this.


2018 ◽  
Vol 48 (4) ◽  
pp. 553-561 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marina Carotti ◽  
Fausto Salaffi ◽  
Marco Di Carlo ◽  
Francesco Sessa ◽  
Andrea Giovagnoni

2011 ◽  
Vol 38 (6) ◽  
pp. 1003-1008 ◽  
Author(s):  
HENRIËTTE BAAN ◽  
ROLAND BEZOOIJEN ◽  
JOHANNES K.A. AVENARIUS ◽  
ROSEMARY DUBBELDAM ◽  
WIEPKE K. DROSSAERS-BAKKER ◽  
...  

Objective.In rheumatology, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is predominantly applied in the assessment and outcome measurement of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in hands and wrists, leading to the development of the RAMRIS (RA-MRI-Scoring) system. It was initiated by the Outcome Measures in Rheumatoid Arthritis Clinical Trials (OMERACT). The RAMRIS system has not been applied widely in the measurement of feet. We investigated the interreader and intrareader agreement of the RAMRIS scoring system in the assessment of feet in RA.Methods.Twenty-nine patients with RA who had radiological damage and/or arthritis underwent MRI. Two experienced readers independently read both complete sets. One reader read 6 random sets after the initial session, in order to assess the intrareader agreement. For evaluation of the intrareader and interreader reliability, quadratic-weighted κ scores were calculated per joint and lesion.Results.For the forefeet, interreader scores were excellent, ranging from 0.77 (bone edema) to 0.95 (bone erosion). Hindfoot interreader agreement scores were highest for erosion (0.90) and synovitis global score (0.88), but edema and synovial thickness agreement were also acceptable (0.83 and 0.86). Intrareader scores were on the whole slightly lower, but excellent.Conclusion.Reliability (interreader and intrareader agreement) in the assessment of the rheumatoid foot according to the RAMRIS method is excellent.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document