scholarly journals Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status (TICS): Italian adaptation, psychometrics and diagnostics

Author(s):  
Edoardo Nicolò Aiello ◽  
Antonella Esposito ◽  
Ilaria Giannone ◽  
Lorenzo Diana ◽  
Ildebrando Appollonio ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Marcel S Woo ◽  
Jakob Malsy ◽  
Jana Pöttgen ◽  
Susan Seddiq Zai ◽  
Friederike Ufer ◽  
...  

Abstract Neuropsychiatric complications associated with coronavirus disease 2019 caused by the Coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) are increasingly appreciated. While most studies have focussed on severely affected individuals during acute infection, it remains unclear whether mild COVID-19 results in neurocognitive deficits in young patients. Here, we established a screening approach to detect cognitive deficiencies in post-COVID-19 patients. In this cross-sectional study, we recruited 18 mostly young patients 20–105 days (median, 85 days) after recovery from mild to moderate disease who visited our outpatient clinic for post-COVID-19 care. Notably, 14 (78%) patients reported sustained mild cognitive deficits and performed worse in the Modified Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status screening test for mild cognitive impairment compared to 10 age-matched healthy controls. While short-term memory, attention and concentration were particularly affected by COVID-19, screening results did not correlate with hospitalization, treatment, viremia or acute inflammation. Additionally, Modified Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status scores did not correlate with depressed mood or fatigue. In two severely affected patients, we excluded structural or other inflammatory causes by magnetic resonance imaging, serum and cerebrospinal fluid analyses. Together, our results demonstrate that sustained sub-clinical cognitive impairments might be a common complication after recovery from COVID-19 in young adults, regardless of clinical course that were unmasked by our diagnostic approach.


2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (6) ◽  
pp. 2935
Author(s):  
Ni Made Gitaria Sylvana Ratmadewi ◽  
Rudy Dwi Laksono ◽  
Laura Bianca Sylvia Huwae

Pasien yang sembuh dari Covid-19 memiliki beberapa keluhan pada daya ingat. Virus corona dapat menembus ke SSP (Sistem Saraf Pusat) dan cairan serebrospinal dalam waktu kurang dari seminggu. Pemeriksaan histopatologi otak pasien Covid-19 yang meninggal menunjukkan potensi SARS-CoV-2 menginfeksi ke sistem saraf pusat (SSP). Neuro inflamasi juga dapat merusak BBB (Blood Brain Barier). Setelah BBB terganggu, sitokin dapat masuk ke SSP dan menyebabkan aktivasi mikroglial dan stres oksidatif, yang menyebabkan gangguan kognitif. Metode Penelitian dilakukan secara cross sectional random sampling terhadap pasien di Ruang Isolasi Covid-19 Rumah Sakit Tingkat II. Prof. dr. J.A Latumeten Ambon selama periode Maret 2020 sampai dengan Maret 2021 dengan melakukan wawancara menggunakan Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status-M (TICS-M) yang terdiri dari 22 pertanyaan dengan total nilai 50. Dari 167 pasien, terdapat 54 pasien yang bersedia di wawancara dan terdapat 28 pasien yang memiliki kecenderungan gangguan cognitive ringan dengan rentang usia 31-40 tahun. Penelitian ini menemukan bahwa nilai TICS-M pada pasien pasca Covid-19 berhubungan dengan usia, namun tidak berhubungan dengan jenis kelamin dan lamanya pendidikan.


2019 ◽  
Vol 33 (5) ◽  
pp. 415-420 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mariana Muñoz-García ◽  
Sebastián Cervantes ◽  
Cristina Razquin ◽  
Francisco Guillén-Grima ◽  
Juan B. Toledo ◽  
...  

2006 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 104-109 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roy Yaari ◽  
Adam S. Fleisher ◽  
Anthony C. Gamst ◽  
Victor P. Bagwell ◽  
Leon J. Thal

Neurosurgery ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 59 (4) ◽  
pp. 803-811 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph T. King ◽  
Michael L. DiLuna ◽  
Domenic V. Cicchetti ◽  
Joel Tsevat ◽  
Mark S. Roberts

Abstract BACKGROUND: Clinicians and researchers use brief instruments, such as the Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) and the Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status (TICS), to measure cognitive functioning in patients with cerebral aneurysms. MMSE and TICS scores are often dichotomized to classify patients as cognitively impaired or not. Frequently, after an initial MMSE face-to-face evaluation, the TICS is used for follow-up assessments by telephone. METHODS: A cross-sectional cohort of patients with cerebral aneurysms completed the MMSE at baseline and the MMSE or TICS at the 12-month follow-up examination. Multivariate logistic regression adjusting for demographics was used to model cognitive impairment. MMSE and TICS results were compared using the MMSE as the “gold standard.” RESULTS: Eleven out of 171 (6%) patients had baseline MMSE scores less than 24, indicating cognitive impairment. Multivariate analysis showed that a history of subarachnoid hemorrhage was associated with cognitive impairment measured with the MMSE (odds ratio, 13.9; P = 0.021; C statistic = 0.87); there was no relationship between subarachnoid hemorrhage or treatment and TICS cognitive impairment (i.e., score < 27). In patients without recent or interim invasive interventions that might affect cognition (n = 65), raw baseline MMSE and 12-month TICS scores had fair correlations (r = 0.30, P = 0.015); however, dichotomized scores had poor agreement, and TICS sensitivity and positive predictive value was 0% compared with the MMSE. CONCLUSION: The MMSE may be more sensitive than the TICS to the effects of subarachnoid hemorrhage on cognitive functioning. Raw MMSE and TICS scores are well correlated, but dichotomized MMSE and TICS scores are probably not interchangeable in this patient population.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document