Learning curves in laparoscopic and robot-assisted prostate surgery: a systematic search and review

Author(s):  
Nikolaos Grivas ◽  
Ioannis Zachos ◽  
Georgios Georgiadis ◽  
Markos Karavitakis ◽  
Vasilis Tzortzis ◽  
...  
BJS Open ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 27-44 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. A. Soomro ◽  
D. A. Hashimoto ◽  
A. J. Porteous ◽  
C. J. A. Ridley ◽  
W. J. Marsh ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 22 ◽  
pp. S371-S372
Author(s):  
R. Ditto ◽  
D. Nagle ◽  
C. Ridley ◽  
A. Porteous ◽  
W. Marsh ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 33 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
B Feike Kingma ◽  
Edin Hadzijusufovic ◽  
Pieter C Van der Sluis ◽  
Erida Bano ◽  
Hauke Lang ◽  
...  

ABSTRACT To ensure safe implementation of robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE), the learning process should be optimized. This study aimed to report the results of a surgeon who implemented RAMIE in a German high-volume center by following a tailored and structured training pathway that involved proctoring. Consecutive patients who underwent RAMIE during the course of the program were included from a prospective database. A single surgeon, who had prior experience in conventional MIE, performed all RAMIE procedures. Cumulative sum (CUSUM) learning curves were plotted for the thoracic operating time and intraoperative blood loss. Perioperative outcomes were compared between patients who underwent surgery before and after a learning curve plateau occurred. Between 2017 and 2018, the adopting center adhered to the structured training pathway, and a total of 70 patients were included in the analysis. The CUSUM learning curves showed plateaus after 22 cases. In consecutive cases 23 to 70, the operating time was shorter for both the thoracic phase (median 215 vs. 249 minutes, P = 0.001) and overall procedure (median 394 vs. 440 minutes, P = 0.005), intraoperative blood loss was less (median 210 vs. 400 milliliters, P = 0.029), and lymph node yield was higher (median 32 vs. 23 nodes, P = 0.001) when compared to cases 1 to 22. No significant differences were found in terms of conversion rates, postoperative complications, length of stay, completeness of resection, or mortality. In conclusion, the structured training pathway resulted in a short and safe learning curve for RAMIE in this single center’s experience. As the pathway seems effective in implementing RAMIE without compromising the early oncological outcomes and complication rates, it is advised for surgeons who are wanting to adopt this technique.


2022 ◽  
Vol 97 ◽  
pp. 42-48
Author(s):  
Nikhil Vasan ◽  
Daniel B. Scherman ◽  
Andrew Kam

2016 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
pp. e664
Author(s):  
M. Okano ◽  
R. Ivanovic ◽  
Q.S.S. Nomelini ◽  
H. Morais ◽  
J. Pontes ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 34 (8) ◽  
pp. 3679-3689 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erik Leijte ◽  
Ivo de Blaauw ◽  
Frans Van Workum ◽  
Camiel Rosman ◽  
Sanne Botden

Abstract Background Compared to conventional laparoscopy, robot assisted surgery is expected to have most potential in difficult areas and demanding technical skills like minimally invasive suturing. This study was performed to identify the differences in the learning curves of laparoscopic versus robot assisted suturing. Method Novice participants performed three suturing tasks on the EoSim laparoscopic augmented reality simulator or the RobotiX robot assisted virtual reality simulator. Each participant performed an intracorporeal suturing task, a tilted plane needle transfer task and an anastomosis needle transfer task. To complete the learning curve, all tasks were repeated up to twenty repetitions or until a time plateau was reached. Clinically relevant and comparable parameters regarding time, movements and safety were recorded. Intracorporeal suturing time and cumulative sum analysis was used to compare the learning curves and phases. Results Seventeen participants completed the learning curve laparoscopically and 30 robot assisted. Median first knot suturing time was 611 s (s) for laparoscopic versus 251 s for robot assisted (p < 0.001), and this was 324 s versus 165 (sixth knot, p < 0.001) and 257 s and 149 s (eleventh knot, p < 0.001) respectively on base of the found learning phases. The percentage of ‘adequate surgical knots’ was higher in the laparoscopic than in the robot assisted group. First knot: 71% versus 60%, sixth knot: 100% versus 83%, and eleventh knot: 100% versus 73%. When assessing the ‘instrument out of view’ parameter, the robot assisted group scored a median of 0% after repetition four. In the laparoscopic group, the instrument out of view increased from 3.1 to 3.9% (left) and from 3.0 to 4.1% (right) between the first and eleventh knot (p > 0.05). Conclusion The learning curve of minimally invasive suturing shows a shorter task time curve using robotic assistance compared to the laparoscopic curve. However, laparoscopic outcomes show good end results with rapid outcome improvement.


2007 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 171-174 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeroen Heemskerk ◽  
Wim G. van Gemert ◽  
Jolanda de Vries ◽  
JanWillem Greve ◽  
Nicole D. Bouvy

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document