Is pancreatectomy with arterial reconstruction a safe and useful procedure for locally advanced pancreatic cancer?

2009 ◽  
Vol 16 (6) ◽  
pp. 850-857 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hodaka Amano ◽  
Fumihiko Miura ◽  
Naoyuki Toyota ◽  
Keita Wada ◽  
Ken-ichirou Katoh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Advanced Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Arterial Reconstruction

R0 resection of locally advanced pancreatic cancer encasing major visceral arteries using arterial reconstruction: Short- and long-term results.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e14679-e14679 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuri Genyk ◽  
Lea Matsuoka ◽  
Anthony B. El-Khoueiry ◽  
Syma Iqbal ◽  
James Buxbaum ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Patient Survival ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Advanced Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
R0 Resection ◽  
Arterial Reconstruction ◽  
Arterial Involvement ◽  
Visceral Arteries ◽  
Disease Free

e14679 Background: Locally advanced disease is found in about 40% of patients with pancreatic cancer at initial presentation. Tumors involving major visceral arteries are commonly deemed unresectable. In this study we analyzed the feasibility of R0 resection of locally advanced pancreatic cancer encasing major visceral arteries using arterial reconstruction. Methods: The following data were collected: age, gender, operative details, post-operative complications, chemotherapy and/or radiation therapy and overall and disease free survival. Patient survival was calculated utilizing Kaplan-Meier survival probability estimates. Results: From Dec., 2002 to Jan., 2012, 13 patients underwent pancreatic resection with concomitant resection and reconstruction of major visceral arteries for pancreatic cancer (9 males and 4 females, median age 63 yrs (range: 50–82 yrs)). The arterial involvement included celiac artery (n=6), superior mesenteric artery (n=4) and hepatic artery (n=3). Resections included pancreatico-duodenectomy (n=9), distal pancreatectomy (n=3), and total pancreatectomy (n=1). Management of the arterial involvement included: resection of celiac axis without reconstruction (n=2), reconstruction of one artery (n=6), two arteries (n=4) and three arteries (n=1). Nine of the 13 patients underwent simultaneous venous reconstruction. R0 resection was accomplished in 11, R1 in 1, and R2 in 1 patient. Ten of the 13 patients received neoadjuvant and/or adjuvant chemo- or chemo-radiation therapy outside protocols. To date, 4 patients are alive and disease free at 1, 4, 15 and 111 months, and 1 patient is alive with recurrence at 100 months. Six-month patient survival was 65% and median overall survival was 17 months. The probability of 5-year survival was 22%. Conclusions: Our study indicates that in select patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer with involvement of major visceral arteries R0 resection is feasible by performing pancreatic resection with arterial reconstruction. The survival data in this group of patients are encouraging and provide the opportunity to reconsider the contraindications to surgical management of such patients.

scholarly journals Successful conversion surgery of distal pancreatectomy with celiac axis resection (DP-CAR) with double arterial reconstruction using saphenous vein grafting for locally advanced pancreatic cancer: a case report

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoshiki Murase ◽  
Daisuke Ban ◽  
Aya Maekawa ◽  
Shuichi Watanabe ◽  
Yoshiya Ishikawa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Distal Pancreatectomy ◽  
Saphenous Vein ◽  
Surgical Intervention ◽  
Multidisciplinary Treatment ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Advanced Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Gastroduodenal Artery ◽  
Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Arterial Reconstruction

Abstract Background Pancreatic cancer is a disease with a poor prognosis, requiring multidisciplinary treatment combining chemotherapy and surgery for effective management. Distal pancreatectomy with celiac axis resection (DP-CAR) is a surgical intervention performed for locally advanced pancreatic cancer, but the benefit of arterial reconstruction in DP-CAR is unclear. Case presentation A 49-year-old man with pancreatic cancer was referred to our hospital. Imaging revealed a 54-mm tumor mainly in the pancreatic body, but with arterial infiltration including into the celiac, common hepatic, left gastric, splenic and gastroduodenal arteries. Distant metastases were not detected. The patient was diagnosed with unresectable locally advanced pancreatic cancer and chemoradiotherapy was planned. Three cycles of gemcitabine (1000 mg/m2) plus nab-paclitaxel (125 mg/m2) every 4 weeks were followed by irradiation (2 Gy/day, total 50 Gy over 25 days) together with S-1 administration (80 mg/m2/day). A partial response (PR) according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) was achieved, so surgical intervention was considered. Because the tumor had invaded the root of the gastroduodenal artery, we performed DP-CAR with resection of the gastroduodenal artery, followed by arterial reconstruction of the proper hepatic and left gastric arteries, anastomosed with the abdominal aorta using a great saphenous vein graft in the shape of a “Y”. Histopathology showed that 60% of tumor cells were destroyed by the chemoradiotherapy, defined as grade IIb in the Evans classification. No malignancy was detected at the surgical margin, including the celiac artery, gastroduodenal artery or pancreatic stump; thus R0 surgery was successful. S-1 (80 mg/day) was administered as adjuvant chemotherapy for 6 months. The patient is now doing well without recurrence for > 2 years after the initial treatment (more than 16 months after surgery). Conclusion For locally advanced pancreatic cancer, multidisciplinary treatment combining gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel-based chemoradiotherapy and then DP-CAR surgery with gastroduodenal artery resection and arterial reconstruction using saphenous vein grafting enabled R0 resection in this patient and led to a favorable long-term prognosis.

A Critical Overview of Systematic Reviews of Chemotherapy for Advanced and Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer using both AMSTAR2 and ROBIS as Quality Assessment Tools

2020 ◽  
Vol 15 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amit Dang ◽  
Surendar Chidirala ◽  
Prashanth Veeranki ◽  
BN Vallish
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Systematic Reviews ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Advanced Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Risk Of Bias ◽  
Low Risk ◽  
Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Critical Overview

Background: We performed a critical overview of published systematic reviews (SRs) of chemotherapy for advanced and locally advanced pancreatic cancer, and evaluated their quality using AMSTAR2 and ROBIS tools. Materials and Methods: PubMed and Cochrane Central Library were searched for SRs on 13th June 2020. SRs with metaanalysis which included only randomized controlled trials and that had assessed chemotherapy as one of the treatment arms were included. The outcome measures, which were looked into, were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and adverse events (AEs) of grade 3 or above. Two reviewers independently assessed all the SRs with both ROBIS and AMSTAR2. Results: Out of the 1,879 identified records, 26 SRs were included for the overview. Most SRs had concluded that gemcitabine-based combination regimes, prolonged OS and PFS, but increased the incidence of grade 3-4 toxicities, when compared to gemcitabine monotherapy, but survival benefits were not consistent when gemcitabine was combined with molecular targeted agents. As per ROBIS, 24/26 SRs had high risk of bias, with only 1/26 SR having low risk of bias. As per AMSTAR2, 25/26 SRs had critically low, and 1/26 SR had low, confidence in the results. The study which scored ‘low’ risk of bias in ROBIS scored ‘low confidence in results’ in AMSTAR2. The inter-rater reliability for scoring the overall confidence in the SRs with AMSTAR2 and the overall domain in ROBIS was substantial; ROBIS: kappa=0.785, SEM=0.207, p<0.001; AMSTAR2: kappa=0.649, SEM=0.323, p<0.001. Conclusion: Gemcitabine-based combination regimens can prolong OS and PFS but also worsen AEs when compared to gemcitabine monotherapy. The included SRs have an overall low methodological quality and high risk of bias as per AMSTAR2 and ROBIS respectively.

Maintenance therapy with alpha-interferon (IFN-α) in locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC): A pilot study

Pancreatology ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 12 (6) ◽  
pp. 558-559
Author(s):  
S. Cereda ◽  
A. Rognone ◽  
C. Belli ◽  
P. Passoni ◽  
N. Slim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Pilot Study ◽  
Maintenance Therapy ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Advanced Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Alpha Interferon
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document