Inter-rater agreement in pPOSSUM scores of geriatric trauma patients: a prospective evaluation

Author(s):  
Jip Q. Kusen ◽  
Frank J. P. Beeres ◽  
Puck C. R. van der Vet ◽  
Beate Poblete ◽  
Steffen Geuss ◽  
...  
Surgery ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 166 (3) ◽  
pp. 403-407 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chelsey Santino ◽  
Muhammad Zeeshan ◽  
Mohammad Hamidi ◽  
Kamil Hanna ◽  
Abdul Tawab Saljuqi ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 87 (5) ◽  
pp. 1172-1180 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammad Hamidi ◽  
Zaid Haddadin ◽  
Muhammad Zeeshan ◽  
Abdul Tawab Saljuqi ◽  
Kamil Hanna ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 227 (4) ◽  
pp. S124
Author(s):  
Chelsey Santino ◽  
Muhammad Zeeshan ◽  
Terence O'Keeffe ◽  
Muhammad N. Khan ◽  
Lynn M. Gries ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. e000677
Author(s):  
Vanessa P Ho ◽  
Sasha D Adams ◽  
Kathleen M O'Connell ◽  
Christine S Cocanour ◽  
Saman Arbabi ◽  
...  

BackgroundOlder patients compose approximately 30% of trauma patients treated in the USA but make up nearly 50% of deaths from trauma. To help standardize and elevate care of these patients, the American College of Surgeons (ACS) Trauma Quality Improvement Program’s best practice guidelines for geriatric trauma management was published in 2013 and that for palliative care was published in 2017. Here, we discuss how palliative care and geriatrics quality metrics can be tracked and used for performance improvement and leveraged as a strength for trauma verification.MethodsWe discuss the viewpoint of the ACS Verification, Review, and Consultation and three case studies, with practical tips and takeaways, of how these measures have been implemented at different institutions.ResultsWe describe the use of (1) targeted educational initiatives, (2) development of a consultation tool based on institutional resources, and (3) application of a nurse-led frailty screen.DiscussionSpecialized care and attention to these vulnerable populations is recommended, but the implementation of these programs can take many shapes.Level of evidence V


2016 ◽  
Vol 81 (6) ◽  
pp. 1150-1155 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bellal Joseph ◽  
Herb Phelan ◽  
Ahmed Hassan ◽  
Tahereh Orouji Jokar ◽  
Terence O’Keeffe ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 212 (1) ◽  
pp. 109-115 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tabitha Garwe ◽  
Roxie M. Albrecht ◽  
Julie A. Stoner ◽  
Stephanie Mitchell ◽  
Prasenjeet Motghare

2018 ◽  
Vol 268 (3) ◽  
pp. 534-540 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kathleen M. O’Connell ◽  
D. Alex Quistberg ◽  
Robert Tessler ◽  
Bryce R. H. Robinson ◽  
Joseph Cuschieri ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 225 (5) ◽  
pp. 658-665.e3 ◽  
Author(s):  
Annie Cheung ◽  
Barbara Haas ◽  
Thom J. Ringer ◽  
Amanda McFarlan ◽  
Camilla L. Wong

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nasen J. Zhang ◽  
Liron Sinvani ◽  
Tung Ming Leung ◽  
Michael Qiu ◽  
Cristy L. Meyer ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Given the increasing age and medical complexity of trauma patients, medical comanagement has been adopted as a strategy for high-risk patients. This study aimed to determine whether a geriatrics-focused hospitalist trauma comanagement program improves outcomes.Methods: A pre- and post-implementation study compared older adult trauma patients who were comanaged by a hospitalist with those prior to comanagement at a Level 1 trauma center. Criteria for comanagement included: age 65+, multiple comorbidities, and use of high-risk medications. Comanagement focused on geriatric trauma management guidelines. One-to-one propensity score matching (PSM) was performed based on age, gender, Injury Severity Score, Charlson comorbidity index, and initial admission to the intensive care unit (ICU). Outcomes included hospital mortality, length of stay (LOS), and orders for geriatrics-focused quality indicators. Differences were compared with the Wilcoxon Rank Sum test for continuous variables and chi- square or Fisher’s exact test for categorical variables.Results: From 792 control and 365 intervention patients, PSM resulted in 290 matched pairs. Three intervention group patients died compared to 14 in the control group (p=0.0068). Hospital LOS, 30-day readmission, ICU LOS, and ICU upgrades were not significantly different between groups. There was an overall trend toward improved geriatrics-focused quality indicators in the intervention group. Intervention group was less likely to be restrained (p=0.04), received earlier physical therapy (p=0.01), more doses of acetaminophen compared to control patients (p<0.0001), and more subcutaneous enoxaparin rather than heparin (p=0.0027).Discussion: Our main findings highlight the higher medical complexity and increased risks in older adult trauma patients, as well as the mortality reduction and adherence increase to geriatrics-focused quality indicators. Limitations of our study included use of a single center, the possibility of selection bias in analyzing historical data, and a low sample size, all of which may limit generalizability. Conclusions: Our study demonstrates that a geriatrics-focused hospitalist trauma comanagement program improves survival and quality of care.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document