scholarly journals The contralateral lamina: a reliable guide in subaxial, cervical pedicle screw placement

2008 ◽  
Vol 17 (11) ◽  
pp. 1457-1461 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. G. Hacker ◽  
S. Molloy ◽  
J. Bernard
Keyword(s):  
Pedicle Screw ◽  
Screw Placement ◽  
Pedicle Screw Placement ◽  
Cervical Pedicle Screw ◽  
Cervical Pedicle

Accuracy of Subaxial Cervical Pedicle Screw Placement Using Direct Visualization Versus Computed Tomography–Based Navigation

2021 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Harrison Farber ◽  
Jakub Godzik ◽  
Randall J. Hlubek ◽  
James J. Zhou ◽  
Corey T. Walker ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Pedicle Screw ◽  
Screw Placement ◽  
Direct Visualization ◽  
Pedicle Screw Placement ◽  
Cervical Pedicle Screw ◽  
Cervical Pedicle

scholarly journals Cervical Pedicle Screw Placement Using Medial Funnel Technique

2017 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 84-88 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jung Hwan Lee ◽  
Byung Kwan Choi ◽  
In Ho Han ◽  
Won Gyu Choi ◽  
Kyoung Hyup Nam ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pedicle Screw ◽  
Screw Placement ◽  
Pedicle Screw Placement ◽  
Cervical Pedicle Screw ◽  
Cervical Pedicle ◽  
Funnel Technique

Accuracy and Safety of Lateral Vertebral Notch-Referred Technique Used in Subaxial Cervical Pedicle Screw Placement

2018 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 52-60 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhimin Pan ◽  
Junlong Zhong ◽  
Shiming Xie ◽  
Limin Yu ◽  
Chunyang Wu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pedicle Screw ◽  
Screw Placement ◽  
Pedicle Screw Placement ◽  
Cervical Pedicle Screw ◽  
Cervical Pedicle

Accuracy of Patient-Specific Template-Guided Versus Freehand Cervical Pedicle Screw Placement from C2 to C7: A Randomized Cadaveric Study

2019 ◽  
Vol 126 ◽  
pp. e803-e813 ◽  
Author(s):  
Manuel Moser ◽  
Mazda Farshad ◽  
Nadja A. Farshad-Amacker ◽  
Michael Betz ◽  
José Miguel Spirig
Keyword(s):  
Pedicle Screw ◽  
Cadaveric Study ◽  
Screw Placement ◽  
Patient Specific ◽  
Pedicle Screw Placement ◽  
Cervical Pedicle Screw ◽  
Cervical Pedicle

scholarly journals Efficacy and accuracy of a novel rapid prototyping drill template for cervical pedicle screw placement

2011 ◽  
Vol 16 (5) ◽  
pp. 240-248 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sheng Lu ◽  
Yong Q. Xu ◽  
Guo P. Chen ◽  
Yuan Z. Zhang ◽  
Di Lu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rapid Prototyping ◽  
Pedicle Screw ◽  
Screw Placement ◽  
Pedicle Screw Placement ◽  
Cervical Pedicle Screw ◽  
Cervical Pedicle

Clinical accuracy of three-dimensional fluoroscopy-based computer-assisted cervical pedicle screw placement: a retrospective comparative study of conventional versus computer-assisted cervical pedicle screw placement

2010 ◽  
Vol 13 (5) ◽  
pp. 606-611 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoshimoto Ishikawa ◽  
Tokumi Kanemura ◽  
Go Yoshida ◽  
Zenya Ito ◽  
Akio Muramoto ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pedicle Screw ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Screw Placement ◽  
Computer Assisted ◽  
Pedicle Screw Placement ◽  
Cervical Pedicle Screw ◽  
Retrospective Clinical Study ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Cervical Pedicle ◽  
Grade 3

Object The authors performed a retrospective clinical study to evaluate the feasibility and accuracy of cervical pedicle screw (CPS) placement using 3D fluoroscopy-based navigation (3D FN). Methods The study involved 62 consecutive patients undergoing posterior stabilization of the cervical spine between 2003 and 2008. Thirty patients (126 screws) were treated using conventional techniques (CVTs) with a lateral fluoroscopic view, whereas 32 patients (150 screws) were treated using 3D FN. Screw positions were classified into 4 grades based on the pedicle wall perforations observed on postoperative CT. Results The prevalence of perforations in the CVT group was 27% (34 screws): 92 (73.0%), 12 (9.5%), 6 (4.8%), and 16 (12.7%) for Grade 0 (no perforation), Grade 1 (perforation < 1 mm), Grade 2 (perforation ≥ 1 and < 2 mm), and Grade 3 (perforation ≥ 2 mm), respectively. In the 3D FN group, the prevalence of perforations was 18.7% (28 screws): 122 (81.3%), 17 (11.3%), 6 (4%), and 5 (3.3%) for Grades 0, 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Statistical analysis showed no significant difference in the prevalence of Grade 1 or higher perforations between the CVT and 3D FN groups. A higher prevalence of malpositioned CPSs was seen in Grade 2 or higher (17.5% vs 7.3%, p < 0.05) in the 3D FN group and Grade 3 (12.7% vs 7.3%, p < 0.05) perforations in the CVT group. The ORs for CPS malpositioning in the CVT group were 2.72 (95% CI 1.16–6.39) in Grade 2 or higher perforations and 3.89 (95% CI 1.26–12.02) in Grade 3 perforations. Conclusions Three-dimensional fluoroscopy-based navigation can improve the accuracy of CPS insertion; however, severe CPS malpositioning that causes injury to the vertebral artery or neurological complications can occur even with 3D FN. Advanced techniques for the insertion of CPSs and the use of modified insertion devices can reduce the risk of a malpositioned CPS and provide increased safety.

Rationale for cervical pedicle screw placement in the subaxial spine

2001 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 265-273 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mustasim N. Rumi ◽  
Joseph M. Kowalski ◽  
Daniel E. Gelb ◽  
Steven C. Ludwig
Keyword(s):  
Pedicle Screw ◽  
Screw Placement ◽  
Pedicle Screw Placement ◽  
Cervical Pedicle Screw ◽  
Cervical Pedicle
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document