Using analysis state to construct a forecast error covariance matrix in ensemble Kalman filter assimilation

2013 ◽  
Vol 30 (5) ◽  
pp. 1303-1312 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaogu Zheng ◽  
Guocan Wu ◽  
Shupeng Zhang ◽  
Xiao Liang ◽  
Yongjiu Dai ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Kalman Filter ◽  
Covariance Matrix ◽  
Ensemble Kalman Filter ◽  
Forecast Error ◽  
Error Covariance Matrix ◽  
Error Covariance

scholarly journals An estimate of the inflation factor and analysis sensitivity in the ensemble Kalman filter

2017 ◽  
Vol 24 (3) ◽  
pp. 329-341 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guocan Wu ◽  
Xiaogu Zheng
Keyword(s):  
Kalman Filter ◽  
Covariance Matrix ◽  
Ensemble Kalman Filter ◽  
Forecast Error ◽  
Model Errors ◽  
Error Covariance Matrix ◽  
Spatially Correlated ◽  
Error Covariance ◽  
Inflation Factor ◽  
Analysis Error

Abstract. The ensemble Kalman filter (EnKF) is a widely used ensemble-based assimilation method, which estimates the forecast error covariance matrix using a Monte Carlo approach that involves an ensemble of short-term forecasts. While the accuracy of the forecast error covariance matrix is crucial for achieving accurate forecasts, the estimate given by the EnKF needs to be improved using inflation techniques. Otherwise, the sampling covariance matrix of perturbed forecast states will underestimate the true forecast error covariance matrix because of the limited ensemble size and large model errors, which may eventually result in the divergence of the filter. In this study, the forecast error covariance inflation factor is estimated using a generalized cross-validation technique. The improved EnKF assimilation scheme is tested on the atmosphere-like Lorenz-96 model with spatially correlated observations, and is shown to reduce the analysis error and increase its sensitivity to the observations.

scholarly journals Efficient Adaptive Error Parameterizations for Square Root or Ensemble Kalman Filters: Application to the Control of Ocean Mesoscale Signals

2010 ◽  
Vol 138 (3) ◽  
pp. 932-950 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jean-Michel Brankart ◽  
Emmanuel Cosme ◽  
Charles-Emmanuel Testut ◽  
Pierre Brasseur ◽  
Jacques Verron
Keyword(s):  
Kalman Filter ◽  
Covariance Matrix ◽  
Error Estimates ◽  
Forecast Error ◽  
Observation Error ◽  
Square Root ◽  
Error Statistics ◽  
Error Covariance Matrix ◽  
Error Covariance ◽  
Optimal Estimates

Abstract In Kalman filter applications, an adaptive parameterization of the error statistics is often necessary to avoid filter divergence, and prevent error estimates from becoming grossly inconsistent with the real error. With the classic formulation of the Kalman filter observational update, optimal estimates of general adaptive parameters can only be obtained at a numerical cost that is several times larger than the cost of the state observational update. In this paper, it is shown that there exists a few types of important parameters for which optimal estimates can be computed at a negligible numerical cost, as soon as the computation is performed using a transformed algorithm that works in the reduced control space defined by the square root or ensemble representation of the forecast error covariance matrix. The set of parameters that can be efficiently controlled includes scaling factors for the forecast error covariance matrix, scaling factors for the observation error covariance matrix, or even a scaling factor for the observation error correlation length scale. As an application, the resulting adaptive filter is used to estimate the time evolution of ocean mesoscale signals using observations of the ocean dynamic topography. To check the behavior of the adaptive mechanism, this is done in the context of idealized experiments, in which model error and observation error statistics are known. This ideal framework is particularly appropriate to explore the ill-conditioned situations (inadequate prior assumptions or uncontrollability of the parameters) in which adaptivity can be misleading. Overall, the experiments show that, if used correctly, the efficient optimal adaptive algorithm proposed in this paper introduces useful supplementary degrees of freedom in the estimation problem, and that the direct control of these statistical parameters by the observations increases the robustness of the error estimates and thus the optimality of the resulting Kalman filter.

scholarly journals Assimilation of Stratospheric Temperature and Ozone with an Ensemble Kalman Filter in a Chemistry–Climate Model

2011 ◽  
Vol 139 (11) ◽  
pp. 3389-3404 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas Milewski ◽  
Michel S. Bourqui
Keyword(s):  
Kalman Filter ◽  
Data Assimilation ◽  
Covariance Matrix ◽  
Ensemble Kalman Filter ◽  
Climate Model ◽  
Observation Error ◽  
Background Error ◽  
Error Covariance Matrix ◽  
Error Covariance ◽  
Analysis Error

Abstract A new stratospheric chemical–dynamical data assimilation system was developed, based upon an ensemble Kalman filter coupled with a Chemistry–Climate Model [i.e., the intermediate-complexity general circulation model Fast Stratospheric Ozone Chemistry (IGCM-FASTOC)], with the aim to explore the potential of chemical–dynamical coupling in stratospheric data assimilation. The system is introduced here in a context of a perfect-model, Observing System Simulation Experiment. The system is found to be sensitive to localization parameters, and in the case of temperature (ozone), assimilation yields its best performance with horizontal and vertical decorrelation lengths of 14 000 km (5600 km) and 70 km (14 km). With these localization parameters, the observation space background-error covariance matrix is underinflated by only 5.9% (overinflated by 2.1%) and the observation-error covariance matrix by only 1.6% (0.5%), which makes artificial inflation unnecessary. Using optimal localization parameters, the skills of the system in constraining the ensemble-average analysis error with respect to the true state is tested when assimilating synthetic Michelson Interferometer for Passive Atmospheric Sounding (MIPAS) retrievals of temperature alone and ozone alone. It is found that in most cases background-error covariances produced from ensemble statistics are able to usefully propagate information from the observed variable to other ones. Chemical–dynamical covariances, and in particular ozone–wind covariances, are essential in constraining the dynamical fields when assimilating ozone only, as the radiation in the stratosphere is too slow to transfer ozone analysis increments to the temperature field over the 24-h forecast window. Conversely, when assimilating temperature, the chemical–dynamical covariances are also found to help constrain the ozone field, though to a much lower extent. The uncertainty in forecast/analysis, as defined by the variability in the ensemble, is large compared to the analysis error, which likely indicates some amount of noise in the covariance terms, while also reducing the risk of filter divergence.

scholarly journals Data assimilation with multiple types of observation boreholes via the ensemble Kalman filter embedded within stochastic moment equations

2021 ◽  
Vol 25 (4) ◽  
pp. 1689-1709
Author(s):  
Chuan-An Xia ◽  
Xiaodong Luo ◽  
Bill X. Hu ◽  
Monica Riva ◽  
Alberto Guadagnini
Keyword(s):  
Kalman Filter ◽  
Covariance Matrix ◽  
Ensemble Kalman Filter ◽  
Type A ◽  
Observation Error ◽  
Type B ◽  
Moment Equations ◽  
Error Covariance Matrix ◽  
Monitoring Wells ◽  
Error Covariance

Abstract. We employ an approach based on the ensemble Kalman filter coupled with stochastic moment equations (MEs-EnKF) of groundwater flow to explore the dependence of conductivity estimates on the type of available information about hydraulic heads in a three-dimensional randomly heterogeneous field where convergent flow driven by a pumping well takes place. To this end, we consider three types of observation devices corresponding to (i) multi-node monitoring wells equipped with packers (Type A) and (ii) partially (Type B) and (iii) fully (Type C) screened wells. We ground our analysis on a variety of synthetic test cases associated with various configurations of these observation wells. Moment equations are approximated at second order (in terms of the standard deviation of the natural logarithm, Y, of conductivity) and are solved by an efficient transient numerical scheme proposed in this study. The use of an inflation factor imposed to the observation error covariance matrix is also analyzed to assess the extent at which this can strengthen the ability of the MEs-EnKF to yield appropriate conductivity estimates in the presence of a simplified modeling strategy where flux exchanges between monitoring wells and aquifer are neglected. Our results show that (i) the configuration associated with Type A monitoring wells leads to conductivity estimates with the (overall) best quality, (ii) conductivity estimates anchored on information from Type B and C wells are of similar quality, (iii) inflation of the measurement-error covariance matrix can improve conductivity estimates when a simplified flow model is adopted, and (iv) when compared with the standard Monte Carlo-based EnKF method, the MEs-EnKF can efficiently and accurately estimate conductivity and head fields.

scholarly journals Data assimilation with multiple types of observation boreholes via ensemble Kalman filter embedded within stochastic moment equations

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chuan-An Xia ◽  
Xiaodong Luo ◽  
Bill X. Hu ◽  
Monica Riva ◽  
Alberto Guadagnini
Keyword(s):  
Kalman Filter ◽  
Covariance Matrix ◽  
Ensemble Kalman Filter ◽  
Type A ◽  
Observation Error ◽  
Type B ◽  
Moment Equations ◽  
Error Covariance Matrix ◽  
Monitoring Wells ◽  
Error Covariance

Abstract. We employ an approach based on ensemble Kalman filter coupled with stochastic moment equations (MEs-EnKF) of groundwater flow to explore the dependence of conductivity estimates on the type of available information about hydraulic heads in a three-dimensional randomly heterogeneous field where convergent flow driven by a pumping well takes place. To this end, we consider three types of observation devices, corresponding to (i) multi-node monitoring wells equipped with packers (Type A), (ii) partially (Type B) and (iii) fully (Type C) screened wells. We ground our analysis on a variety of synthetic test cases associated with various configurations of these observation wells. Moment equations are approximated at second order (in terms of the standard deviation of the natural logarithm, Y, of conductivity) and are solved by an efficient transient numerical scheme proposed in this study. The use of an inflation factor imposed to the observation error covariance matrix is also analyzed to assess the extent at which this can strengthen the ability of the MEs-EnKF to yield appropriate conductivity estimates in the presence of a simplified modeling strategy where flux exchanges between monitoring wells and aquifer are neglected. Our results show that (i) the configuration associated with Type A monitoring wells leads to conductivity estimates with the (overall) best quality; (ii) conductivity estimates anchored on information from Type B and C wells are of similar quality; (iii) inflation of the measurement-error covariance matrix can improve conductivity estimates when an incomplete/simplified flow model is adopted; and (iv) when compared with the standard Monte Carlo -based EnKF method, the MEs-EnKF can efficiently and accurately estimate conductivity and head fields.

scholarly journals On Domain Localization in Ensemble-Based Kalman Filter Algorithms

2011 ◽  
Vol 139 (7) ◽  
pp. 2046-2060 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tijana Janjić ◽  
Lars Nerger ◽  
Alberta Albertella ◽  
Jens Schröter ◽  
Sergey Skachko
Keyword(s):  
Kalman Filter ◽  
Covariance Matrix ◽  
Ocean Circulation ◽  
Forecast Error ◽  
Circulation Model ◽  
Error Covariance Matrix ◽  
Error Covariance ◽  
Error Localization ◽  
Filter Methods ◽  
Filter Algorithms

Abstract Ensemble Kalman filter methods are typically used in combination with one of two localization techniques. One technique is covariance localization, or direct forecast error localization, in which the ensemble-derived forecast error covariance matrix is Schur multiplied with a chosen correlation matrix. The second way of localization is by domain decomposition. Here, the assimilation is split into local domains in which the assimilation update is performed independently. Domain localization is frequently used in combination with filter algorithms that use the analysis error covariance matrix for the calculation of the gain like the ensemble transform Kalman filter (ETKF) and the singular evolutive interpolated Kalman filter (SEIK). However, since the local assimilations are performed independently, smoothness of the analysis fields across the subdomain boundaries becomes an issue of concern. To address the problem of smoothness, an algorithm is introduced that uses domain localization in combination with a Schur product localization of the forecast error covariance matrix for each local subdomain. On a simple example, using the Lorenz-40 system, it is demonstrated that this modification can produce results comparable to those obtained with direct forecast error localization. In addition, these results are compared to the method that uses domain localization in combination with weighting of observations. In the simple example, the method using weighting of observations is less accurate than the new method, particularly if the observation errors are small. Domain localization with weighting of observations is further examined in the case of assimilation of satellite data into the global finite-element ocean circulation model (FEOM) using the local SEIK filter. In this example, the use of observational weighting improves the accuracy of the analysis. In addition, depending on the correlation function used for weighting, the spectral properties of the solution can be improved.

scholarly journals Sampling Errors in Ensemble Kalman Filtering. Part I: Theory

2008 ◽  
Vol 136 (8) ◽  
pp. 3035-3049 ◽  
Author(s):  
William Sacher ◽  
Peter Bartello
Keyword(s):  
Kalman Filter ◽  
Covariance Matrix ◽  
Ensemble Kalman Filter ◽  
Test Case ◽  
Sampling Errors ◽  
Background Error ◽  
Theoretical Understanding ◽  
Error Covariance Matrix ◽  
Error Covariance ◽  
Filter Divergence

Abstract This paper discusses the quality of the analysis given by the ensemble Kalman filter in a perfect model context when ensemble sizes are limited. The overall goal is to improve the theoretical understanding of the problem of systematic errors in the analysis variance due to the limited size of the ensemble, as well as the potential of the so-called double-ensemble Kalman filter, covariance inflation, and randomly perturbed analysis techniques to produce a stable analysis—that is to say, one not subject to filter divergence. This is achieved by expressing the error of the ensemble mean and the analysis error covariance matrix in terms of the sampling noise in the background error covariance matrix (owing to the finite ensemble estimation) and by comparing these errors for all methods. Theoretical predictions are confirmed with a simple scalar test case. In light of the analytical results obtained, the expression of the optimal covariance inflation factor is proposed in terms of the limited ensemble size and the Kalman gain.

scholarly journals Balance and Ensemble Kalman Filter Localization Techniques

2011 ◽  
Vol 139 (2) ◽  
pp. 511-522 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven J. Greybush ◽  
Eugenia Kalnay ◽  
Takemasa Miyoshi ◽  
Kayo Ide ◽  
Brian R. Hunt
Keyword(s):  
Kalman Filter ◽  
Data Assimilation ◽  
Covariance Matrix ◽  
Ensemble Kalman Filter ◽  
Weather Prediction ◽  
Length Scale ◽  
Observation Error ◽  
Long Distance ◽  
Error Covariance Matrix ◽  
Error Covariance

Abstract In ensemble Kalman filter (EnKF) data assimilation, localization modifies the error covariance matrices to suppress the influence of distant observations, removing spurious long-distance correlations. In addition to allowing efficient parallel implementation, this takes advantage of the atmosphere’s lower dimensionality in local regions. There are two primary methods for localization. In B localization, the background error covariance matrix elements are reduced by a Schur product so that correlations between grid points that are far apart are removed. In R localization, the observation error covariance matrix is multiplied by a distance-dependent function, so that far away observations are considered to have infinite error. Successful numerical weather prediction depends upon well-balanced initial conditions to avoid spurious propagation of inertial-gravity waves. Previous studies note that B localization can disrupt the relationship between the height gradient and the wind speed of the analysis increments, resulting in an analysis that can be significantly ageostrophic. This study begins with a comparison of the accuracy and geostrophic balance of EnKF analyses using no localization, B localization, and R localization with simple one-dimensional balanced waves derived from the shallow-water equations, indicating that the optimal length scale for R localization is shorter than for B localization, and that for the same length scale R localization is more balanced. The comparison of localization techniques is then expanded to the Simplified Parameterizations, Primitive Equation Dynamics (SPEEDY) global atmospheric model. Here, natural imbalance of the slow manifold must be contrasted with undesired imbalance introduced by data assimilation. Performance of the two techniques is comparable, also with a shorter optimal localization distance for R localization than for B localization.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document