scholarly journals Phone follow-up after inguinal hernia repair

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Natalie Liu ◽  
Jacob A. Greenberg ◽  
Yiwei Xu ◽  
Amber L. Shada ◽  
Luke M. Funk ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Inguinal Hernia ◽  
Hernia Repair ◽  
Inguinal Hernia Repair

Inguinal Hernia Repair Using Self-adhering Sutureless Mesh: Adhesix™: A 3-Year Follow-up with Low Chronic Pain and Recurrence Rate

2016 ◽  
Vol 82 (2) ◽  
pp. 112-116 ◽  
Author(s):  
Malek Tabbara ◽  
Laurent Genser ◽  
Manuela Bossi ◽  
Maxime Barat ◽  
Claude Polliand ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Pain ◽  
Inguinal Hernia ◽  
Postoperative Pain ◽  
Postoperative Complications ◽  
Hernia Repair ◽  
Inguinal Hernia Repair ◽  
Recurrence Rate ◽  
Initial Surgery ◽  
Complications Rate

To review our experience and outcomes after inguinal hernia repair using the lightweight self-adhering sutureless mesh “Adhesix™” and demonstrate the safety and efficacy of this mesh. This is a 3-year retrospective study that included 143 consecutive patients who underwent 149 inguinal hernia repairs at our department of surgery. All hernias were repaired using a modified Lichtenstein technique. Preoperative, perioperative, and postoperative data were prospectively collected. Incidence of chronic pain, postoperative complications, recurrence, and patient satisfaction were assessed three years postoperatively by conducting a telephone survey. We had 143 patients with a mean age of 58 years (17–84), who underwent 149 hernia repairs using the Adhesix™ mesh. Ninety-two per cent (131 patients) were males. Only 10 patients (7%) had a postoperative pain for more than three years. In our series, neither age nor gender was predictive of postoperative pain. Only one patient had a hematoma lasting for more than one month and only four patients (2.8%) had a recurrence of their hernia within three years of their initial surgery. Ninety per cent of the patient expressed their satisfaction when surveyed three years after their surgery. In conclusion, the use of the self-adhering sutureless mesh for inguinal hernia repair has been proving itself as effective as the traditional mesh. Adhesix™ is associated with low chronic pain rate, recurrence rate, and postoperative complications rate, and can be safely adopted as the sole technique for inguinal hernia repair.

Routine inguinal hernia repair in the pediatric population: Is office follow-up necessary?

1993 ◽  
Vol 28 (9) ◽  
pp. 1185-1187 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Koulack ◽  
P. Fitzgerald ◽  
D.A. Gillis ◽  
M. Giacomantonio
Keyword(s):  
Inguinal Hernia ◽  
Hernia Repair ◽  
Inguinal Hernia Repair ◽  
Pediatric Population

Follow-up after inguinal hernia repair. Questionnaire compared with physical examination: a prospective study in 299 patients

2003 ◽  
Vol 164 (7) ◽  
pp. 533-536 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrick M. Vos ◽  
Maarten P. Simons ◽  
Jan S. K. Luitse ◽  
Dick van Geldere ◽  
Mark J. W. Koelemaij ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Inguinal Hernia ◽  
Physical Examination ◽  
Hernia Repair ◽  
Prospective Study ◽  
Inguinal Hernia Repair ◽  
A Prospective Study

scholarly journals O12 OPEN PREPERITONEAL INGUINAL HERNIA REPAIR, TREPP VERSUS TIPP IN A RANDOMIZED CLINICAL TRIAL

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_8) ◽  
Author(s):  
Willem Bökkerink ◽  
Giel Koning ◽  
Patrick Vriens ◽  
Roland Mollen ◽  
Willem Akkersdijk ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Inguinal Hernia ◽  
Hernia Repair ◽  
Learning Curve ◽  
Randomized Clinical Trial ◽  
Inguinal Hernia Repair ◽  
Recurrence Rates ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Related Quality

Abstract Aim The preperitoneal mesh position for inguinal hernia repair showed beneficial results regarding Chronic Postoperative Inguinal Pain (CPIP) with low recurrence rates. Two open preperitoneal techniques, the TransREctus Sheath PrePeritoneal (TREPP) and the TransInguinal PrePeritoneal (TIPP) technique, were compared in a randomized clinical trial with the hypothesis of less patients with CPIP after TREPP due to complete avoidance of nerve contact. Materials and Methods Adult patients with a primary unilateral inguinal hernia were randomized to either TREPP or TIPP in four hospitals. Prior to the trial’s start the study protocol was ethically approved and published. Outcomes included CPIP after 1 year (primary outcome) and recurrence rates, adverse events and Health related Quality of Life (secondary outcomes). Follow-up was performed at 2 weeks, 6 months and 1 year. Results Baseline characteristics were comparable in both groups. Pain was less often present after TREPP at 2 weeks and 6 months, but the CPIP at rest at 1 year was comparable 1.9% after TREPP vs 1.4% after TIPP, p = 0.535). The overall recurrence rate was higher in the TREPP group, 8.9% vs 4.6%, p = 0.022). Corrected for a learning curve for TREPP, no significant difference could be assessed (TREPP 5.7% and TIPP 4.8%, p = 0.591). Conclusions both the TREPP and TIPP technique resulted in a low incidence of CPIP after 1 year follow-up. The TREPP method can be considered a solid method for inguinal hernia repair if expertise is present. The learning curve of the TREPP techniques needs further evaluation.

Follow-up after laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair, can it be done by phone? A prospective study in 300 patients, the PINQ-PHONE

2015 ◽  
Vol 29 (11) ◽  
pp. 3292-3297 ◽  
Author(s):  
Baukje van den Heuvel ◽  
J. A. van Jarwaarde ◽  
P. Wichers ◽  
E. S. M. de Lange de Klerk ◽  
H. J. Bonjer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Inguinal Hernia ◽  
Hernia Repair ◽  
Prospective Study ◽  
Inguinal Hernia Repair ◽  
Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair ◽  
Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia ◽  
A Prospective Study

Watchful Waiting versus Surgery for Inguinal Hernia

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rachel J. Kwon
Keyword(s):  
Inguinal Hernia ◽  
Hernia Repair ◽  
Inguinal Hernia Repair ◽  
Clinical Case ◽  
Watchful Waiting ◽  
Surgical Repair ◽  
Hernia Surgery ◽  
Study Intervention ◽  
Landmark Study

This chapter provides a summary of a landmark study in hernia surgery. For men with minimally symptomatic inguinal hernias, does deferring surgical repair until symptoms develop lead to worse outcomes with respect to pain and physical function? Starting with that question, it describes the basics of the study, including funding, year study began, year study was published, study location, who was studied, who was excluded, how many patients, study design, study intervention, follow-up, endpoints, results, and criticism and limitations. The chapter briefly reviews other relevant studies and information, gives a summary and discusses implications, and concludes with a relevant clinical case involving inguinal hernia repair.

Robotic Inguinal Hernia Repair

2017 ◽  
Vol 83 (12) ◽  
pp. 1418-1421 ◽  
Author(s):  
David S. Edelman
Keyword(s):  
Inguinal Hernia ◽  
Hernia Repair ◽  
Inguinal Hernia Repair ◽  
Open Repair ◽  
Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair ◽  
Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia ◽  
American Society ◽  
Robotic Inguinal Hernia Repair ◽  
Room Time

Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair has certain advantages over open repair including less pain and earlier return to normal activity. Concurrent robotic inguinal hernia repair at the time of prostatectomy has been shown to have a lower recurrence rate than open repair. Robotic surgery adds high definition visualization and articulating instruments which enhances dexterity that makes laparoscopic hernia repair more refined. A series of robotic, laparoscopic, inguinal hernia repairs by a single surgeon with an extensive laparoscopic hernia experience at a single institution was undertaken to determine the role of robotic laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair in minimally invasive surgery. Five hundred forty-two laparoscopic inguinal hernia operations were performed from April 2012 through December 2015. There were 154 cases of robotic transabdominal pre-peritoneal procedures done during that time. Hospital records and follow-up care were pro-spectively reviewed and data collected for age, sex, American Society of Anesthesia class, and operative time. Follow-up was done at 2, 8, and 16 weeks after surgery. All patients consented for the study. Ninety percent of the patients were male. Age averaged 57.04 years with a range of 21 to 85 years. American Society of Anesthesia averaged 2.01 with comorbidities of hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, and gastroesophageal reflux disease being the most common. Body mass index was between 19 and 31.6, averaging 24.34. Twenty-five patients (16%) had an umbilical hernia repair done concomitantly. Operating room time ranged from 25 to 140 minutes with an average of 63.6 minutes decreased as experience increased. One patient with a large, left scrotal hernia was converted to open; one patient developed perforated sigmoid diverticulitis seven days postop and case #5 recurred indirectly after a direct hernia repair. Four patients required prolonged postoperative Foley catheterization. Robotic inguinal hernia repair is safe and effective. Operating room time was longer than standard laparoscopic herniorrhaphy but decreased with experience. A single-port platform may have use in patients with umbilical hernias, 16 per cent, and will need to be studied.

Laparoscopic cauterization of hernia sac in girls; the Burnia technique

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sabriye Dayı
Keyword(s):  
Inguinal Hernia ◽  
Hernia Repair ◽  
Inguinal Hernia Repair ◽  
Abdominal Cavity ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
Contralateral Side ◽  
Hernia Sac ◽  
Inguinal Hernias ◽  
Laparoscopic Techniques

INTRODUCTION: Inguinal hernia repair is one of the most common surgical procedures in pediatric surgery. In parallel with the advances in the field of medicine, various laparoscopic techniques have been developed in inguinal hernia repair. The Burnia technique is one of the latest published techniques and it is the cauterization of the inguinal hernia sac laparoscopically without using sutures in girls. The aim of this study is the investigation of the use of Burnia technique in clinical practice, and its postoperative outcomes. Any article concerning the use of this technique in Turkey has not been encountered. METHODS: The demographic features of patients, preoperative, peroperative, postoperative and follow-up results of 41 patients who had been operated with Burnia technique by a single surgeon within 2 years were reviewed retrospectively. Laparoscopically, the camera was first placed at an inclination of 30 degrees to the umbilical region using Hasson technique, and then, a single port was used for cauterization of the hernia sac. The Hernia sac was pulled into the abdominal cavity and cauterized. RESULTS: Burnia technique was applied to 62 inguinal hernia sacs in 41 girls. Their ages ranged from 1.5 to 16 years (median 36 months) with body weights ranging between 3.5 kg-40 kg (median 12 kg). Preoperatively 15 patients had right (37%), 19 patients left (46%), 7 patients bilateral inguinal hernias (17%). During surgery, 14 of the unilateral inguinal hernias were found to have a hernia sac on the contralateral side, and the rate of bilateral hernia increased to 51 percent. In one patient ovary was in the inguinal canal, and after its reduction, we proceeded with the operation Unexpectedly. in one patient, right ovarian torsion was detected which was detorsioned, and hernia surgery was performed in the same session. The duration of the operation was 5-35 min (median 15 min) for unilateral and 8-45 min (median 20 minutes) for bilateral hernias. None of these patients developed peroperative and postoperative complications. Follow-up time was minimum 10 months, and maximum 3 years. Recurrence was not detected. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: Burnia technique seems to be effective and safe. The contralateral side and other intra-abdominal pathologies are explored. The cosmetic appearance is its another advantage. The operation time is very short due to the fact that only the hernia sac is cauterized. Comparison of this technique with other laparoscopic techniques is planned in the future study.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document