Peripheral nerve stimulation registry for intractable migraine headache (RELIEF): a real-life perspective on the utility of occipital nerve stimulation for chronic migraine

2020 ◽  
Vol 162 (12) ◽  
pp. 3201-3211 ◽  
Author(s):  
Keyoumars Ashkan ◽  
Giannis Sokratous ◽  
Hartmut Göbel ◽  
Vivek Mehta ◽  
Astrid Gendolla ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
pp. 193-197
Author(s):  
Roshina Khan

Background: Herpes zoster infection and subsequent postherpetic neuralgia can cause chronic neuropathic pain. Patients who do not respond well to pharmacotherapy require therapeutic options that are typically more invasive; our goal was to minimize invasiveness. Case Presentation: We present a case of intractable postherpetic neuralgia refractory to conservative pharmacological treatment and multiple occipital nerve blocks, which was successfully treated using peripheral occipital nerve stimulation (ONS) with an external implantable pulse generator (IPG). Conclusion: For interventionalists, one of the technical difficulties during ONS placement involves tunneling leads through the high-risk and difficult anatomy of the posterior neck. Further complicating placement and increasing patient discomfort are the long leads required for internal IPG implantation. The most commonly cited complication is lead migration or lead breakage. This difficulty can be attenuated by using an external IPG, such as was used in this case. An external IPG makes the ONS procedure significantly less invasive and reduces trauma and discomfort for the patient. Key words: Peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS), occipital nerve, postherpetic neuralgia (PHN), occipital nerve stimulation (ONS), implantable pulse generator (IPG), external IPG


Cephalalgia ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 31 (3) ◽  
pp. 271-285 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joel R Saper ◽  
David W Dodick ◽  
Stephen D Silberstein ◽  
Sally McCarville ◽  
Mark Sun ◽  
...  

Background: Medically intractable chronic migraine (CM) is a disabling illness characterized by headache ≥15 days per month. Methods: A multicenter, randomized, blinded, controlled feasibility study was conducted to obtain preliminary safety and efficacy data on occipital nerve stimulation (ONS) in CM. Eligible subjects received an occipital nerve block, and responders were randomized to adjustable stimulation (AS), preset stimulation (PS) or medical management (MM) groups. Results: Seventy-five of 110 subjects were assigned to a treatment group; complete diary data were available for 66. A responder was defined as a subject who achieved a 50% or greater reduction in number of headache days per month or a three-point or greater reduction in average overall pain intensity compared with baseline. Three-month responder rates were 39% for AS, 6% for PS and 0% for MM. No unanticipated adverse device events occurred. Lead migration occurred in 12 of 51 (24%) subjects. Conclusion: The results of this feasibility study offer promise and should prompt further controlled studies of ONS in CM.


2019 ◽  
pp. 157-162
Author(s):  
Cletus Cheyuo ◽  
Roy S. Hwang ◽  
Julie G. Pilitsis

Chronic migraine remains disabling for a significant proportion of the population and challenging for medical providers. In addition to pharmacological treatment, peripheral nerve stimulation has been shown to provide satisfactory pain relief and improved quality of life. In this chapter, an illustrative case of occipital nerve stimulation (ONS) for refractory chronic migraine is presented, including the preoperative assessment and planning, decision making process, detailed surgical technique, aftercare and follow-up. A complication and its management are also described and discussed in detail and supplemented with clinical pearls. This discussion is accompanied by a review of the relevant evidence and outcomes from the literature.


2019 ◽  
Vol 22 (5) ◽  
pp. 638-644 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rodrigo Garcia‐Ortega ◽  
Tamara Edwards ◽  
Liz Moir ◽  
Tipu Z. Aziz ◽  
Alexander L. Green ◽  
...  

PLoS ONE ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. e0116786 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yen-Fu Chen ◽  
George Bramley ◽  
Gemma Unwin ◽  
Dalvina Hanu-Cernat ◽  
Janine Dretzke ◽  
...  

Cephalalgia ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 35 (4) ◽  
pp. 359-362 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas M Kinfe ◽  
Patrick Schuss ◽  
Hartmut Vatter

Background Occipital nerve stimulation (ONS) results in beneficial outcomes, with marked pain relief, in otherwise intractable chronic migraine (CM) and chronic cluster headache (CCH). Some studies have reported that a positive response to occipital nerve block (ONB) administered prior to ONS predicts a positive response to ONS. However, other studies concerned with proper patient selection claimed no predictive value for ONB. The aim of this study was to re-evaluate the usefulness and predictive value of ONB prior to ONS. Methods Literature searches on the predictive value of ONB were performed in MEDLINE and PubMed. Patient data were extracted and a pooled analysis was performed. Results The literature review revealed 133 patients with CM and seven patients with CCH who received preoperative ONB. To date, a randomized controlled study examining the relationship between ONB and ONS has not been conducted in patients with CM. Conclusions Current literature suggests that ONB does not sufficiently predict ONS responsiveness in patients with refractory CM and CCH; this important issue requires further investigation.


2011 ◽  
Vol 1;14 (1;1) ◽  
pp. 37-44
Author(s):  
Kevin L . Wininger

Background: Evidence of a paradigm shift towards epicranial neurostimulation treatment techniques aimed at the site of headache pain is beginning to populate the literature. This is most apparent by 2 recently published reports describing alternative approaches to peripheral nerve stimulation techniques for refractory migraine, including hemiplegic migraine. Objectives: To contribute to the emerging literature on epicranial-based neuroaugmentative approaches which target site-specific areas of distinct, but relatively diffuse, headache pain. Specifically, we describe the feasibility of a novel neurostimulation technique: occipital nerve stimulation, com­bined with bilateral subcutaneous electrical stimulation over the temporal region, to treat a patient dually diagnosed with “compli­cated migraine” and occipital neuralgia. Integral to this report, key stimulation programming data are also presented to better distinguish the role of this form of therapy in migraine, or other headache forms, from both the clinical and biomedical perspectives. Methods: Case presentation with literature review. Results: At 24-month follow-up, headache onset had been reduced by more than 50%, including cessation of neurologic deficits that accompanied the patient’s migraines. No complications or adverse side effects are reported. The programming data reported here supports a proposed mechanism of action concerning stimulation of the auriculotemporal nerve distribution/anterior temporal region for management of refractory pain in migraine. Limitations: Case presentation provides only initial assessment of treatment safety, not conclusive evidence of treatment effectiveness. Future studies which consider “followthe-path” epicranial approaches to peripheral nerve stimulation techniques for refractory headache pain are needed to better quantify outcomes and mechanisms of action. Conclusions: In the single case reported here, the feasibility of a novel neurostimulation technique (occipital nerve stimulation/bilateral subcutaneous temporal region stimulation) to treat headache is presented. At the 24-month follow-up, no complications (such as loss of coverage due to lead displacement or lead fracture or erosion) or adverse side effects were reported. Finally, inclusion of fundamental programming data in reports on neuroaugmentative approaches to headache care will complement initiatives in research from the clinical and biomedical communities involved in this field. Key words: Epicranial neurostimulation technique, peripheral nerve stimulation, stimulation parameters, complicated migraine, occipital neuralgia.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document