Comparison of contrast-enhanced CT, dual-layer detector spectral CT, and whole-body MRI in suspected metastatic breast cancer: a prospective diagnostic accuracy study

Author(s):  
Thomas Winther Buus ◽  
Finn Rasmussen ◽  
Hanne Marie Nellemann ◽  
Vibeke Løgager ◽  
Anders Bonde Jensen ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Vol 31 (1) ◽  
pp. 104-111
Author(s):  
Jeong Hee Yoon ◽  
Mi Hye Yu ◽  
Bo Yun Hur ◽  
Chang Min Park ◽  
Jeong Min Lee

2018 ◽  
Vol 48 (5) ◽  
pp. 638-647 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rodrigo Regacini ◽  
Andrea Puchnick ◽  
Flavio Augusto Vercillo Luisi ◽  
Henrique Manoel Lederman

2017 ◽  
Vol 44 (9) ◽  
pp. 1428-1437 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher C. Riedl ◽  
Katja Pinker ◽  
Gary A. Ulaner ◽  
Leonard T. Ong ◽  
Pascal Baltzer ◽  
...  

Diagnostics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (6) ◽  
pp. 1007
Author(s):  
Domenico Albano ◽  
Giuseppe Micci ◽  
Caterina Patti ◽  
Federico Midiri ◽  
Silvia Albano ◽  
...  

Imaging of lymphoma is based on the use of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (18F-FDG-PET/CT) and/or contrast-enhanced CT, but concerns have been raised regarding radiation exposure related to imaging scans in patients with cancer, and its association with increased risk of secondary tumors in patients with lymphoma has been established. To date, lymphoproliferative disorders are among the most common indications to perform whole-body magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Whole-body MRI is superior to contrast-enhanced CT for staging the disease, also being less dependent on histology if compared to 18F-FDG-PET/CT. As well, it does not require exposure to ionizing radiation and could be used for the surveillance of lymphoma. The current role of whole-body MRI in the diagnostic workup in lymphoma is examined in the present review along with the diagnostic performance in staging, response assessment and surveillance of different lymphoma subtypes.


2018 ◽  
Vol 50 (01) ◽  
pp. 17-20
Author(s):  
Trine Jørgensen

Riedl CC, Pinker K, Ulaner GA, Ong LT, Baltzer P, Jochelson MS, McArthur HL, Gönen M, Dickler M, Weber WA. Comparison of FDG-PET/CT and contrast-enhanced CT for monitoring therapy response in patients with metastatic breast cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2017; doi: 10.1007/s00259-017-3703-7 Eine PET/CT-Untersuchung kann den Erfolg einer Brustkrebstherapie besser vorhersagen als eine Computertomographie (CT) allein. Dies belegt eine neue Studie mit 145 Patientinnen, die an fortgeschrittenem Brustkrebs litten. Demnach könnte das nuklearmedizinisch-radiologische Kombi-Verfahren den Therapieverlauf bei jeder vierten Brustkrebspatientin beeinflussen.


2009 ◽  
Vol 62 (6) ◽  
pp. 1423-1430 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kai H. Barck ◽  
Brandon Willis ◽  
Jed Ross ◽  
Dorothy M. French ◽  
Ellen H. Filvaroff ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 181 (2) ◽  
pp. 383-390 ◽  
Author(s):  
Heather A. Jacene ◽  
Pamela J. DiPiro ◽  
Jennifer Bellon ◽  
Jiani Hu ◽  
Su-Chun Cheng ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 29 (3) ◽  
pp. 1221-1230 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eva Dyrberg ◽  
Helle W. Hendel ◽  
Tri Hien Viet Huynh ◽  
Tobias Wirenfeldt Klausen ◽  
Vibeke B. Løgager ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document