Role of an intronic polymorphism in the PDCD1 gene with the risk of sporadic systemic lupus erythematosus and the occurrence of antiphospholipid antibodies

2004 ◽  
Vol 115 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
DharambirK. Sanghera ◽  
Susan Manzi ◽  
Franklin Bontempo ◽  
Cara Nestlerode ◽  
M.Ilyas Kamboh
Reumatismo ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 68 (3) ◽  
pp. 137 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Taraborelli ◽  
M.G. Lazzaroni ◽  
N. Martinazzi ◽  
M. Fredi ◽  
I. Cavazzana ◽  
...  

The objective is to investigate the role of clinically significant antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) in a cohort of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients. All SLE patients followed for at least 5 years and with available aPL profile at the beginning of the follow-up in our center were studied. Clinically significant aPL were defined as: positive lupus anticoagulant test, anti-cardiolipin and/or anti- β2Glycoprotein I IgG/IgM &gt;99<sup>th</sup> percentile on two or more occasions at least 12 weeks apart. Patients with and without clinically significant aPL were compared by univariate (Chi square or Fisher’s exact test for categorical variables and Student’s <em>t</em> or Mann-Whitney test for continuous variables) and multivariate analysis (logistic regression analysis). P values &lt;0.05 were considered significant. Among 317 SLE patients studied, 117 (37%) had a clinically significant aPL profile at baseline. Such patients showed at univariate analysis an increased prevalence of deep venous thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, cardiac valvular disease, cognitive dysfunction and antiphospholipid syndrome (APS), but a reduced prevalence of acute cutaneous lupus and anti-extractable nuclear antigens (ENA) when compared with patients without clinically significant aPL. Multivariate analysis confirmed the association between clinically significant aPL and reduced risk of acute cutaneous lupus [p=0.003, odds ratio (OR) 0.43] and ENA positivity (p&lt;0.001, OR 0.37), with increased risk of cardiac valvular disease (p=0.024, OR 3.1) and APS (p&lt;0.0001, OR 51.12). Triple positivity was the most frequent profile and was significantly associated to APS (p&lt;0.0001, OR 28.43). Our study showed that one third of SLE patients had clinically significant aPL, and that this is associated with an increased risk, especially for triple positive, of APS, and to a different clinical and serological pattern of disease even in the absence of APS.


2020 ◽  
Vol 23 (13) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ikram khazal Qasim Al- hasso ◽  
Aida Rashid Al- Derzi ◽  
Ahmed Abdul-hassan Abbas ◽  
Faiq I. Gorial ◽  
Ahmed Sameer Alnuimi

2018 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 145-152 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhaleh Shariati Sarabi ◽  
Maryam Sahebari ◽  
Ali Etemad Rezaie ◽  
Mohammad Taghi Norouzi ◽  
Kamila Hashemzadeh ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
pp. 2050313X2091002 ◽  
Author(s):  
Umut Selamet ◽  
Ramy M Hanna ◽  
Anthony Sisk ◽  
Lama Abdelnour ◽  
Lena Ghobry ◽  
...  

Drug-induced lupus erythematosus has features distinct from primary systemic lupus erythematosus. It can occur with a wide variety of agents that result in the generation of anti-histone or other types of antibodies. Systemic manifestations of drug-induced systemic lupus erythematosus may include renal dysfunction due to circulating immune complexes or due to other immune reactions to the culprit medication(s). Acute interstitial nephritis occurs due to DNA–drug or protein–drug complexes that trigger an allergic immune response. We report a patient who developed acute kidney injury, rash, and drug-induced systemic lupus diagnosed by serologies after starting chlorthalidone and amiodarone. A renal biopsy showed acute interstitial nephritis and not lupus-induced glomerulonephritis. It is important to note that systemic lupus erythematosus and acute interstitial nephritis can occur together, and this report highlights the role of the kidney biopsy in ascertaining the pathological diagnosis and outlining therapy in drug-induced lupus erythematosus.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document