The prophylactic use of endoscopic vacuum therapy for anastomotic dehiscence after rectal anterior resection: is it feasible for redo surgery?

Author(s):  
F. V. Mandarino ◽  
A. Barchi ◽  
P. Biamonte ◽  
D. Esposito ◽  
F. Azzolini ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Vol 52 ◽  
pp. S171
Author(s):  
S.M. Milluzzo ◽  
M. Lovera ◽  
P. Cesaro ◽  
N. Olivari ◽  
A. Bizzotto ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 91 (6) ◽  
pp. AB493
Author(s):  
Sebastian Manuel Milluzzo ◽  
Mauro Lovera ◽  
Paola Cesaro ◽  
Nicola Olivari ◽  
Alessandra Bizzotto ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
SM Milluzzo ◽  
M Lovera ◽  
P Cesaro ◽  
N Olivari ◽  
A Bizzotto ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
pp. 263177451986030 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leonard T. Walsh ◽  
Justin Loloi ◽  
Carl E. Manzo ◽  
Abraham Mathew ◽  
Jennifer Maranki ◽  
...  

Acute, high-grade esophageal perforation and postoperative leak after esophagogastrostomy are associated with high morbidity and mortality due to the development of mediastinitis and thoracic contamination. Endoscopic vacuum therapy has proven to be a feasible, safe therapy for management of esophageal wall defects, but with limited success. We describe a retrospective single-center analysis of two patients who underwent endoscopic vacuum therapy for significant esophageal disruptions with a median cross-sectional diameter of 10.7 cm. The technique involved the use of a standard upper video endoscope, nasogastric tube, and vacuum-assisted closure dressing kit, with endoscopic placement of a polyurethane sponge and nasogastric tube assembly into the mediastinal or thoracic cavity. Serial washout and debridement were performed prior to each sponge insertion. Data were collected on indication, size of the cavities, time to intervention, number of procedures, time to resolution, outcomes, and adverse events. Two patients underwent therapy with a mean age of 69.5. The median size of the collections via longest cross-sectional diameter was 10.7 cm. The average number of endoscopic vacuum therapy performed was six and average duration of therapy was 49 days. Complete resolution was achieved in both patients. One patient died 6 weeks later due to severe sepsis from aspiration pneumonia. Endoscopic washout and debridement followed by endoscopic vacuum therapy can be effective for large, even multiple, thoracic and mediastinal contaminations following esophageal perforation and gastroesopagheal anastomotic dehiscence and leaks in appropriately selected patients.


Endoscopy ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carlo Jung ◽  
Rachel Hallit ◽  
Annegret Müller-Dornieden ◽  
Melanie Calmels ◽  
Diane Goere ◽  
...  

Background: Endoscopic internal drainage (EID) with double pigtail stents and low negative pressure endoscopic vacuum therapy (EVT) are treatment options for leakages after upper GI oncologic surgery. We aimed to compare the effectiveness of these techniques. Patients and methods: Between 2016 and 2019, patients treated with EID in five centers in France and with EVT in Göttingen, Germany were included and retrospectively analyzed using univariate analysis. Pigtails were changed every 4 weeks, EVT was repeated every 3-4 days until leak closure. Results: 35 EID and 27 EVT patients were included, with a median leak size of 0.75 cm (0.5-1.5). Overall treatment success was 100% [CI 90; 100] in EID vs. 85.2% [CI 66.3; 95.8] in EVT, p=0.03. The median number of endoscopic procedures was 2 (2; 3) vs. 3 (2; 6.5), p<0.01 and the median treatment duration was 42 (28; 60) vs. 17 days (7.5; 28), p<0.01, for EID vs. EVT, respectively. Conclusion: EID and EVT provide high closure rates for upper GI anastomotic leakages. EVT provides a shorter treatment duration at the cost of a higher number of procedures.


2015 ◽  
Vol 03 (06) ◽  
pp. E547-E551 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gunnar Loske ◽  
Tobias Schorsch ◽  
Christian Dahm ◽  
Eckhard Martens ◽  
Christian Müller

2014 ◽  
Vol 99 (2) ◽  
pp. 112-119 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhi-jie Cong ◽  
Liang-hao Hu ◽  
Jun-jie Xing ◽  
Zheng-qian Bian ◽  
Chuan-gang Fu ◽  
...  

Abstract Anastomotic dehiscence (AD) requiring reoperation is the most severe complication following anterior rectal resection. We performed a systematic review on studies that describe AD requiring reoperation and its subsequent mortality after anterior resection for rectal carcinoma. A systematic search was performed on published literature. Data on the definition and rate of AD, the number of ADs requiring reoperation, the mortality caused by AD, and the overall postoperative mortality were pooled and analyzed. A total of 39 studies with 24,232 patients were analyzed. The studies varied in incidence and definition of AD. Systematic review of the data showed that the overall rate of AD was 8.6%, and the rate of AD requiring reoperation was 5.4%. The postoperative mortality caused by AD was 0.4%, and the overall postoperative mortality was 1.3%. We found considerable risk and mortality for AD requiring reoperation, which largely contributed to the overall postoperative mortality.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document