Adoptation of an evidence-based clinical practice guideline in cancer pain management by medical oncologists: a case vignette study

2014 ◽  
Vol 23 (5) ◽  
pp. 1409-1420 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nienke te Boveldt ◽  
Myrra Vernooij-Dassen ◽  
Kees Besse ◽  
Kris Vissers ◽  
Yvonne Engels
2022 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Long Ge ◽  
Qi Wang ◽  
Yihan He ◽  
Darong Wu ◽  
Qi Zhou ◽  
...  

Abstract Background This study aims to develop an evidence-based clinical practice guideline of acupuncture in the treatment of patients with moderate and severe cancer pain. Methods The development of this guideline was triggered by a systematic review published in JAMA Oncology in 2020. We searched databases and websites for evidence on patient preferences and values, and other resources of using acupuncture for treatment of cancer pain. Recommendations were developed through a Delphi consensus of an international multidisciplinary panel including 13 western medicine oncologists, Chinese medicine/acupuncture clinical practitioners, and two patient representatives. The certainty of evidence, patient preferences and values, resources, and other factors were fully considered in formulating the recommendations. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach was employed to rate the certainty of evidence and the strength of recommendations. Results The guideline proposed three recommendations: (1) a strong recommendation for the treatment of acupuncture rather than no treatment to relieve pain in patients with moderate to severe cancer pain; (2) a weak recommendation for the combination treatments with acupuncture/acupressure to reduce pain intensity, decrease the opioid dose, and alleviate opioid-related side effects in moderate to severe cancer pain patients who are using analgesics; and (3) a strong recommendation for acupuncture in breast cancer patients to relieve their aromatase inhibitor-induced arthralgia. Conclusion This proposed guideline provides recommendations for the management of patients with cancer pain. The small sample sizes of evidence limit the strength of the recommendations and highlights the need for additional research.


Author(s):  
Leslie Verville ◽  
Pierre Côté DC ◽  
Diane Grondin ◽  
Silvano Mior DC ◽  
Robin Kay

Objective To develop an online, interactive educational tool to deliver an evidence-based clinical practice guideline to faculty members at a Canadian chiropractic college. Second, to evaluate the learning, design, and engagement constructs of the tool in a sample of chiropractic faculty members. Methods Using an integrated knowledge translation methodology and the Knowledge to Action Framework, we developed an evidence-based online learning tool. The context of the tool focused on a clinical practice guideline on the management of neck pain. We evaluated the learning, design, and engagement constructs in a sample of faculty members and residents using the Learning Object Evaluation Scale for Students. Participants were also asked to provide suggestions for improvement of the tool. Results Sixteen participants completed the evaluation. Most (68.8%) participants were chiropractors, 75% were male and 56% were between the ages of 25 and 44 years. At least 75% of participants agreed that the learning, design, and engagement constructs of the learning tool were adequate. The open-ended suggestions unveiled 3 pedagogical themes, relating to multimedia, thinking skills, and learner control, within the tool that could benefit from further development. These themes informed recommendations to improve the tool. Conclusion Our online, interactive, module-based learning tool has sound pedagogical properties. Further research is needed to determine if its use is associated with a change in knowledge.


2021 ◽  
Vol 47 (7) ◽  
pp. 891-907
Author(s):  
Andrew Chen ◽  
John G. Albertini ◽  
Jeremy S. Bordeaux ◽  
Michael W. Chen ◽  
Jonathan L. Cook ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document