scholarly journals Mechanisms of force depression caused by different types of physical exercise studied by direct electrical stimulation of human quadriceps muscle

2016 ◽  
Vol 116 (11-12) ◽  
pp. 2215-2224 ◽  
Author(s):  
Albertas Skurvydas ◽  
Gediminas Mamkus ◽  
Sigitas Kamandulis ◽  
Vilma Dudoniene ◽  
Dovile Valanciene ◽  
...  
1982 ◽  
Vol 75 (3) ◽  
pp. 589-599 ◽  
Author(s):  
M.Mazher Jaweed ◽  
Gerald J. Herbison ◽  
John F. Ditunno

2014 ◽  
Vol 37 (3) ◽  
pp. 527-533 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrej Šteňo ◽  
Vladimír Hollý ◽  
Martin Fabian ◽  
Matúš Kuniak ◽  
Gabriela Timárová ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 026015 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leah Muller ◽  
John D Rolston ◽  
Neal P Fox ◽  
Robert Knowlton ◽  
Vikram R Rao ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Ritopa Das ◽  
Sofia Langou ◽  
Thinh T. Le ◽  
Pooja Prasad ◽  
Feng Lin ◽  
...  

Immunotherapy is becoming a very common treatment for cancer, using approaches like checkpoint inhibition, T cell transfer therapy, monoclonal antibodies and cancer vaccination. However, these approaches involve high doses of immune therapeutics with problematic side effects. A promising approach to reducing the dose of immunotherapeutic agents given to a cancer patient is to combine it with electrical stimulation, which can act in two ways; it can either modulate the immune system to produce the immune cytokines and agents in the patient’s body or it can increase the cellular uptake of these immune agents via electroporation. Electrical stimulation in form of direct current has been shown to reduce tumor sizes in immune-competent mice while having no effect on tumor sizes in immune-deficient mice. Several studies have used nano-pulsed electrical stimulations to activate the immune system and drive it against tumor cells. This approach has been utilized for different types of cancers, like fibrosarcoma, hepatocellular carcinoma, human papillomavirus etc. Another common approach is to combine electrochemotherapy with immune modulation, either by inducing immunogenic cell death or injecting immunostimulants that increase the effectiveness of the treatments. Several therapies utilize electroporation to deliver immunostimulants (like genes encoded with cytokine producing sequences, cancer specific antigens or fragments of anti-tumor toxins) more effectively. Lastly, electrical stimulation of the vagus nerve can trigger production and activation of anti-tumor immune cells and immune reactions. Hence, the use of electrical stimulation to modulate the immune system in different ways can be a promising approach to treat cancer.


1993 ◽  
Vol 264 (3) ◽  
pp. G486-G491 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Tougas ◽  
P. Hudoba ◽  
D. Fitzpatrick ◽  
R. H. Hunt ◽  
A. R. Upton

Cerebral evoked responses following direct electrical stimulation of the vagus and esophagus were compared in 8 epileptic subjects and with those recorded after esophageal stimulation in 12 healthy nonepileptic controls. Direct vagal stimulation was performed using a left cervical vagal pacemaker, which is used in the treatment of epilepsy. Esophageal stimulation was obtained with the use of an esophageal assembly incorporating two electrodes positioned 5 and 20 cm orad to the lower esophageal sphincter. Evoked potential responses were recorded with the use of 20 scalp electrodes. The evoked potential responses consisted of three distinct negative peaks and were similar with the use of either vagal or esophageal stimulation. The measured conduction velocity of the afferent response was 7.5 m/s in epileptic subjects and 10 m/s in healthy controls, suggesting that afferent conduction is through A delta-fibers rather than slower C afferent fibers. We conclude that the cortical-evoked potential responses following esophageal electrical stimulation are comparable to direct electrical stimulation of the vagus nerve and involve mostly A delta-fibers. This approach provides a method for the assessment of vagal afferent gastrointestinal sensory pathways in health and disease.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document