Scientific papers presented at the European Congress of Radiology 2000: publication rates and characteristics during the period 2000–2004

2005 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 445-450 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alberto Miguel-Dasit ◽  
Luis Martí-Bonmatí ◽  
Pilar Sanfeliu ◽  
Rafael Aleixandre
2016 ◽  
Vol 41 (6) ◽  
pp. 694-699 ◽  
Author(s):  
A.S. Lau ◽  
M. Krishnan ◽  
S.P. Williams ◽  
C. Mamais ◽  
A. Sweed ◽  
...  

2006 ◽  
Vol 17 (5) ◽  
pp. 1372-1376 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alberto Miguel-Dasit ◽  
Luis Martí-Bonmatí ◽  
Antonio Sanfeliu-Montoro ◽  
Rafael Aleixandre ◽  
Juan Carlos Valderrama

2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 1215-1227
Author(s):  
Delphi GM Coppens ◽  
Helga Gardarsdottir ◽  
Cornelis A van den Bogert ◽  
Marie L De Bruin ◽  
Hubert GM Leufkens ◽  
...  

Aim: We investigated publication rates and reported results for gene- and cell-based therapy trials. Materials & methods: In a cohort of Institutional Review Board (IRB)-authorized trials during 2007–2017 in the Netherlands (n = 105), we examine publication rates and reported results in scientific papers and conference abstracts as well as associations with the occurrence of trial characteristics. Results: The publication rate for scientific papers was 27% and 17% for conference abstracts (median survival time: 1050 days). Academic hospitals published more in scientific papers whereas private sponsors published more in conference abstracts. Manufacturing protocols were underreported compared with clinical outcomes. Most publications reported positive results (78%). Conclusion: Publication rates are currently suboptimal indicating a need for enhanced knowledge sharing to stimulate gene- and cell-based therapy development.


2001 ◽  
Vol 26 (3) ◽  
pp. 253-256 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Roy ◽  
V. Sankar ◽  
J. P. Hughes ◽  
A. Jones ◽  
J. E. Fenton

Author(s):  
Marco Dollinger ◽  
Florian Zeman ◽  
René Müller-Wille ◽  
Lukas Beyer ◽  
Christian Stroszczynski ◽  
...  

Objectives To determine the rate at which original studies presented orally at the European Congress of Radiology (ECR) 2010 were published in Medline-indexed journals and to identify factors predictive of publication. Methods A total of 869 abstracts were included in the study. A Medline search of articles published between March 2010 and February 2015 was conducted to identify articles written by the first, second, and/or last authors of all abstracts published in the Scientific Program of ECR 2010. The publication year, journal, country of origin, subspecialty and nature of the research (i. e., human, animal or technical) were recorded. Results Between March 2010 and February 2015 a total of 450 abstracts (publication rate, 51.8 %) were subsequently published in 125 Medline-indexed journals, chiefly in European Radiology (11.1 %). 443/450 (98.4 %) articles were published in English language. The subspecialties of molecular imaging and cardiac imaging had the highest publication rates (75.0 % and 62.0 %, respectively), while computer application studies had the lowest (27.6 %). The nature of research, origin of the abstract and subspecialty significantly influenced the subsequent publication rate. Conclusion More than half of the original studies presented orally at ECR 2010 were subsequently published in Medline-indexed journals. More articles were published in the journal European Radiology than in any other identified journal. Key Points:  Citation Format


Marine Drugs ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 79 ◽  
Author(s):  
Judith Rumin ◽  
Elodie Nicolau ◽  
Raimundo Gonçalves de Oliveira Junior ◽  
Claudio Fuentes-Grünewald ◽  
Kevin J. Flynn ◽  
...  

A bibliographic database of scientific papers published by authors affiliated worldwide, especially focused in Europe and in the European Atlantic Area, and containing the keywords “microalga(e)” or “phytoplankton” was built. A corpus of 79,020 publications was obtained and analyzed using the Orbit Intellixir software to highlight the evolution of the research domain. Publication rates from 1960 to 2019, organization of the research, collaboration networks between countries and organizations, emerging and fading research concepts, major studied species, and associated concepts, as well as journals publishing microalgae research were considered. As a result, of the 79,020 papers published worldwide, 26,137 included authors from Europe (33% of world production) and 6989 from the European Atlantic Area (AA) (27% of European production, 9% of world production). The main worldwide scientific research topics found in this study were phytoplankton, community, bloom, diatoms, distribution, ecosystem, coastal, chlorophyll, zooplankton, photosynthesis, and primary production. At the European scale, the most studied topics were related to the environment, food, chemicals, pigments, protein, feed, and drugs. The highest scientific trends and market opportunities analysis identified bioplastics and biostimulants as top emerging concepts at the European level and agricultural, animal feed, and blue biotechnology at the European AA level.


2016 ◽  
Vol 7 (5) ◽  
pp. 755-762 ◽  
Author(s):  
Will Loughborough ◽  
Helen Dale ◽  
James H. Wareham ◽  
Adam H. Youssef ◽  
Mark A. Rodrigues ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 133 (06) ◽  
pp. 526-529 ◽  
Author(s):  
P Asimakopoulos ◽  
G Charalampidis ◽  
KM Chakravarthy ◽  
C Mamais

AbstractObjectiveThe ENT Scotland society (formerly known as the Scottish Otolaryngological Society) has two meetings a year and accepts oral presentations from trainees. This study aimed to identify publication rates from these meetings.MethodsAbstracts of the presentations are published in The Journal of Laryngology and Otology. A structured search on PubMed and Google Scholar was undertaken to identify which presentations from the 2005 to 2014 meetings have been published.ResultsOf the 145 abstracts found, 60.7 per cent were presenting clinical research and 44.1 per cent were related to the head and neck subspecialty. Seventy-three abstracts (50.3 per cent) were associated with publication as a peer-reviewed article; otology papers were more likely to be published than those focusing on other subspecialties (64.3 per cent, p = 0.036). No correlation was found between publication and other factors.ConclusionPresentations at the ENT Scotland meetings undergo unbiased peer review and are as likely to be published as those of other conferences.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document