Efficacy of interventions to improve hand hygiene compliance in neonatal units: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2015 ◽  
Vol 34 (5) ◽  
pp. 887-897 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. Ofek Shlomai ◽  
S. Rao ◽  
S. Patole
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Hand Hygiene ◽  
Hand Hygiene Compliance ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Improve Hand Hygiene ◽  
Hygiene Compliance

scholarly journals A Systematic Review on the Effectiveness of Interventions to Improve Hand Hygiene Compliance of Nurses in the Hospital Setting

2017 ◽  
Vol 49 (2) ◽  
pp. 143-152 ◽  
Author(s):  
Olena Doronina RN ◽  
Denise Jones ◽  
Marianna Martello ◽  
Alain Biron ◽  
Mélanie Lavoie-Tremblay
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Hand Hygiene ◽  
Hand Hygiene Compliance ◽  
Hospital Setting ◽  
Improve Hand Hygiene ◽  
Hygiene Compliance

scholarly journals Hand Hygiene Compliance and Associated Factors among Healthcare Workers in Ethiopia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-10
Author(s):  
Negasa Eshete Soboksa ◽  
Belay Negassa ◽  
GirumGebremeskel Kanno ◽  
Zemachu Ashuro ◽  
DinkineshBegna Gudeta
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Hand Hygiene ◽  
Healthcare Workers ◽  
Associated Factors ◽  
Hand Hygiene Compliance ◽  
Positive Attitude ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Tissue Paper ◽  
Hygiene Promotion ◽  
Hygiene Compliance

Background. Promoting hand hygiene compliance should be a priority for health authorities and all healthcare facilities at all levels. Therefore, this systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to provide a pooled estimate of hand hygiene compliance and associated factors among healthcare professionals in Ethiopia. Methods. PubMed, Science Direct, EMBASE, the Google search engine, and Google Scholar were used to retrieve studies that were eligible for the study. The searches included all studies published in English prior to July 2021. Using a structured data extraction format, two authors independently extracted the required data. STATA Version 16 software has been used for statistical analysis. To measure the heterogeneity of the studies, the Cochrane Q-test statistics and I2 test were used. Because of the significant heterogeneity, a random-effects model was used. Results. The pooled hand hygiene compliance among healthcare workers in Ethiopia was 38% (95% CI: 0.16–0.59). According to the study’s subgroup analysis, Addis Ababa City administration health workers had the highest hand hygiene compliance, at 73% (95% CI: 0.50–0.96), while SNNP regional state had the lowest, at 9% (95% CI: 0.05–0.13). Presence of hand hygiene promotion (OR: 2.14, 95% CI: 1.04–3.24), towel/tissue paper availability (OR: 3.97, 95% CI: 2.09–5.86), having a positive attitude toward hand hygiene (OR: 1.79, 95% CI: 1.28–2.30), having good knowledge about hand hygiene (OR: 3.45, 95% CI: 1.26–5.64), and being trained for hand hygiene (OR:4.97, 95% CI:1.81–8.14) were significantly associated with hand hygiene compliance. Conclusion. In this analysis, hand hygiene compliance among healthcare workers in Ethiopia was less than half. Providing hand hygiene promotion, towel/tissue paper presence, having a positive attitude toward hand hygiene, having good knowledge about hand hygiene, and being trained for hand hygiene were important variables for the increment of hand hygiene compliance.

scholarly journals The Effectiveness of Interventions in Improving Hand Hygiene Compliance: A Meta-Analysis and Logic Model

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-11
Author(s):  
Mohammad Hossein Kaveh ◽  
Mohadeseh Motamed-Jahromi ◽  
Soheil Hassanipour
Keyword(s):  
Hand Hygiene ◽  
Healthcare Workers ◽  
Hand Hygiene Compliance ◽  
Randomized Clinical Trials ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Logic Model ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Improve Hand Hygiene ◽  
Effective Interventions ◽  
Hygiene Compliance

Background. Despite the availability of various guidelines, rules, and strategies, hand hygiene adherence rates among healthcare workers are reported significantly lower than expected. The aim of this meta-analysis is to determine the most effective interventions to improve hand hygiene and to develop a logic model based on the characteristics of the most effective interventions. Methods. A literature search was conducted on PubMed, ProQuest, Web of Knowledge, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and ScienceDirect databases up to December 21, 2019, with no time limit. Randomized clinical trials which had designed interventions to improve hand hygiene were reviewed. Data were extracted independently by two authors. All statistical analyses were performed using Comprehensive Meta-Analysis (CMA) software (version 2.0). A random-effects model was used to estimate odds ratios. Results. Although 14 studies were initially reviewed, only 12 studies entered the meta-analysis, since they had identified percentage rates of hand hygiene compliance. The most effective intervention (odds ratio 18.4, 95% CI (13.6–24.8)) was a multilevel strategy that influenced the determinants of hand hygiene behavior at individual, interpersonal, and organizational levels. Following this, a theory-driven logic model was mapped out to promote hand hygiene, based on situational analysis. Conclusion. This study suggests that designing integrated interventions based on a multilevel socioecological approach has the greatest potential to improve hand hygiene compliance in healthcare workers. The logical model proposed in this study can thus provide a useful guide for designing and conducting future experimental research.

scholarly journals Interventions to improve hand hygiene compliance in emergency departments: a systematic review

2019 ◽  
Vol 102 (4) ◽  
pp. 394-406 ◽  
Author(s):  
H-J. Seo ◽  
K-Y. Sohng ◽  
S.O. Chang ◽  
S.K. Chaung ◽  
J.S. Won ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Hand Hygiene ◽  
Emergency Departments ◽  
Hand Hygiene Compliance ◽  
Improve Hand Hygiene ◽  
Hygiene Compliance

scholarly journals Intervenciones para mejorar el grado de cumplimiento de la higiene de manos en los servicios de urgencias

2020 ◽  
Vol 23 (4) ◽  
pp. 462-466
Author(s):  
Pablo Chico Sánchez ◽  
María del Mar Seguí Crespo
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Hand Hygiene ◽  
Emergency Departments ◽  
Hand Hygiene Compliance ◽  
Hospital Infection ◽  
Review Journal ◽  
Improve Hand Hygiene ◽  
Hygiene Compliance

Este trabajo es un comentario del artículo: Seo HJ, Sohng KY, Chang SO, Chaung SK, Wone JS, Choi MJ. Interventions to improve hand hygiene compliance in emergency departments: a systematic review. Journal of Hospital Infection. 2019;102(4):394-406. doi:10.1016/j.jhin.2019.03.013

scholarly journals Improving hand hygiene in hospitals: comparing the effect of a nudge and a boost on protocol compliance

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-23
Author(s):  
Henrico van Roekel ◽  
Joanne Reinhard ◽  
Stephan Grimmelikhuijsen
Keyword(s):  
Hand Hygiene ◽  
Behavioral Interventions ◽  
Hand Hygiene Compliance ◽  
Hospital Nurses ◽  
Improve Hand Hygiene ◽  
Policy Practice ◽  
Effective Interventions ◽  
Risk Literacy ◽  
Hygiene Compliance ◽  
Hospital Wards

Abstract Nudging has become a well-known policy practice. Recently, ‘boosting’ has been suggested as an alternative to nudging. In contrast to nudges, boosts aim to empower individuals to exert their own agency to make decisions. This article is one of the first to compare a nudging and a boosting intervention, and it does so in a critical field setting: hand hygiene compliance of hospital nurses. During a 4-week quasi-experiment, we tested the effect of a reframing nudge and a risk literacy boost on hand hygiene compliance in three hospital wards. The results show that nudging and boosting were both effective interventions to improve hand hygiene compliance. A tentative finding is that, while the nudge had a stronger immediate effect, the boost effect remained stable for a week, even after the removal of the intervention. We conclude that, besides nudging, researchers and policymakers may consider boosting when they seek to implement or test behavioral interventions in domains such as healthcare.

scholarly journals Access to Alcohol-Based Hand Rub Is Associated With Improved Hand Hygiene in an Ebola-Threatened District of Western Uganda

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (S1) ◽  
pp. s457-s457
Author(s):  
Mohammed Lamorde ◽  
Matthew Lozier ◽  
Maureen Kesande ◽  
Patricia Akers ◽  
Olive Tumuhairwe ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hand Hygiene ◽  
Healthcare Workers ◽  
Hand Hygiene Compliance ◽  
Wide Distribution ◽  
Patient Contact ◽  
Improve Hand Hygiene ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Hygiene Compliance ◽  
Handwashing With Soap

Background: Ebola virus disease (EVD) is highly transmissible and has a high mortality rate. During outbreaks, EVD can spread across international borders. Inadequate hand hygiene places healthcare workers (HCWs) at increased risk for healthcare-associated infections, including EVD. In high-income countries, alcohol-based hand rub (ABHR) can improve hand hygiene compliance among HCWs in healthcare facilities (HCF). We evaluated local production and district-wide distribution of a WHO-recommended ABHR formulation and associations between ABHR availability in HCF and HCW hand hygiene compliance. Methods: The evaluation included 30 HCF in Kabarole District, located in Western Uganda near the border with the Democratic Republic of the Congo, where an EVD outbreak has been ongoing since August 2018. We recorded baseline hand hygiene practices before and after patient contact among 46 healthcare workers across 20 HCFs in August 2018. Subsequently, in late 2018, WHO/UNICEF distributed commercially produced ABHR to all 30 HCFs in Kabarole as part of Ebola preparedness efforts. In February 2019, our crossover evaluation distributed 20 L locally produced ABHR to each of 15 HCFs. From June 24–July 5, 2019, we performed follow-up observations of hand hygiene practices among 68 HCWs across all 30 HCFs. We defined hand hygiene as handwashing with soap or using ABHR. We conducted focus groups with healthcare workers at baseline and follow-up. Results: We observed hand hygiene compliance before and after 203 and 308 patient contacts at baseline and follow-up, respectively. From baseline to follow-up, hand hygiene compliance before patient contact increased for ABHR use (0% to 17%) and handwashing with soap (0% to 5%), for a total increase from 0% to 22% (P < .0001). Similarly, hand hygiene after patient contact increased from baseline to follow-up for ABHR use (from 3% to 55%), and handwashing with soap decreased (from 12% to 7%), yielding a net increase in hand hygiene compliance after patient contact from 15% to 62% (P < .0001). Focus groups found that HCWs prefer ABHR to handwashing because it is faster and more convenient. Conclusions: In an HCF in Kabarole District, the introduction of ABHR appeared to improve hand hygiene compliance. However, the confirmation of 3 EVD cases in Uganda 120 km from Kabarole District 2 weeks before our follow-up hand hygiene observations may have influenced healthcare worker behavior and hand hygiene compliance. Local production and district-wide distribution of ABHR is feasible and may contribute to improved hand hygiene compliance among healthcare workers.Funding: NoneDisclosures: Mohammed Lamorde, Contracted Research - Janssen Pharmaceutica, ViiV, Mylan

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document