Gastric gland mucin-specific O-glycan expression decreases as tumor cells progress from lobular endocervical gland hyperplasia to cervical mucinous carcinoma, gastric type

2018 ◽  
Vol 473 (3) ◽  
pp. 305-311 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kazuhiro Yamanoi ◽  
Keiko Ishii ◽  
Michihiko Tsukamoto ◽  
Shiho Asaka ◽  
Jun Nakayama
2020 ◽  
Vol 77 (3) ◽  
pp. 511-513
Author(s):  
Masakazu Fujimoto ◽  
Sachiko Minamiguchi ◽  
Ayami Ishida ◽  
Shinji Sumiyoshi ◽  
Naoki Horikawa ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Eunhyang Park ◽  
Sang Wun Kim ◽  
Sunghoon Kim ◽  
Hyun-Soo Kim ◽  
Jung-Yun Lee ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 38 (6) ◽  
pp. 3551-3558 ◽  
Author(s):  
TAEK CHUNG ◽  
SUNG-IM DO ◽  
KIYONG NA ◽  
GEON KIM ◽  
YOUNG IN JEONG ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 2009 ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Yuichi Sanada ◽  
Shinji Osada ◽  
Yoshihiro Tanaka ◽  
Yasuharu Tokuyama ◽  
Kazuhiro Yoshida

A 64-year-old man underwent MRCP for further examination of gallbladder stones and IPMN of branch-type (IPMN-Br) was pointed out. Yearly MRCP had revealed the gradual increase of the cystic components, marked dilation of the main pancreatic duct (MPD), and filling defects in the MPD. After follow-up for three years, he underwent pancreatoduodenectomy. Histologically, the dilated MPD and connecting dilated branch ducts were filled with nodular growth of tumor cells consisting of gastric-type adenoma with pyloric gland-like structures. In the MPD, a transition from gastric-type adenoma to intestinal-type carcinoma was observed. In addition, in a dilated branch duct, some components of intestinal-type carcinoma with marked arborizing structures were observed. A minimally invasion was observed around branch ducts. Immunohistochemistry revealed diffuse nuclear accumulation of PCNA and Ki67 in the tumor cells of branch dusts. Our observations suggest that the secondary infiltration to the MPD of IPMN-Br and IPMN-Br possesses malignant potential for microinvasion.


2018 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. 99-106 ◽  
Author(s):  
Atsumi Kojima ◽  
Muneaki Shimada ◽  
Yoshiki Mikami ◽  
Shoji Nagao ◽  
Nobuhiro Takeshima ◽  
...  

ObjectiveGastric-type mucinous carcinoma (GAS) is a novel variant of mucinous carcinoma of the uterine cervix, characterized by aggressive clinical behavior and absence of high-risk human papillomavirus. We conducted this study to evaluate the chemosensitivity of GAS compared with that of usual-type endocervical adenocarcinoma (UEA) in patients who had been enrolled in our previous study.MethodsOf 52 patients from our previous phase 2 study (SGSG005) of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with docetaxel and carboplatin for stage IB2 to IIB nonsquamous cervical cancer, 47 (stage IB2, 12; stage IIA2, 7; stage IIB, 28) were enrolled in this study with written informed consent. The biopsy specimens before neoadjuvant chemotherapy and surgical specimens after chemotherapy were centrally reviewed based on the updated World Health Organization classification (2014).ResultsOf 47 patients with nonsquamous cell carcinoma, 20 (42.6%) were diagnosed with UEA, 13 (27.7%) with GAS, 12 (25.5%) with adenosquamous carcinoma, and 1 patient each (2%) with small cell carcinoma and serous carcinoma. Consequently, 33 patients, consisting of 20 patients with UEA and 13 patients with GAS, were eligible for the current study. The response rate of GAS was significantly lower than that of UEA (46.2% vs 85.0%, P = 0.048). Of 16 cases of stage II UEA, 11 (68.8%) were downstaged on microscopic examination of postsurgical specimens, but none of the 8 patients with stage II GAS showed any response (P < 0.01). Two inoperative tumors were GAS. With a median follow-up duration of 56 months, the 5-year progression-free and overall survival rates of GAS were significantly worse than those of UEA (38.5% vs 75.0% [P = 0.011] and 36.9% vs 90.0% [P < 0.001], respectively).ConclusionsThese findings suggest that GAS should be distinguished from UEA by its chemoresistance, necessitating an alternative treatment strategy established for this distinct subtype of endocervical adenocarcinoma.


2019 ◽  
Vol 153 (1) ◽  
pp. 13-19 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shin Nishio ◽  
Yoshiki Mikami ◽  
Hideki Tokunaga ◽  
Nobuo Yaegashi ◽  
Toyomi Satoh ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document