scholarly journals Normative values of spino-pelvic sagittal alignment, balance, age, and health-related quality of life in a cohort of healthy adult subjects

2016 ◽  
Vol 25 (11) ◽  
pp. 3675-3686 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kazuhiro Hasegawa ◽  
Masashi Okamoto ◽  
Shun Hatsushikano ◽  
Haruka Shimoda ◽  
Masatoshi Ono ◽  
...  
2005 ◽  
Vol 174 (5) ◽  
pp. 1944-1947 ◽  
Author(s):  
TATSUAKI YONEDA ◽  
HIROYUKI ADACHI ◽  
SHINJI URAKAMI ◽  
HIROFUMI KISHI ◽  
KAZUSHI SHIGENO ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Roxana Paola Palacios-Cartagena ◽  
Jose Carmelo Adsuar ◽  
Miguel Ángel Hernández-Mocholí ◽  
Jorge Carlos-Vivas ◽  
Sabina Barrios-Fernández ◽  
...  

(1) Introduction: There is a growing interest in health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in adolescent population. The EQ-5D-Y is a generic HRQOL instrument that allows adolescents to understand the health status of different levels of physical, mental, and social health. This study was carried out with an adolescent population in Peru. The main objective of this article is to report the normative values of the EQ-5D-Y questionnaire in Peruvian adolescents. (2) Methods: The EQ-5D-Y questionnaire was administered to Peruvian adolescent students. A total of 1229 young people participated in the survey. The EQ-5D-Y score was reflected as a function of sex and age. (3) Results: The mean utility index of the EQ-5D-Y for the total sample was 0.890; this rating was significantly better for males at (0.899) and females at (0.881). The ceiling effect was higher for adolescent males with (47.3) females (40.7). (4) Conclusions: The results of the present study provide evidence that schooled adolescents show a positive perception of HRQOL.


2013 ◽  
Vol 48 (2) ◽  
pp. 233-241 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kenneth C. Lam ◽  
Alison R. Snyder Valier ◽  
R. Curtis Bay ◽  
Tamara C. Valovich McLeod

Context: Normative scores for patient-rated outcome (PRO) instruments are important for providing patient-centered, whole-person care and making informed clinical decisions. Although normative values for the Pediatric Quality of Life Generic Core Scale (PedsQL) have been established in the general, healthy adolescent population, whether adolescent athletes demonstrate similar values is unclear. Objective: To compare PedsQL scores between adolescent athletes and general, healthy adolescent individuals. Design: Cross-sectional study. Setting: Secondary schools. Patients or Other Participants: A convenience sample of 2659 interscholastic athletes (males = 2059, females = 600, age = 15.7 ± 1.1 years) represented the athlete group (ATH), and a previously published normative dataset represented the general, healthy adolescent group (GEN). Intervention(s): All participants completed the PedsQL during 1 testing session. Main Outcome Measure(s): The PedsQL consists of 2 summary scores (total, psychosocial) and 4 subscale scores (physical, emotional, social, school), with higher scores indicating better health-related quality of life (HRQOL). Groups were stratified by age (14, 15, or 16 years old). Independent-samples t tests were conducted to compare between-groups and sex differences. Results: The ATH group scored higher than the GEN group across all ages for total and psychosocial summary scores and for emotional and social functioning subscale scores (P ≤ .005). For physical functioning, scores of the 15-year-old ATH were higher than for their GEN counterparts (P = .001). Both 14- and 15-year-old ATH scored higher than their GEN counterparts for the school functioning subscale (P ≤ .013), but differences between 16-year olds were not significant (P = .228). Male adolescent athletes reported higher scores than female adolescent athletes across all scores (P ≤ .001) except for social functioning (P = .229). Conclusions: Adolescent athletes reported better HRQOL than GEN, particularly in emotional functioning. These findings further support the notion that ATH constitutes a unique population that requires its own set of normative values for self-reported, patient-rated outcome instruments.


2019 ◽  
Vol 404 (7) ◽  
pp. 807-814
Author(s):  
Lo Hallin Thompson ◽  
Erik Nordenström ◽  
Martin Almquist ◽  
Anders Bergenfelz

Abstract Purpose The aim of the study was to examine subjective health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in patients undergoing adrenalectomy. Methods The study included patients scheduled for adrenalectomy 2014–2017 after giving informed consent. The SF-36 questionnaire was administrated before operation and 1 year postoperatively. Results were compared with published normative values in Sweden. Results Some 50 patients were included. SF-36 scores for the whole cohort improved significantly after adrenalectomy in all dimensions except for bodily pain. Compared with the general Swedish population, the patients reported a significantly reduced HRQoL before and after adrenalectomy in all domains except for bodily pain postoperatively. Patients with benign functional tumours had lower HRQoL in physical domains before adrenalectomy than patients with benign non-functional tumours; Physical Component Summary (PCS), median 33.1 (range 17.1–62.9) vs. 44.2 (20.0–66.5), p = 0.018. Postoperatively, HRQoL was similar in the two groups of patients. Patients with benign functional tumours reported significantly improved HRQoL in all dimensions after adrenalectomy: PCS 33.1 (17.1–62.9) preoperatively vs. 47.6 (19.8-57.3) postoperatively, p = 0.005; Mental Component Summary (MCS) 33.8 (11.8–62.0) preoperatively vs. 52.7 (16.4–59.8) postoperatively, p = 0.004. These improvements were not seen in patients with benign non-functional or malignant tumours. Patients with malignant tumours reported no difference in SF-36 scores before or after adrenalectomy compared with patients with benign non-functional tumours. Conclusions Adrenalectomy improved HRQoL in patients with benign functional tumours. Adrenalectomy did not improve HRQoL in patients with benign non-functional tumours or in patients with malignant tumours.


2017 ◽  
Vol 11 (6) ◽  
pp. 959-967 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shin Oe ◽  
Daisuke Togawa ◽  
Go Yoshida ◽  
Tomohiko Hasegawa ◽  
Yu Yamato ◽  
...  

<sec><title>Study Design</title><p>Large cohort study.</p></sec><sec><title>Purpose</title><p>To clarify spinal sagittal alignment and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) according to sex in volunteers aged &gt;50 years with cervical deformity (CD).</p></sec><sec><title>Overview of Literature</title><p>Adult spinal deformities, especially those associated with lumbosacral lesions, are more frequent in females; however, CD is observed to a greater extent in males.</p></sec><sec><title>Methods</title><p>We divided 656 volunteers (263 males, 393 females; age, 50–89 years [mean, 73 years]) as follows: males with CD (CDM; 82 patients); males without CD (NCDM, 181); females with CD (CDF, 36); and females without CD (NCDF, 357). CD was defined as C2–7 sagittal vertical axis (SVA) ≥40 mm. We measured pelvic tilt (PT), pelvic incidence minus lumbar lordosis (PI−LL), thoracic kyphosis, T1 slope, cervical lordosis, C7 SVA, and C2–7 SVA. HRQOL was evaluated using EuroQOL five dimensions questionnaire (EQ-5D).</p></sec><sec><title>Results</title><p>In CDM, NCDM, CDF, and NCDF groups, the respective parameters were as follows: PT: 15°, 14°, 26°, and 21°; PI−LL: 7°, 5°, 16°, and 10°; C2–7 SVA: 49, 24, 46, and 20 mm; C7 SVA: 61, 40, 75, and 47 mm; and EQ-5D: 0.82, 0.88, 0.78, and 0.81. PT and PI−LL were significantly greater in the CDF group than in the NCDF group (<italic>p</italic>&lt;0.05) but were not significantly different between CDM and NCDM groups. The CDF group already showed deterioration of spinopelvic alignment, although it was maintained in the CDM group. EQ-5D in showed significantly greater deterioration the CDM group than in the NCDM group; deterioration of lumbopelvic parameters had less influence in males (<italic>p</italic>&lt;0.05).</p></sec><sec><title>Conclusions</title><p>Sagittal spinal deformity may have different mechanisms in males and females. The deterioration of spinal sagittal alignment in males may originate from the cervical spine, and CD may be associated with HRQOL.</p></sec>


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document