Vagus nerve stimulation in drug-resistant epilepsy: the efficacy and adverse effects in a 5-year follow-up study in Iran

2016 ◽  
Vol 37 (11) ◽  
pp. 1773-1778 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hossein Pakdaman ◽  
Ali Amini Harandi ◽  
Mehdi Abbasi ◽  
Mohammad Karimi ◽  
Mohammad Ali Arami ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Junya Hirashima ◽  
Miyoko Saito ◽  
Hirotaka Igarashi ◽  
Satoshi Takagi ◽  
Daisuke Hasegawa

A vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) system was surgically implanted to treat drug-resistant epilepsy in a 5-year-old male Shetland Sheepdog. At regular visits during a 1-year follow-up, treatment efficacy and adverse effects were assessed, and programmable stimulation parameters were adjusted to optimize stimulation intensity while avoiding adverse effects. The frequency of generalized tonic–clonic seizures was reduced by 87% after the initiation of VNS. The owner reported that the dog regained his personality, and the quality of life of both the dog and owner improved. The only adverse effect of VNS was a cough that was controlled by adjusting stimulation parameters. There were no surgical complications or other issues with the VNS device. This is the first long-term evaluation of VNS therapy in a dog, and the results obtained suggest that gradual adjustments of VNS parameters facilitate optimum VNS dosing.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hongyun Liu ◽  
Ping Zhan ◽  
Fangang Meng ◽  
Weidong Wang

Abstract Background Cervical vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) has been widely accepted as adjunctive therapy for drug-resistant epilepsy and major depression. Its effects on glycemic control in humans were however poorly understood. The aim of our study was to investigate the potential effects of VNS on fasting blood glucose (FBG) in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy. Methods Patients with drug-resistant epilepsy who had received VNS implants at the same hospital were retrospectively studied. Effects on FBG, weight, body mass index and blood pressure were evaluated at 4, 8 and 12 months of follow-up. Results 32 subjects (11 females/21males, 19±9 years, body mass index 22.2±4.0 kg/m 2 ) completed 12-month follow-up. At the 4 months, there were no significant changes in FBG concentrations from baseline to follow-up in both Sham-VNS (4.89±0.54 vs. 4.56±0.54 mmol/L, N=13, p=0.101) and VNS (4.80±0.54 vs. 4.50±0.56 mmol/L, N=19, p=0.117) groups. However, after 8 (4.90±0.42 mmol/L, N=32, p=0.001) and 12 (4.86±0.40 mmol/L, N=32, p=0.002) months of VNS, FBG levels significantly increased compared to baseline values (4.52±0.54 mmol/L, N=32). Changes in FBG concentrations at both 8 (R 2 =0.502, N=32, p<0.001) and 12 (R 2 =0.572, N=32, p<0.001) months were negatively correlated with baseline FBG levels. Conclusions Our study suggests that chronic cervical VNS elevates FBG levels with commonly used stimulation parameters in patients with epilepsy.


2019 ◽  
Vol 20 (3) ◽  
pp. 189-198 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura Pérez-Carbonell ◽  
Howard Faulkner ◽  
Sean Higgins ◽  
Michalis Koutroumanidis ◽  
Guy Leschziner

Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) is a neuromodulatory therapeutic option for drug-resistant epilepsy. In randomised controlled trials, VNS implantation has resulted in over 50% reduction in seizure frequency in 26%–40% of patients within 1 year. Long-term uncontrolled studies suggest better responses to VNS over time; however, the assessment of other potential predictive factors has led to contradictory results. Although initially designed for managing focal seizures, its use has been extended to other forms of drug-resistant epilepsy. In this review, we discuss the evidence supporting the use of VNS, its impact on seizure frequency and quality of life, and common adverse effects of this therapy. We also include practical guidance for the approach to and the management of patients with VNS in situ.


Author(s):  
Jaylynn Arcand ◽  
Karen Waterhouse ◽  
Lizbeth Hernandez-Ronquillo ◽  
Aleksander Vitali ◽  
Jose F. Tellez-Zenteno

AbstractBackground: Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) therapy has been widely recognized as an alternative for the treatment of drug-resistant epilepsy, although modification of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) during VNS treatment could explain the improvement in patients. Methods: We retrospectively assessed the efficacy of VNS in 30 adult patients with epilepsy treated with >6 months of follow-up. The criteria for implantation were the following: (1) not a candidate for resective epilepsy surgery, (2) drug-resistant epilepsy, (3) impairment of quality of life, (4) no other option of treatment, and (5) patients with idiopathic generalized epilepsy who fail to be controlled with appropriate AEDs. We assessed sociodemographics, seizure etiology, seizure classification, and AEDs used during treatment with VNS. We assessed adverse effects and efficacy. Responder rate was defined as >50% seizure improvement from baseline. Results: Thirty patients (females, 18; males, 12; age, 35.1±13.3 years) were included. After 6, 12, 24, and 36 months of follow-up, the response rates were: 13/30 (43%), 13/27 (48%), 9/22 (41%), and 8/16 (50%), respectively; none was seizure free. Fifty-seven percent, 33%, 59%, and 81% of patients had changes of medication type or dose at 6, 12, 24, and 36 months respectively. In the majority of patients, the change of medication consisted of an increase in the dose of AEDs. Conclusions: Our study shows that VNS is an effective therapy, although significant changes in medications were done along with the therapy; therefore, the real effect of VNS could be controversial.


2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 138-148
Author(s):  
Xiaoya Qin

Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) is a neuromodulation therapy increasingly used for treating drug-resistant epilepsy. However, it remains to be determined which patients are best suited for the treatment, and it is difficult to predict the therapeutic effect before the implantation. Mutations in some genes could lead to epilepsy. Here we report two cases of pediatric patients with drug-resistant epilepsy treated by VNS therapy: Patient 1 with ARX mutation achieved good outcomes; Patient 2 with the CDKL5 mutation did not show improvement. Additionally, the therapeutic impact of VNS on brain networks was investigated, hoping to provide some empirical evidence for a better understanding of the mechanism of VNS treatment.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document