scholarly journals A neural integrator model for planning and value-based decision making of a robotics assistant

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Weronika Wojtak ◽  
Flora Ferreira ◽  
Paulo Vicente ◽  
Luís Louro ◽  
Estela Bicho ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Neural Integrator ◽  
Integrator Model

scholarly journals The role of pallidum in the neural integrator model of cervical dystonia

2019 ◽  
Vol 125 ◽  
pp. 45-54 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexey Sedov ◽  
Svetlana Usova ◽  
Ulia Semenova ◽  
Anna Gamaleya ◽  
Alexey Tomskiy ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cervical Dystonia ◽  
Neural Integrator ◽  
Integrator Model

scholarly journals A Leaky-Integrator Model as a Control Mechanism Underlying Flexible Decision Making during Task Switching

PLoS ONE ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. e59670 ◽  
Author(s):  
Akinori Mitani ◽  
Ryo Sasaki ◽  
Masafumi Oizumi ◽  
Takanori Uka
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Task Switching ◽  
Control Mechanism ◽  
Leaky Integrator ◽  
Integrator Model

Discarding optimality: Throwing out the baby with the bathwater?

2018 ◽  
Vol 41 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrick Simen ◽  
Fuat Balcı
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Perceptual Decision Making ◽  
Reward Rate ◽  
Perceptual Decision ◽  
Standard Observer ◽  
Rate Maximization ◽  
Reward Rate Maximization ◽  
Descriptive Standard ◽  
Observer Model

AbstractRahnev & Denison (R&D) argue against normative theories and in favor of a more descriptive “standard observer model” of perceptual decision making. We agree with the authors in many respects, but we argue that optimality (specifically, reward-rate maximization) has proved demonstrably useful as a hypothesis, contrary to the authors’ claims.

LPCD framework: Analytical tool or psychological model?

2018 ◽  
Vol 41 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Danks
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Analytical Tool ◽  
Mathematical Framework ◽  
Bayesian Decision ◽  
Perceptual Decision Making ◽  
Psychological Model ◽  
Psychological Reality ◽  
Psychological Theories ◽  
Target Article ◽  
Bayesian Decision Making

AbstractThe target article uses a mathematical framework derived from Bayesian decision making to demonstrate suboptimal decision making but then attributes psychological reality to the framework components. Rahnev & Denison's (R&D) positive proposal thus risks ignoring plausible psychological theories that could implement complex perceptual decision making. We must be careful not to slide from success with an analytical tool to the reality of the tool components.

Elaborating the role of reflection and individual differences in the study of folk-economic beliefs

2018 ◽  
Vol 41 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kevin Arceneaux
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Individual Differences ◽  
Cognitive Processes ◽  
Evolutionary History ◽  
Behavioral Responses ◽  
History Of ◽  
Economic Beliefs

AbstractIntuitions guide decision-making, and looking to the evolutionary history of humans illuminates why some behavioral responses are more intuitive than others. Yet a place remains for cognitive processes to second-guess intuitive responses – that is, to be reflective – and individual differences abound in automatic, intuitive processing as well.

The primacy of conscious decision making – ERRATUM

2014 ◽  
Vol 38 (01) ◽  
pp. 46
Author(s):  
David R. Shanks ◽  
Ben R. Newell
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Conscious Decision
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document