scholarly journals Efficacy and safety of posteromedial translation for correction of thoracic curves in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis using a new connection to the spine: the Universal Clamp

2008 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 158-169 ◽  
Author(s):  
Keyvan Mazda ◽  
Brice Ilharreborde ◽  
Julien Even ◽  
Yan Lefevre ◽  
Franck Fitoussi ◽  
...  
2014 ◽  
Vol 23 (S4) ◽  
pp. 446-451 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jérôme Sales de Gauzy ◽  
Jean-Luc Jouve ◽  
Brice Ilharreborde ◽  
Benjamin Blondel ◽  
Franck Accadbled ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 2016 ◽  
pp. 1-5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ebrahim Ghayem Hassankhani ◽  
Farzad Omidi-Kashani ◽  
Shahram Moradkhani ◽  
Golnaz Ghayem Hassankhani ◽  
Mohammad Taghi Shakeri

Background. In surgical treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS), hybrid universal clamp system has been used by some authors. We aimed to compare the clinical and radiologic outcome of hybrid universal clamp with hybrid thoracic hook lumbar screw. Methods. A prospective study was performed on 56 consecutive patients with AIS, who had alternatively undergone a posterior spinal fusion and instrumentation with hybrid thoracic hook lumbar screw system (28 patients: group A) and hybrid universal clamp system (28 patients: group B) between June 2006 and January 2014 at Imam Reza University Hospital and had been followed up for more than two years. The comparison was according to radiographic changes, operative time, intraoperative blood loss, complications, and Scoliosis Research Society (SRS-22) outcome scores. Results. The preoperative mean curve Cobb angle was 58°±7° (42°–74°) in group A and 60°±9° (46°–75°) in group B. The mean final coronal curve correction was 60.4% and 75.5% in groups A and B, respectively (P=0.001). Postoperative SRS outcome scores were also comparable. Conclusion. Universal clamp instrumentation had a significantly better curve correction and lower complication rate compared with hybrid thoracic hook lumbar screw. Both instrumentation methods had similar operative time, intraoperative blood loss, and postoperative SRS outcome scores.


2014 ◽  
Vol 2 (5) ◽  
pp. 392-398 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard Anthony Bailey ◽  
Jan William Duncan ◽  
Alan T. Tran ◽  
Jerrold L. Abraham

2019 ◽  
Vol 129 ◽  
pp. e726-e732 ◽  
Author(s):  
Junlong Zhong ◽  
Kai Cao ◽  
Bin Wang ◽  
Xuemei Zhou ◽  
Nan Lin ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Indra K. Shrestha ◽  
Tian-Yi Ruan ◽  
Lan Lin ◽  
Miao Tan ◽  
Xue-Qing Na ◽  
...  

Abstract Background This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of using high-dose intravenous tranexamic acid (TXA) to reduce blood loss in idiopathic scoliosis surgery. Methods This study was a meta-analysis, which consisted of retrospective cohort studies (RCSs) and randomized control trials (RCTs) found by searching electronic databases, namely PubMed, Web of Science, The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and the Google Scholar Database, dating from 1960 to 2019. The points of interest included total blood loss, a need for transfusion and transfusion criteria, surgery time, and the evidence of intraoperative and postoperative complications, such as seizures or thromboembolic events. The weighted mean differences (WMD) and 95% confidence interval (CI) of blood loss in the TXA intervention group compared to the control or placebo group were extracted and combined using the random effects model. Results In this meta-analysis, there was a total of three RCSs and two RCTs, which involved 334 patients. The results showed that blood loss is significantly reduced, with a weighted mean difference in the TXA group (WMD = − 525.14, P = 0.0000, CI ranged from − 839.83, − 210.44, I2 = 82%). Heterogeneity was assessed using the random effects model. Conclusions A high dose of intravenous TXA reduced blood loss during adolescent idiopathic scoliosis surgery and did not lead to any significant thromboembolic event. Therefore, a high dose appears to be effective and safe for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis surgery. However, more high-quality research based on larger randomized controlled trials is still needed.


2011 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 273-282 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jérôme Sale de Gauzy ◽  
Jean-Luc Jouve ◽  
Franck Accadbled ◽  
Benjamin Blondel ◽  
Gérard Bollini

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document