scholarly journals Volume-based quantitative FDG PET/CT metrics and their association with optimal debulking and progression-free survival in patients with recurrent ovarian cancer undergoing secondary cytoreductive surgery

2015 ◽  
Vol 25 (11) ◽  
pp. 3348-3353 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. A. Vargas ◽  
I. A. Burger ◽  
D. A. Goldman ◽  
M. Miccò ◽  
R. E. Sosa ◽  
...  
2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alberto Zaniboni ◽  
Giordano Savelli ◽  
Claudio Pizzocaro ◽  
Pietro Basile ◽  
Valentina Massetti

The aim of the present paper is to review the scientific literature concerning the usefulness of18F-FDG PET/CT in the evaluation of response to chemotherapy in patients affected by liver metastases from colorectal cancer.Material and Methods. Studies were identified by searching PubMed electronic databases. Both prospective and retrospective studies were included. Information regarding the figure of merit of PET for the evaluation of therapy response was extracted and analyzed.Results. Existing data suggests that18F-FDG PET/CT may have an outstanding role in evaluating the response. The sensitivity of PET in detecting therapy response seems to be greater than conventional imaging (CT and MRI). PET/CT response is strictly related to better overall survival and progression-free survival.Conclusions. PET/CT is more than a promising technique to assess the response to chemotherapy in colorectal and liver metastases. However, to be fully validated, this examination needs further studies by recruiting more patients.


2009 ◽  
Vol 75 (3) ◽  
pp. S258-S259
Author(s):  
W.W. Lien ◽  
A.R. Rao ◽  
J.S. Kaptein ◽  
M.A. Tome

Oncology ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 75 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 152-158 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Fagotti ◽  
F. Fanfani ◽  
C. Rossitto ◽  
D. Lorusso ◽  
A.M. De Gaetano ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 20 ◽  
pp. 153303382110564
Author(s):  
Na Dai ◽  
Hang Liu ◽  
Shengming Deng ◽  
Shibiao Sang ◽  
Yiwei Wu

Purpose: In the present study, we mainly aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of 2-deoxy-2-[18F]fluoro-D-glucose ([18F]F-FDG) positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) after allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) in lymphoblastic lymphoma (LBL) patients using Deauville Scores (DS). Materials and Methods: A total of 63 LBL patients who benefited from 18F-FDG PET-CT after allo-SCT in our institution between April 2010 and August 2020 were enrolled in this retrospective study. These above-mentioned patients were divided into two groups based on the Deauville criteria. Diagnostic efficiency of 18F-FDG PET/CT and integrated CT in detecting lymphoma were calculated. Consistencies were evaluated by comparing 18F-FDG PET/CT and integrated CT results through kappa coefficient. Kaplan-Meier method was used in survival analysis, and the log-rank method was adopted in comparisons. Prognostic factor analysis was performed by the Cox regression model. Results: The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, accuracy of post-SCT 18F-FDG PET-CT were 100%(12/12), 92.2%(47/51), 75.0%(12/16), 100%(47/47) and 93.7%(59/63). The consistency of 18F-FDG PET-CT and integrated CT was moderate(Kappa = .702,P < .001). Positive post-SCT 18F-FDG PET-CT was associated with lower progression-free survival (PFS) but not overall survival (OS) (p = .000 and p = .056, respectively). The 3-year PFS of the PET-positive group and PET-negative group was 18.8% and 70.2%, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that post-SCT PET-CT findings was an independent prognostic factor for PFS (p = .000; HR, 3.957; 95%CI, 1.839-8.514). Other factors independently affecting PFS were sex (p = .018; HR, 2.588; 95% CI, 1.181 − 5.670) and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) (p = .005; HR, 3.246; 95% CI, 1.419 − 7.426). However, none of the above-mentioned factors were associated with OS. Conclusions: Collectively, we found that 18F-FDG PET-CT after allo-SCT was a strong indicator for PFS, but not OS, which might provide important evidence for the selection of subsequent treatment regimen for LBL patients. Trial registration number: ChiCTR2100046709.


2017 ◽  
Vol 26 (4) ◽  
pp. 347-351 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amnon Amit ◽  
Adina Hodes ◽  
Ofer Lavie ◽  
Zohar Keidar ◽  
Emad Matanes ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 110 (2) ◽  
pp. 152-157 ◽  
Author(s):  
David E. Cohn ◽  
Nathan C. Hall ◽  
Stephen P. Povoski ◽  
Leigh G. Seamon ◽  
William B. Farrar ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 129 ◽  
pp. 109076
Author(s):  
Dragana P. Sobic Saranovic ◽  
Marina Nikitovic ◽  
Jelena Saponjski ◽  
Isidora Grozdic Milojevic ◽  
Lejla Paripovic ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document