Supporting colorectal cancer survivors using eHealth: a systematic review and framework suggestion

2020 ◽  
Vol 28 (8) ◽  
pp. 3543-3555
Author(s):  
Seyed Mohammad Ayyoubzadeh ◽  
Sharareh R. Niakan Kalhori ◽  
Mohammad Shirkhoda ◽  
Niloofar Mohammadzadeh ◽  
Marzieh Esmaeili
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Cancer Survivors ◽  
Colorectal Cancer Survivors

scholarly journals Ethnic disparities in colonoscopy use among colorectal cancer survivors: a systematic review

2012 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 372-378 ◽  
Author(s):  
Talya Salz ◽  
Heidi Woo ◽  
Tatiana D. Starr ◽  
Lina H. Jandorf ◽  
Katherine N. DuHamel
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Cancer Survivors ◽  
Ethnic Disparities ◽  
Colorectal Cancer Survivors

scholarly journals Systematic Review of Cognitive Impairment in Colorectal Cancer Survivors Who Received Chemotherapy

2021 ◽  
Vol 48 (6) ◽  
pp. 634-647
Author(s):  
Ya-Ning Chan ◽  
Ashley Leak Bryant ◽  
Jamie Conklin ◽  
Tyra Girdwood ◽  
Aaron Piepmeier ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Cognitive Impairment ◽  
Cancer Survivors ◽  
Colorectal Cancer Survivors

scholarly journals Receipt of recommended surveillance among colorectal cancer survivors: a systematic review

2013 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 464-483 ◽  
Author(s):  
Melissa Y. Carpentier ◽  
Sally W. Vernon ◽  
L. Kay Bartholomew ◽  
Caitlin C. Murphy ◽  
Shirley M. Bluethmann
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Cancer Survivors ◽  
Colorectal Cancer Survivors

Exercise intervention for post-treatment colorectal cancer survivors: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (6) ◽  
pp. 878-893 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ruitong Gao ◽  
Tianzhuo Yu ◽  
Lu Liu ◽  
Jiasi Bi ◽  
Huiying Zhao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Cancer Survivors ◽  
Exercise Intervention ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Post Treatment ◽  
Colorectal Cancer Survivors

scholarly journals Candidate Predictors of Health‐Related Quality of Life of Colorectal Cancer Survivors: A Systematic Review

2016 ◽  
Vol 21 (4) ◽  
pp. 433-452 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martijn J.L. Bours ◽  
Bernadette W.A. Linden ◽  
Renate M. Winkels ◽  
Fränzel J. Duijnhoven ◽  
Floortje Mols ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Cancer Survivors ◽  
Health Related Quality ◽  
Colorectal Cancer Survivors ◽  
Related Quality ◽  
Health Related

A systematic review and meta-analysis of physical activity interventions among colorectal cancer survivors

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (5) ◽  
pp. 1134-1143
Author(s):  
Yves Paul Mbous ◽  
Jayeshkumar Patel ◽  
Kimberly M Kelly
Keyword(s):  
Physical Activity ◽  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Cancer Survivors ◽  
Goal Setting ◽  
Transtheoretical Model ◽  
Cognitive Theory ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Colorectal Cancer Survivors ◽  
Small Effect Size

Abstract With the growing number of colorectal cancer survivors (CRCS), theory-based, high-quality physical activity (PA) interventions are needed to promote quality and quantity of life. This systematic review and meta-analysis synthesized theory-based PA interventions among CRCS. Using PubMed, PsyINFO, CINAHL, MEDLINE, SportDiscus, and Cochrane databases, studies including CRCS participants, a PA outcome, a behavioral theory/model or behavior change techniques (BCTs), and randomized research design were identified. Two reviewers coded BCT, intervention reproducibility (Template for Intervention Description and Replication–TIDier), risk of bias, and quality of evidence. From an initial screen of 1,328 articles, 10 RCTs met our inclusion criteria. The Transtheoretical Model (n = 3), Social Cognitive Theory (n = 3), and Theory of Planned Behavior (n = 2) were the most used theories. “Goal setting (behavior)” (n = 10), “goal setting (outcome)” (n = 10), “action planning” (n = 9), and “problem solving” (n = 9) were the most commonly used BCTs. Intervention modalities were primarily print material based (n = 4) and telephone counseling (n = 4). Findings demonstrated that theory-based PA interventions are successful at increasing PA among CRCS as meta-analysis evidenced a small effect size of 0.26. TDier items 3, 9, and 12 hindered intervention replicability. Lack of blinding and bias in the measurement of outcomes by assessors resulted in serious bias. In-depth theoretical applications are needed for PA interventions that minimize bias and improve outcomes measurement. Intervention adherence and fidelity, as well as theoretical construct measurement pre- and post-intervention, will enhance the behavioral research enterprise. PROSPERO registration: CRD42019142816.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document