scholarly journals Motivational learning biases are differentially modulated by genetic determinants of striatal and prefrontal dopamine function

Author(s):  
Anni Richter ◽  
Lieke de Boer ◽  
Marc Guitart-Masip ◽  
Gusalija Behnisch ◽  
Constanze I. Seidenbecher ◽  
...  

AbstractDopaminergic neurotransmission plays a pivotal role in appetitively motivated behavior in mammals, including humans. Notably, action and valence are not independent in motivated tasks, and it is particularly difficult for humans to learn the inhibition of an action to obtain a reward. We have previously observed that the carriers of the DRD2/ANKK1 TaqIA A1 allele, that has been associated with reduced striatal dopamine D2 receptor expression, showed a diminished learning performance when required to learn response inhibition to obtain rewards, a finding that was replicated in two independent cohorts. With our present study, we followed two aims: first, we aimed to replicate our finding on the DRD2/ANKK1 TaqIA polymorphism in a third independent cohort (N = 99) and to investigate the nature of the genetic effects more closely using trial-by-trial behavioral analysis and computational modeling in the combined dataset (N = 281). Second, we aimed to assess a potentially modulatory role of prefrontal dopamine availability, using the widely studied COMT Val108/158Met polymorphism as a proxy. We first report a replication of the above mentioned finding. Interestingly, after combining all three cohorts, exploratory analyses regarding the COMT Val108/158Met polymorphism suggest that homozygotes for the Met allele, which has been linked to higher prefrontal dopaminergic tone, show a lower learning bias. Our results corroborate the importance of genetic variability of the dopaminergic system in individual learning differences of action–valence interaction and, furthermore, suggest that motivational learning biases are differentially modulated by genetic determinants of striatal and prefrontal dopamine function.

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anni Richter ◽  
Lieke de Boer ◽  
Marc Guitart-Masip ◽  
Gusalija Behnisch ◽  
Constanze I. Seidenbecher ◽  
...  

Dopaminergic neurotransmission plays a pivotal role in appetitively motivated behavior in mammals, including humans. Notably, action and valence are not independent in motivated tasks, and it is particularly difficult for humans to learn the inhibition of an action to obtain a reward. We have previously observed that the carriers of the DRD2/ANKK1 TaqIA A1 allele, that has been associated with reduced striatal dopamine D2 receptor expression, showed a diminished learning performance when required to learn response inhibition to obtain rewards, a finding that was replicated in two independent cohorts. In the present study, we first report a replication of this finding in a third independent cohort of 99 participants. Interestingly, after combining all three cohorts (total N = 281), exploratory analyses regarding the COMT Val108/158Met polymorphism suggest that homozygotes for the Met allele, which has been linked to higher prefrontal dopaminergic tone, show a lower learning bias. Our results corroborate the importance of genetic variability of the dopaminergic system in individual learning differences of action-valence interaction and, furthermore, suggest that motivational learning biases are differentially modulated by genetic determinants of striatal and prefrontal dopamine function.


2005 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 361-395 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew James Smith ◽  
Suzanna Becker ◽  
Shitij Kapur

The functional role of dopamine has attracted a great deal of interest ever since it was empirically discovered that dopamine-blocking drugs could be used to treat psychosis. Specifically, the D2 receptor and its expression in the ventral striatum have emerged as pivotal in our understanding of the complex role of the neuromodulator in schizophrenia, reward, and motivation. Our departure from the ubiquitous temporal difference (TD) model of dopamine neuron firing allows us to account for a range of experimental evidence suggesting that ventral striatal dopamine D2 receptor manipulation selectively modulates motivated behavior for distal versus proximal outcomes. Whether an internal model or the TD approach (or a mixture) is better suited to a comprehensive exposition of tonic and phasic dopamine will have important implications for our understanding of reward, motivation, schizophrenia, and impulsivity. We also use the model to help unite some of the leading cognitive hypotheses of dopamine function under a computational umbrella. We have used the model ourselves to stimulate and focus new rounds of experimental research.


2006 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
pp. 88
Author(s):  
Sa Yong Kim ◽  
Kyu seok Kim ◽  
Seung Woo Shin ◽  
Min Sun Kim ◽  
Ja Hyun Baik

Endocrine ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 57 (2) ◽  
pp. 314-325 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rosario Pivonello ◽  
Marlijn Waaijers ◽  
Johan M. Kros ◽  
Claudia Pivonello ◽  
Cristina de Angelis ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Anni Richter ◽  
Marc Guitart-Masip ◽  
Adriana Barman ◽  
Catherine Libeau ◽  
Gusalija Behnisch ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mi-Hyun Choi ◽  
Ji Eun Na ◽  
Ye Ran Yoon ◽  
Hyo Jin Lee ◽  
Sehyoun Yoon ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Isabel Espadas ◽  
Oscar Ortiz ◽  
Patricia García-Sanz ◽  
Adrián Sanz-Magro ◽  
Samuel Alberquilla ◽  
...  

Abstract Dopamine receptors play an important role in motivational, emotional, and motor responses. In addition, growing evidence suggests a key role of hippocampal dopamine receptors in learning and memory. It is well known that associative learning and synaptic plasticity of CA3-CA1 requires the dopamine D1 receptor (D1R). However, the specific role of the dopamine D2 receptor (D2R) on memory-related neuroplasticity processes is still undefined. Here, by using two models of D2R loss, D2R knockout mice (Drd2−/−) and mice with intrahippocampal injections of Drd2-small interfering RNA (Drd2-siRNA), we aimed to investigate how D2R is involved in learning and memory as well as in long-term potentiation of the hippocampus. Our studies revealed that the genetic inactivation of D2R impaired the spatial memory, associative learning, and the classical conditioning of eyelid responses. Similarly, deletion of D2R reduced the activity-dependent synaptic plasticity in the hippocampal CA1-CA3 synapse. Our results demonstrate the first direct evidence that D2R is essential in behaving mice for trace eye blink conditioning and associated changes in hippocampal synaptic strength. Taken together, these results indicate a key role of D2R in regulating hippocampal plasticity changes and, in consequence, acquisition and consolidation of spatial and associative forms of memory.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document