scholarly journals Effectiveness of different fiber post removal techniques and their influence on dentinal microcrack formation

Author(s):  
Franziska Haupt ◽  
Insa Riggers ◽  
Frank Konietschke ◽  
Tina Rödig

Abstract Objectives The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of different fiber post removal techniques and to correlate dentinal loss with microcrack formation. Materials and methods Forty-five extracted single-rooted teeth were root canal treated and fiber posts were adhesively luted. Specimens were divided into three groups (n = 15) according to the removal technique: long-shaft round bur (EndoTracer #08, Komet, Lemgo, Germany), SonicFlex Endo (KaVo, Biberach, Germany), DT Post Removal Kit (VDW, Munich, Germany). Roots were scanned before post cementation and after post removal using micro-computed tomography. Dentin loss, residual luting material, working time, and the induction of microcracks were assessed. Statistical analysis was performed by using multiple contrast tests (max-t tests, α = 0.05). Correlations between parameters dentin loss/new microcracks and dentin loss/residual material were calculated using Kendall’s tau. Results Post removal with SonicFlex Endo resulted in the highest amount of removed dentin with significant differences to the round bur and the DT Post Removal Kit. No technique was found to completely remove the post and luting material. All techniques induced microcracks with the DT Post Removal Kit presenting the highest number of new defects. No correlation between dentin loss and new microcracks was observed. Deviations from the original root canal occurred in all groups, but no perforation was observed. Conclusions All techniques resulted in dentin loss, residual luting material, and the formation of microcracks. However, no correlation between dentin loss and the induction of microcracks was observed. Clinical relevance As all techniques resulted in microcrack formation and dentin loss, this study emphasizes the risk of iatrogenic damage due to post removal procedures.

2018 ◽  
Vol 32 (suppl 1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Manoel Damião de Sousa-Neto ◽  
Yara Correa Silva-Sousa ◽  
Jardel Francisco Mazzi-Chaves ◽  
Kleber Kildare Teodoro Carvalho ◽  
Ana Flávia Simões Barbosa ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 19 (4) ◽  
pp. 859-866 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marco Aurélio Versiani ◽  
Gustavo De-Deus ◽  
Jorge Vera ◽  
Erick Souza ◽  
Liviu Steier ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 22 (9) ◽  
pp. 3189-3194 ◽  
Author(s):  
Camila Galletti Espir ◽  
Camila Almeida Nascimento-Mendes ◽  
Juliane Maria Guerreiro-Tanomaru ◽  
Bruno Cavalini Cavenago ◽  
Marco Antonio Hungaro Duarte ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 39 (8) ◽  
pp. 1067-1070 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan P. Robinson ◽  
Philip J. Lumley ◽  
Paul R. Cooper ◽  
Liam M. Grover ◽  
A. Damien Walmsley

2019 ◽  
Vol 31 (2) ◽  
pp. 236-241
Author(s):  
Aws ArRejaie ◽  
Saleh A. Alsuliman ◽  
Mohammed O. Aljohani ◽  
Hesham A. Altamimi ◽  
Emad Alshwaimi ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 42 (4) ◽  
pp. 610-614 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas Gerhard Wolf ◽  
Frank Paqué ◽  
Maximilian Zeller ◽  
Brita Willershausen ◽  
Benjamín Briseño-Marroquín

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document