Behaviour of the energy dissipation coefficient in a rough wall turbulent boundary layer

2017 ◽  
Vol 59 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Md. Kamruzzaman ◽  
L. Djenidi ◽  
R. A. Antonia
1998 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 280-282
Author(s):  
Petras Baradokas

The paper discusses the problem of evaluating vibration energy dissipation of a composite material. It is suggested to express the dissipation cofficient in a line (2). The reduced component dissipation coefficients c i φi are the members of the line. The ratio of reduction c i , shows the proportion by which a separate component adds to the energy dissipation of the entire composition. By analysing the accumulated and dissipated strain energy of a composite material were obtained (6). On the basis of these expressions, formulas for calculating the dissipation coefficients of a three-layer bar and that with a galvanic covering were devised. The analysis made leads to the following conclusions: - the vibration energy dissipation coefficient of a composite material is equal to the sum of the reduced dissipation coefficients of the composition component materials; - the ratio of reduction c i depends on the value of the component accumulated energy; - for comparing separate components as to the energy dissipation, the product φ i E i should be used.


2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (8) ◽  
pp. 589
Author(s):  
Mohamad Alkhalidi ◽  
Noor Alanjari ◽  
S. Neelamani

The interaction between waves and slotted vertical walls was experimentally studied in this research to examine the performance of the structure in terms of wave transmission, reflection, and energy dissipation. Single and twin slotted barriers of different slopes and porosities were tested under random wave conditions. A parametric analysis was performed to understand the effect of wall porosity and slope, the number of walls, and the incoming relative wave height and period on the structure performance. The main focus of the study was on wave transmission, which is the main parameter required for coastal engineering applications. The results show that reducing wall porosity from 30% to 10% decreases the wave transmission by a maximum of 35.38% and 38.86% for single and twin walls, respectively, increases the wave reflection up to 47.6%, and increases the energy dissipation by up to 23.7% on average for single walls. For twin-walls, the reduction in wall porosity decreases the wave transmission up to 26.3%, increases the wave reflection up to 40.5%, and the energy dissipation by 13.3%. The addition of a second wall is more efficient in reducing the transmission coefficient than the other wall parameters. The reflection and the energy dissipation coefficients are more affected by the wall porosity than the wall slope or the existence of a second wall. The results show that as the relative wave height increases from 0.1284 to 0.2593, the transmission coefficient decreases by 21.2%, the reflection coefficient decreases by 15.5%, and the energy dissipation coefficient increases by 18.4% on average. Both the transmission and the reflection coefficients increase as the relative wave length increases while the energy dissipation coefficient decreases. The variation in the three coefficients is more significant in deep water than in shallower water.


2007 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 196-204
Author(s):  
Takatsugu KAMEDA ◽  
Kazuto KOREISHI ◽  
Shinsuke MOCHIZUKI ◽  
Hideo OSAKA

1997 ◽  
Vol 342 ◽  
pp. 263-293 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. S. SHAFI ◽  
R. A. ANTONIA

Measurements of the spanwise and wall-normal components of vorticity and their constituent velocity derivative fluctuations have been made in a turbulent boundary layer over a mesh-screen rough wall using a four-hot-wire vorticity probe. The measured spectra and variances of vorticity and velocity derivatives have been corrected for the effect of spatial resolution. The high-wavenumber behaviour of the spectra conforms closely with isotropy. Over most of the outer layer, the normalized magnitudes of the velocity derivative variances differ significantly from those over a smooth wall layer. The differences are such that the variances are much more nearly isotropic over the rough wall than on the smooth wall. This behaviour is consistent with earlier observations that the large-scale structure in this rough wall layer is more isotropic than that in a smooth wall layer. Isotropy-based approximations for the mean energy dissipation rate and mean enstrophy are consequently more reliable in this rough wall layer than in a smooth wall layer. In the outer layer, the vorticity variances are slightly larger than those over a smooth wall; reflecting structural differences between the two flows.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document