The effect of preoperative aspirin administration on postoperative level of von Willebrand factor in off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery

2009 ◽  
Vol 24 (3) ◽  
pp. 169-174 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kaoru Matsuura ◽  
Mizuho Imamaki ◽  
Atsushi Ishida ◽  
Hitoshi Shimura ◽  
Masaru Miyazaki
2005 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 89 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kevin M. Harris ◽  
Avinash Reddy ◽  
Dorothee Aepplii ◽  
Betsy Wilson ◽  
Robert W. Emery

Background: Patients undergoing on-pump coronary artery bypass surgery (CAB) with coexistent moderate ischemic mitral regurgitation (IMR) have a significant mortality rate compared to patients without MR. The mortality rate is elevated both perioperatively (0%-12% mortality), as well as over a 1- and 2-year postoperative period (15%-25%). It is thought that some patients are best served by off-pump CAB (OPCAB); however, outcomes have not been reported for such patients with coexistent moderate IMR. Methods: We reviewed the independent database of patients undergoing OPCAB between 1995 and 2002 to find 989 patients, 17 (1.7%) of whom had moderate or moderately severe MR. Patients were contacted and clinical and echocardiographic data were obtained. Results: The patient group consisted of 11 men and 6 women (age, 65 15 years). The study group had a PA pressure of 52 14, creatinine of 1.6 0.7, and left ventricular ejection fraction of 43 18. Nine patients (53%) had advanced New York Heart Association (class III-IV) heart failure. Mortality rates perioperatively and at 1, 2, and 3 years were 0%, 6.25% (1/16), 12.5% (2/16), and 38% (4/8), respectively. At the time of this report, no patient had returned for a reparative procedure. Conclusion: In patients felt to be best served by OPCAB with ischemic MR, operative and intermediate mortality rates are remarkably similar to those previously reported for on-pump series. These data underscore the continued need to understand which patients undergoing CAB require mitral valve problems to be addressed at the time of surgery.


2021 ◽  
pp. 021849232110195
Author(s):  
Vasileios Ntinopoulos ◽  
Nestoras Papadopoulos ◽  
Achim Haeussler ◽  
Dragan Odavic ◽  
Patricia Fodor ◽  
...  

Background Even though the physiological derangements caused by hypothermia are well described, there is no consensus about its impact on postoperative outcomes. The aim of this study is to assess the effect of postoperative hypothermia on outcomes after off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery. Methods A total of 1979 patients undergoing isolated off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery in a single center in the period 2007–2018 were classified according to their axillary temperature measurement at intensive care unit admission postoperatively to either hypothermic (<36°C) or normothermic (≥36°C). Between-group differences on baseline characteristics and postoperative outcomes were assessed before and after propensity score matching. Results Data analysis showed that 582 patients (29.4%) were hypothermic (median temperature 35.5°C) and 1397 patients (70.6%) were normothermic (median temperature 36.4°C). Using propensity score matching, 567 patient pairs were created. Patients with hypothermia exhibited a higher rate of postoperative transfusion of at least three red cell concentrate units (14.3% vs 9%, p = 0.005), a longer intubation duration (median duration, 6 vs 5 h, p < 0.0001), and a longer intensive care unit stay (median stay, 1.6 vs 1.3 days, p = 0.008). There was no difference in reoperation for bleeding, renal replacement therapy, infections, and mortality between the two groups. Conclusions Even though associated with a higher blood transfusion requirement and a slightly longer intensive care unit stay, mild postoperative hypothermia was not associated with a higher morbidity and mortality.


Author(s):  
Laura Anneli Ylikauma ◽  
Pasi Petteri Ohtonen ◽  
Tiina Maria Erkinaro ◽  
Merja Annika Vakkala ◽  
Janne Henrik Liisanantti ◽  
...  

AbstractThe pulmonary artery catheter (PAC) is considered the gold standard for cardiac index monitoring. Recently new and less invasive methods to assess cardiac performance have been developed. The aim of our study was to assess the reliability of a non-invasive monitor utilizing bioreactance (Starling SV) and a non-calibrated mini-invasive pulse contour device (FloTrac/EV1000, fourth-generation software) compared to bolus thermodilution technique with PAC (TDCO) during off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery (OPCAB). In this prospective study, 579 simultaneous intra- and postoperative cardiac index measurements obtained with Starling SV, FloTrac/EV1000 and TDCO were compared in 20 patients undergoing OPCAB. The agreement of data was investigated by Bland–Altman plots, while trending ability was assessed by four-quadrant plots with error grids. In comparison with TDCO, Starling SV was associated with a bias of 0.13 L min−1 m−2 (95% confidence interval, 95% CI, 0.07 to 0.18), wide limits of agreement (LOA, − 1.23 to 1.51 L min−1 m−2), a percentage error (PE) of 60.7%, and poor trending ability. In comparison with TDCO, FloTrac was associated with a bias of 0.01 L min−1 m−2 (95% CI − 0.05 to 0.06), wide LOA (− 1.27 to 1.29 L min−1 m−2), a PE of 56.8% and poor trending ability. Both Starling SV and fourth-generation FloTrac showed acceptable mean bias but imprecision due to wide LOA and high PE, and poor trending ability. These findings indicate limited reliability in monitoring cardiac index in patients undergoing OPCAB.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document